<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPod Nano redesign challenges Flip</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate-uk/2009/09/10/ipod-nano-redesign-challenges-flip/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate-uk/2009/09/10/ipod-nano-redesign-challenges-flip/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 15:00:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mitland</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate-uk/2009/09/10/ipod-nano-redesign-challenges-flip/comment-page-1/#comment-6661</link>
		<dc:creator>mitland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 20:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate-uk/?p=3171#comment-6661</guid>
		<description>THANK YOU APPLE! The nano will have a FM radio, i have been waiting for this upgrade forever. That is the best upgrade to the nano over the last three years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THANK YOU APPLE! The nano will have a FM radio, i have been waiting for this upgrade forever. That is the best upgrade to the nano over the last three years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark H.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate-uk/2009/09/10/ipod-nano-redesign-challenges-flip/comment-page-1/#comment-6657</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 17:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate-uk/?p=3171#comment-6657</guid>
		<description>Well at least I can now get a 160GB &#039;pod to replace my two-year old one. I was hoping for 240 gig, however. Sigh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well at least I can now get a 160GB &#8216;pod to replace my two-year old one. I was hoping for 240 gig, however. Sigh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wayneski</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate-uk/2009/09/10/ipod-nano-redesign-challenges-flip/comment-page-1/#comment-6648</link>
		<dc:creator>wayneski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate-uk/?p=3171#comment-6648</guid>
		<description>Added features is good thing in this case. 

I cant see any fault, very good media player, more stuff added equals more sales.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Added features is good thing in this case. </p>
<p>I cant see any fault, very good media player, more stuff added equals more sales.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: altrenda</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate-uk/2009/09/10/ipod-nano-redesign-challenges-flip/comment-page-1/#comment-6647</link>
		<dc:creator>altrenda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 15:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate-uk/?p=3171#comment-6647</guid>
		<description>The Nano is fine if you want to record videos of your cat for youtube, but the low resolution camera cannot compete with the High Definition capabilities of the Flip or other low cost cameras available.

And most mobile phones now shoot video as well or better than the Nano.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Nano is fine if you want to record videos of your cat for youtube, but the low resolution camera cannot compete with the High Definition capabilities of the Flip or other low cost cameras available.</p>
<p>And most mobile phones now shoot video as well or better than the Nano.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gsweet</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate-uk/2009/09/10/ipod-nano-redesign-challenges-flip/comment-page-1/#comment-6644</link>
		<dc:creator>gsweet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate-uk/?p=3171#comment-6644</guid>
		<description>best comment?? &quot;Nonplussed that the iPod touch remains sans camera! Perhaps Apple is concerned that it&#039;ll galvanise iPhone sales&quot;

surely you mean &quot;Cannibalize&quot;??? ROFL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>best comment?? &#8220;Nonplussed that the iPod touch remains sans camera! Perhaps Apple is concerned that it&#8217;ll galvanise iPhone sales&#8221;</p>
<p>surely you mean &#8220;Cannibalize&#8221;??? ROFL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate-uk/2009/09/10/ipod-nano-redesign-challenges-flip/comment-page-1/#comment-6643</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate-uk/?p=3171#comment-6643</guid>
		<description>Apple and all it products are great. They give other competitors a run for their money to say the least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple and all it products are great. They give other competitors a run for their money to say the least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gotthardbahn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate-uk/2009/09/10/ipod-nano-redesign-challenges-flip/comment-page-1/#comment-6642</link>
		<dc:creator>gotthardbahn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate-uk/?p=3171#comment-6642</guid>
		<description>Apple rules!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple rules!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hood</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate-uk/2009/09/10/ipod-nano-redesign-challenges-flip/comment-page-1/#comment-6641</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate-uk/?p=3171#comment-6641</guid>
		<description>Nonplussed that the iPod touch remains sans camera! Perhaps Apple is concerned that it&#039;ll galvanise iPhone sales. However, the new Nano looks compelling within the social media space.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nonplussed that the iPod touch remains sans camera! Perhaps Apple is concerned that it&#8217;ll galvanise iPhone sales. However, the new Nano looks compelling within the social media space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
