The Great Debate UK
The spoils of EU reform
- Alain Délétroz is Vice President Europe at the International Crisis Group, www.crisisgroup.org. The opinions expressed are his own. -
There is a sumptuous feast happening in Brussels, but some are better fed than others. What to many may seem an indigestible alphabet soup of new EU institutions dealing with foreign policy after the Lisbon treaty, is actually a smorgasbord of patronage, favour and influence.
Britain may feel it has done well to get the spot at the head of the table in the form of new High Representative Catherine Ashton, but in reality the French and Germans seem to be the ones setting the menu.
Currently at issue is an organ called the Crisis Management Planning Directorate (CMPD), which is intended to be at the very heart of Ashton’s External Action Service — essentially the new European diplomatic corps.
In December 2008, the European Council agreed to merge civilian and military aspects of the planning for European peace keeping missions into a single CMPD. It was a logical step that would help the EU be more efficient in its response to conflicts.
As this new structure is now taking shape, however, the military aspect has been given vastly disproportionate weight.
Civilian experts, most notably the former director on the civilian crisis management side, have been pushed out of the decision-making structures.

I ve come across research (Wolfgang Wagner and Jovanna Bonno if I am not mistaken) about national parliamentary approval procedures for sending troops on foreign missions. On several occasions France (among other countries) had failed to comply with these procedures when contributing to ESDP military missions. This country is my N1 suspect for trying to kidnap some of the foreign policy tools in order to further its own agenda.
Stuffing the EEAS with military staff and keeping the civ-mil cells miniscule will not bring about the needed flexibility and robustness of civilian capabilities. And it is beyond any doubt that civilian tools and prevention mechanisms is what EU needs now for its foreign policy.
Right now – what can the EU do if a confict re-errupts in Nagorno Karabakh or in Republica Srpska ? nothing