The Great Debate
05:33 July 6th, 2009

Has the Budget met your expectations?

Tags: Great Debate India, , , ,

INDIA-BUDGET/Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee may have disappointed the markets with a higher spending plan, but the salaried class is definitely walking away a little cheerful.

Mukherjee’s budget announcements include provisions that will see an increase in the take-home component of an individual’s salary.

Income tax exemption has been hiked by 15,000 rupees for senior citizens and 10,000 rupees for the other categories.

Some of the other proposals include elimination of 10 percent surcharge on IT and scrapping of fringe benefits tax (FBT).

Has the budget met your expectations?

Best Comment

July 6th, 2009
4:07 pm EDT
Inclusive growth would be the underpinning for future growth. If the 800 million or so under $1 a day are uplifted - the aim of the current budget - these 800 million will drive the growth further. I think this budget is very sensible and the logic of the FM and the PM of this governtment is pretty obvious to see. There's no beating about the bush - put the money and the opportunity into where the need is. Thanks, Ajay
-Posted by Ajay

15 comments so far

July 6th, 2009 11:08 am GMT - Posted by Ajit

yes am happy with the fact that I would get more salary now!

July 6th, 2009 12:13 pm GMT - Posted by ravikumar

1. i felt wondered for following:
during 2008-09 there was stimulas package and farmers loan waving which resulted into fiscal dificit. how come same has become base for 2009-10?

i feel finance minister lost the numbers somewhere.

2. budget looked like a statement prepared by a clerk. it has filled the blank columns in statement. there is no roadmap on any policy issues.

July 6th, 2009 1:04 pm GMT - Posted by Nagappa

Many budgets made till date.
But common man’s / life of middle class people is remain same.
Prices are keep on increasing on daily basis.
All ministers are getting good salary and perks, why they will think about the rest of the people.
There is lot tell but I will stop here.

July 6th, 2009 2:10 pm GMT - Posted by manoharan

Interest of salaried class could have been looked after in a better way. Tax exemption limit should have been raised by at least 50000. No raise in ceiling on interest paid on home loan (much hyped proposal)!

July 6th, 2009 4:07 pm GMT - Posted by Ajay

Inclusive growth would be the underpinning for future growth. If the 800 million or so under $1 a day are uplifted - the aim of the current budget - these 800 million will drive the growth further. I think this budget is very sensible and the logic of the FM and the PM of this governtment is pretty obvious to see. There’s no beating about the bush - put the money and the opportunity into where the need is.

Thanks, Ajay

July 6th, 2009 5:54 pm GMT - Posted by Darshana Gite

I Think some budget should also be decided for general caste people so that they also get benifit

July 6th, 2009 6:58 pm GMT - Posted by Sandip

Budget was totally based on social development which is the most requirement for the country. But still the focus can be made more on control of CPI along with WPI.

July 6th, 2009 7:27 pm GMT - Posted by praveen desai

i feel this budget is made looking at the 1983 agenda . The world is looking India as superpower but i feel we still have to get more power in the budget which will take care of all secotors .

July 7th, 2009 4:43 am GMT - Posted by Phani

No support for middle class… no support for fertilizer cos… no support for unemployed… in fact who needs roads when drinking water and water for the farms is scarce.. infrastructure spending should have special sections for water and power which will boost the agriculture and in turn the GDP and lower prices for middle class.. it is all related… FM and PM have disappointed me thoroughly…

July 7th, 2009 9:51 am GMT - Posted by Iqbal Singh

The budget is good from people’s point of view. But where are the funds coming from?

As a retired Defence Officer I was shocked that Govt has dealt irrationally with the officers who fought three wars after independence. Pension of some of the old veterns can not even by Daal and Roti for the family. How long nation wants them to carry on working to supplement pension. I am still working on ajob 72 hrs ( 48+ journey time) a week at the age of 71.

Will any one please look into this and correct the anomly in crppled One Rank One Pay announced and make it stand on both legs.

You may publish my mail.

July 7th, 2009 11:49 am GMT - Posted by Parth

I think government try to re-circulate all the things and plan to achieve GDP for FY-09-10. It’s hard to say that budget is good but not as worst. Budget set with 45 day agenda’s for almost all the sectors, need to co-operate with government in recession time. It’s really hard to settle/happy all the people. Dont’ forget India is the 2 fastest growing economy after China in slowdown.

July 7th, 2009 3:58 pm GMT - Posted by ganeshvenkatachalam

very disappointing.no balancing act. no vision for price control.salaried class are the worst suffers at the hands of politicians ,who are at the mercy of policy makers,who rule India behind the curtains. JAI HO

July 8th, 2009 6:27 am GMT - Posted by Dr AK Saxena

limit of section 80 c should be increased to 2 lakhs. one lakh is not sufficient.
tax exemption limit also should be raised to 2 lakhs.

July 8th, 2009 8:25 am GMT - Posted by vikalp tyagi

no not at all the budget is out from expectation nothing is there for comman man and also not for buissnis and compney’s i cant understand why government happy from finance minester only the good news for us is that mr nandan nilkanie become a cabinet minister for comman man it shows that govt look forward for revolution

July 9th, 2009 12:00 pm GMT - Posted by Arindam

Why should so much benefit be given to those earning above rupees 10 lakh? A surcharge waiver helps those ppl save more than 20,000 rupees per annum, but for people earning below 10 lakh the maximum benefit from budget announcements is around 1100 rupees?

The governemnt should think more about the middle class who earns less than 10 lakh rupees. They are the ones who need a higher take home salary!!

Mr Pranab… please listen!

Post Your Comment

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word

House Rules:
  • We moderate all comments and will publish everything that advances the post directly or with relevant tangential
  • We try not to publish comments that we think are offensive or appear to pass you off as another person, and we will be conservative if comments may be considered libelous.information.