2010 Budget: Time to face the music

March 22, 2010

EdwardCroft– Edward Croft is CEO of Stockopedia, a UK-based website which aggregates research, commentary and analysis for investors and offers social networking opportunities. The opinions expressed are his own. He will participate in a Reuters Budget live blog at noon GMT on Wednesday, March 24, 2010. Please tune in and join the discussion.

In his recent ‘New Economic Model’ speech,  Shadow Chancellor George Osborne rightly emphasised the need to restore a savings culture in this country. Investment to GDP is the lowest of any G7 country.

The Association of British Insurers estimates over 13 million people are not saving enough towards their retirement.

The gaping pension deficit to be funded by future generations means that savings and investment levels are not just parochial concerns for the investment community.

The household saving ratio has fallen from 9.2 percent to 3.9 percent in the last decade. The government deserves credit for increasing ISA allowances but there’s much more that could be done.

In a recent Brewin Dolphin survey, 47 percent of private investors called for the restoration of dividend tax credits, 36 percent for raising the Inheritance Tax threshold and 29 percent for the reduction of stamp duty on share transactions.

We can also attest to the evident need to cut the tax and administrative burden on small businesses, long described by politicians as the locomotives of the economy but with little to show for it.

Nevertheless, when we spoke to investors on Stockopedia, the general view was that this coming budget is just not the time for tax cutting.

The unfortunate reality of our macro-economic predicament means that there’s very little left in the coffers and there’s an urgent need for tough but unpopular decisions to balance the books by reining in public spending and increasing taxes.

The plea from our users was for the government to focus immediately on reducing the ballooning deficit and on simplifying the tax system.

Instead of the tinkering to assuage special interest groups, it was felt that an honest appraisal of our dire situation was needed and a collective cutting of the cloth with as few different rates as possible.

The markets were not impressed by December’s pre-budget report  and nervous investors are looking for a clear path from Chancellor Alistair Darling towards restored macro-economic stability. To reassure them, this budget should provide for:

1.      An immediate commitment to making the tough decisions needed to cut government expenditure;

2.      A medium term commitment to addressing the savings gap in the UK economy

3.      Equitable sharing of the burdens from increased taxation – investors and savers are willing to share the pain in this time of crisis provided that this is done in an even handed manner.

4.      Reduced complexity to remove the plethora of allowances, credits, exemptions that add layers of bureaucracy and give scope for evasion.

5.      Easing the burden on entreprise by cutting administrative red tape. Why not abolish National Insurance? It is effectively a tax on income, so let’s just be honest about it and save the bureaucracy and administration of two income taxes.

If these measures are not introduced in this week’s budget, precious time will be lost. The new government, assuming there is one, will certainly have its work cut out trying simultaneously to address the deficit, cut back on spending, streamline the tax regime, while introducing incentives to encourage savings.


We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/

Alternatively move NI to local councils and abolish council tax and the business rate.

Also, abolish tax releif on charitable donations.

I don’t want to subsidise other people’s religion, and I’m pretty sure other people don’t want to subsidise mine.

There are many registered charities that compete with businesses, but on an unequal footing.

Posted by Dafydd | Report as abusive

For any system of taxation to function effectively there is a basic requirement for it to be perceived by the general population as being fair, otherwise you inevitably end up replicating the pitifull tax regimes of Greece, Spain, Italy and a host of others, in which it is deemed a matter of honour and pride on the part of the local citizenry to evade as far as is humanly possible paying any form of tax whatsoever.
Legislation in general and taxation in particular within the UK does not and never has rewarded the prudent and industrious middle strata of the nation, instead it tends to constantly penalise the aforementioned group with an ever increasing punative regulatory and taxation burden.
A change of this policy is long overdue, however the likelyhood remains as distant as ever.

Posted by entitlementculture | Report as abusive

Tough decisions should not be unpopular. Politicians should not have to worry about adverse short term electoral consequences from making decisions that are in the best interests of the country. Unless the public changes its expectations of politicians, and allows them to show more resolution and vision, our current democratic framework will never deliver a national revival.

Posted by Oliver Chettle | Report as abusive

[…] This blog was first published on Reuters.com […]

Posted by 2010 Budget: Time to face the music « Stockopedia | Report as abusive