<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Greece deal is a compromise and, once again, the banks have won</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate-uk/2011/07/25/greece-deal-is-a-compromise-and-once-again-the-banks-have-won/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate-uk/2011/07/25/greece-deal-is-a-compromise-and-once-again-the-banks-have-won/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 11:09:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sal2011</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate-uk/2011/07/25/greece-deal-is-a-compromise-and-once-again-the-banks-have-won/comment-page-1/#comment-17369</link>
		<dc:creator>Sal2011</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 17:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate-uk/?p=10112#comment-17369</guid>
		<description>Refreshing to find an academic more clued up than the practical wizards of banking and our esteemed economic policy makers, or do I mean depressing?  I can&#039;t understand the following:
- Let the old reckless bank, with its selfish management default
(I was about to write selfish idiotic, but they don&#039;t really qualify as idiots with the amount of loot they&#039;ve got)
- Repay the common saver citizen
- Set up new alternative financing institutions for businesses and common citizens, giving the managers of the institutions a call option on the financial assets
- Set capacity and lending ranges for certain basic society functions
This is for taxpayer money of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Refreshing to find an academic more clued up than the practical wizards of banking and our esteemed economic policy makers, or do I mean depressing?  I can&#8217;t understand the following:<br />
- Let the old reckless bank, with its selfish management default<br />
(I was about to write selfish idiotic, but they don&#8217;t really qualify as idiots with the amount of loot they&#8217;ve got)<br />
- Repay the common saver citizen<br />
- Set up new alternative financing institutions for businesses and common citizens, giving the managers of the institutions a call option on the financial assets<br />
- Set capacity and lending ranges for certain basic society functions<br />
This is for taxpayer money of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
