Shareholder confidence vs. value investing
- Brendan Wood is Chairman of Brendan Wood International, a global intelligence advisory firm. Recently, BWI published the World’s TopGun CEOs as ranked by 2500 institutional investors, which provides insight into the executives in whom shareholders feel the greatest confidence. The opinions expressed are his own. -
The Brendan Wood International’s panel of 2500 institutional investors suffered through last year’s markets believing value would somehow prevail. Those value investing “diehards” indeed died hard.
Conversely, those who correctly read the status of shareholder confidence and acted on it were spared. In short, shareholders that had lost confidence in the system abandoned their value criteria and sold good companies along with lesser ones.
As a result, “value” investors were left holding a bag full of stocks with hidden value. Sadly, the value remained undercover while the price of these stocks plummeted. Many portfolios catapulted through risk tolerance levels and took their investors’ savings along with them. Capital preservation was sacrificed in favor of the mantra “the market always comes back.”
But as advocates of Shareholder Confidence, we ask why take that ride and lose the most important strengths an investor has, namely, capital and a willingness to assume reasonable risk?
If half your life savings or more was lost, what capital or willingness to assume further risk would you have? Shareholder confidence trumps hidden value. If value in a company is credible to those holding the stock, the price will at least remain stable, if not indeed rise.
Should this not be the case, one may be stuck owning the most costly secret in town. This may be so because value investing relies on shareholder confidence coming to the forefront.
ON THE CONTRARY!
A majority of investors classify themselves as contrarians. Surprisingly, they agree with one another about 70 percent of the time. This raises two obvious questions. What is the benefit of contrarianism? Why is it considered a quality? If the majority of investors disagree with you (or you with them), the future of a portfolio relies upon them changing their minds. How much success can an investor expect via changing other people’s minds? Are contrarians delusional about being contrarians? It appears so. Like it or not, the success of contrarians depends on consensus, that is, other contrarians agreeing with them. BWI may have thus uncovered the “quiet contrarian majority”.
SHAREHOLDER CONFIDENCE AND THE CURRENT MARKET
Prior to the 2008 downturn, the number of companies at the top of the Shareholder Confidence Index approached 33 percent. Since the dramatic weakening of markets, that number has been running at 17-18 percent. With no change in the recent quarter, investors remain wary and are not yet ready to assert top levels of confidence (i.e. buying behavior) except in the Top 18 percent.
If investors were to follow the example of Brendan Wood International’s panel, they would only be buying the best of the best.