<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Breaking the deadlock on nuclear disarmament</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate-uk/2009/05/20/breaking-the-deadlock-on-nuclear-disarmament/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate-uk/2009/05/20/breaking-the-deadlock-on-nuclear-disarmament/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 20:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Damon Mathews</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate-uk/2009/05/20/breaking-the-deadlock-on-nuclear-disarmament/#comment-4360</link>
		<dc:creator>Damon Mathews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 21:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate-uk/?p=1375#comment-4360</guid>
		<description>The status these weapons represent are 
having a great impact on countries  wanting 
to acquire them. By all the current holders 
of nuclear weapons signing onto a treaty,
and employing a system, of disarmament, 
verification, and monitoring of their own 
facilities, we set the example of action 
behind our words.
   
  The United States and Russia leading the 
way is natural and good, as we have the 
largest arsenal, however, the rest of the 
nuclear powers joining with us,disarming 
proportionately with us, is equally 
important, as it shows the solidarity and 
will of the international community; creating 
a climate where these weapons will no longer 
be tolerated. There's no time to lose and we 
mustn't let buerocratic detail mire us into 
inaction any longer. Agreements won't be perfect, 
but we must have them. The time is now! Let's
seize the moment while we still can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The status these weapons represent are<br />
having a great impact on countries  wanting<br />
to acquire them. By all the current holders<br />
of nuclear weapons signing onto a treaty,<br />
and employing a system, of disarmament,<br />
verification, and monitoring of their own<br />
facilities, we set the example of action<br />
behind our words.</p>
<p>  The United States and Russia leading the<br />
way is natural and good, as we have the<br />
largest arsenal, however, the rest of the<br />
nuclear powers joining with us,disarming<br />
proportionately with us, is equally<br />
important, as it shows the solidarity and<br />
will of the international community; creating<br />
a climate where these weapons will no longer<br />
be tolerated. There&#8217;s no time to lose and we<br />
mustn&#8217;t let buerocratic detail mire us into<br />
inaction any longer. Agreements won&#8217;t be perfect,<br />
but we must have them. The time is now! Let&#8217;s<br />
seize the moment while we still can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Ingram</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate-uk/2009/05/20/breaking-the-deadlock-on-nuclear-disarmament/#comment-3843</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Ingram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 15:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate-uk/?p=1375#comment-3843</guid>
		<description>One of the key things that is required is greater communication and grand coalitions between communities that previously have not even sat down to talk with each other - foreign with defence ministries, the deterrence with arms control &#38; disarmament communities, energy companies and disarmament groups. There are more areas of common interest than we might at first think, if we can get past traditional positions, and language that separates trhough misinterpretation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the key things that is required is greater communication and grand coalitions between communities that previously have not even sat down to talk with each other - foreign with defence ministries, the deterrence with arms control &amp; disarmament communities, energy companies and disarmament groups. There are more areas of common interest than we might at first think, if we can get past traditional positions, and language that separates trhough misinterpretation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
