The Great Debate
06:03 June 1st, 2009

GM: Chapter 11 or bust

Tags: Great Debate UK, Great Debate US, , , , , , ,

David Bailey- Professor David Bailey works at the Coventry University Business School and has written extensively on globalisation, economic restructuring and industrial policy, with particular reference to the auto industry. The opinions expressed are his own. -

GM declared itself bankrupt on Monday in one of the largest bankruptcies in U.S. history, in an attempt to seek protection from creditors.

The firm has stacked up over $80 billion of losses in the last four years, also swallowing some $20 billion in cash from the Obama administration. It is likely to need another $30 billion before emerging from Chapter 11 substantially slimmed down and free of debts.

A bankruptcy judge will decide who gets what assets. It’s not clear whether during Chapter 11 the firm will continue to function and assemble cars.

It used to be said that “whatever’s good for GM is good for the U.S. economy”. Whilst GM is no longer the world’s biggest carmaker, by some estimates it still accounts for 1 percent of the U.S. economy. The bankruptcy is not only hugely symbolic of the fate of the ailing U.S. car industry, but is of huge importance for all the workers, suppliers, dealers and creditors caught up in its travails.

Republicans have begun to criticise the U.S. president’s handling of the GM affair, but it is difficult to see what else the U.S. president could have done.

Obama had to give GM time to come up with a credible plan, and I have always thought that the firm would need up to $50 billion of government support to get through the downturn and restructuring.

Under the proposed plan, the U.S. government would get a stake of over 70 percent in GM in return for another $30 billion of state cash, with the United Auto Workers union taking 17.5 percent initially, with the union accepting shares in GM instead of cash owed by the firm for retired employees healthcare cover.

A majority of GM’s bondholders have accepted the offer to swap their $27 billion in debt for an initial stake of 10 percent with the option of buying 15 percent more later. Their agreement to do this should help in speeding GM’s progress through Chapter 11 and avoid expensive legal battles.

Whilst a minority group of bondholders are holding out for a better deal, in reality this restructuring is the only game in town.

Hopefully, the new GM that emerges from Chapter 11 will be leaner, fitter and free of debts. It will include the firm’s best models and R&D and will scrap brands like Pontiac, Hummer and Saturn.

By 2012, the new GM will comprise the Chevrolet, Cadillac and Buick brands, plus its GMC truck brand. Of particular importance, its forthcoming electric Chevvy Volt car will be part of the new firm.

“GM-Lite” will cut the number of assembly sites across North America, including Canada, to 33 within three years, from 47 at the end of last year.

Eventually, the goal is to float the new firm on the New York Stock Exchange. It will shed some 20,000 or more workers in the U.S., and has also told over a thousand dealers in the U.S. that they are at risk of losing their franchise. GM plans to lose 2,300 from its 6,000-strong network.

In a deal with the UAW which saves the firm $1 billion a year, rules on breaks, vacation and overtime have been changed, retiree benefits have been cut, and the UAW has agreed not to strike until September 2015 at the earliest.

GM will never be the biggest manufacturer again, but Chapter 11 is anyway about restructuring the firm, erasing the debts, cutting costs and reorienting the firm towards more environmentally friendly cars.

A viable car company may yet emerge from the ashes of the old GM, thanks to an interventionist U.S. government which is investing heavily in new green technologies.

The situation here in the UK is rather different. An efficient and world class car industry is struggling given the impact of recession and credit crunch, and the British government has largely been a spectator as GM Europe has been sold off.

That in turn could have a very significant impact on jobs at Vauxhall here in the UK.

Best Comment

June 2nd, 2009
4:54 pm EDT
so have we become a socialist state then? we've bailed out the banks now Chrysler and GM. then again it was the capitalist system that got us into this mess, remember?
-Posted by jack o

24 comments so far

June 9th, 2009 2:24 am GMT - Posted by C. D. Walker

If you want to take a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodore_Ro osevelt and read up on what Theodore Roosevelt tried to do, why, I believe I am only following the same ideas as one of the greatest Presidents in History. The right things to do are timeless. 100 years ago he, and America, were faced with many of the same issues.

“He distrusted wealthy businessmen and dissolved forty monopolistic corporations as a “trust buster”. He was clear, however, to show that he did not disagree with trusts and capitalism in principle, but was only against corrupt, illegal practices. His “Square Deal” promised a fair shake for both the average citizen (through regulation of railroad rates and pure food and drugs) and the businessman. He was the first U.S. president to call for universal health care and national health insurance.[6][7] As an outdoorsman, he promoted the conservation movement, emphasizing efficient use of natural resources. After 1906 he attacked big business and suggested the courts were biased against labor unions.”

I ask you what is so different about what i suggest, and this President who’s face graces Mt. Rushmore right next to Lincoln, Jefferson, and Washington.

True Statesmanship examples are littered throughout our great history, we only need to remember lessons we should have already learned.

June 8th, 2009 10:38 pm GMT - Posted by C. D. Walker

In some earlier posts on this “Great Debate”, i railed against (Ivy league) Business Executheves of “The Big Three” for their Idiotic use of Management Styles.

I would just like to post http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawthorne_e ffec
(What a great Collection of Human Knowledge, as easy to read, learn, and grow as having a new phone.)
This “Study” was done in 1931-1932
(I think the Fed began printing our money in 1933?)

“Bank wiring room experiments”

“The purpose of the next study was to find out how payment incentives would affect group productivity. The surprising result was that productivity actually decreased. Workers apparently had become suspicious that their productivity may have been boosted to justify firing some of the workers later on.[12] The study was conducted by Mayo and W. Lloyd Warner between 1931 and 1932 on a group of fourteen men who put together telephone switching equipment. The researchers found that although the workers were paid according to individual productivity, productivity decreased because the men were afraid that the company would lower the base rate. Detailed observation between the men revealed the existence of informal groups or “cliques” within the formal groups. These cliques developed informal rules of behavior as well as mechanisms to enforce them. The cliques served to control group members and to manage bosses; when bosses asked questions, clique members gave the same responses, even if they were untrue. These results show that workers were more responsive to the social force of their peer groups than to the control and incentives of management.”

They KNEW, and did it for Greedy Profit anyway.

And if they didn’t? With the Business Ethics 101 all students are required to take; They should get their money back and sue their school.

June 8th, 2009 5:28 pm GMT - Posted by C. D. Walker

Surprise, surprise, surprise,
Businessticians (Businessmen in Politics-wonder who they are really for?) are giving other Businessmen billions of dollars that really haven’t had an effect on America and her Economy, but these actions HAVE moved Billions of Taxpayer money from hard working Americans into the hands of more “Businessmen”! Hey, how many of you out there in Main St. have helped your buddies get a job or some money?

Didn’t Obama go to Yale, or Harvard (definately Ivy League) the same places where most of those on GM’s Executive Board went to get higher, pricier “Education”?

How many constructions workers, Farmers, and factory workers from all corners of America know a “Businessman” educated in a Ivy League school, or a Politician personally?

Hmmm, a separate society of people who keep themselves distant from the masses, and use MONEY as a divider? Why are rich kids taught at “Private Schools”? Why don’t Public Schools take how “Private Schools” teach the kids(obviously how they teach those kids works) and implement those styles?

My, my, is this small group of highly educated, very rich people very carefully creating a “Monetary Aristocracy”, a division of purpose where they(Ultra Rich) are the only ones with education and who have the money to run for office? Ooops, they already did.

If you look at this Political system (made up of Businessmen- not statesman like George Washington, Ben Franklin, or Thomas Jefferson) as slowly and purposely making use all dependent on “Government” for a “Stream of Income” (welfare) to become financial slaves!

Then these intelligent “Businessmen” then can blame the Government for making this country a “Socialist” country. Which I am sure they would then try and convince the public that “Business” has their best interest at heart as they continue to dismantle our Constitution, Liberties and Freedom as “Business” and “Banks” continue to act like Communists trying to own everything.

Our Constitution guarantee’s Life, Liberty, and Property. What are these “Businessticians” doing to our country?

June 8th, 2009 1:14 pm GMT - Posted by Ajay

This all needs a broader industrial strategy to put in place a green infrastructure (e.g. recharging points) which the free marketeers won’t like - then agian look where the ‘free’ market got us. Financial meltdown.

Post Your Comment

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word

House Rules:
  • We moderate all comments and will publish everything that advances the post directly or with relevant tangential
  • We try not to publish comments that we think are offensive or appear to pass you off as another person, and we will be conservative if comments may be considered libelous.information.