David and Neighbour You are quite right about the massacre of Jews in Hebron in 1929. The fact that the massacre happened in the context of the struggle against Zionist plans to turn Palestine into a Jewish state does not change the fact that the massacre was a terrible crime. I should have mentioned it, but didn't because I was given only 600 words. I stuck to what I saw, to what is happening today. I speak as as somebody who is very aware of Arab sectarianism and its negative effect on Jews, Shia Muslims and other minorities. Sectarianism is one of the things that make Arabs weak, and I and many Arabs revile it. (It so happens that I have a Syrian Jewish aunt). However, the anti-Jewish feeling amongst most Palestinians and other Arabs today is directed not at Jews in general but in the faces of the Jewsish state that has dispossessed the Palestinians. Neighbour says the child settlers are not gun-wielding. True, but I have been shown many films (they're on Youtube) of settler children hitting, kicking and throwing stones at Palestinian men, women and children. When they do this, they are protected by gun-wielding adult settlers and by soldiers. Again, I should have mentioned this, but was stopped by my 600 word limit. As for Jews only having access to 3% of Hebron - Israeli Jews are forbidden access to the rest of the city (unless they are soldiers, who move in at will) as a result of Israeli laws. However, I met French and American Jews (pro-Palestinian activists and academics) who live and work in Hebron, Ramallah and other West Bank cities. The apartheid system was brought in by Israel. Then there's the small matter that according to international law, there should be NO Israeli civilians living in occupied territory. The Palestinian leadership (which I'm not a fan of) has in any case said that in the event of a two-state solution, any Jewish settlers who will accept to live under Palestinian sovereignty can stay on the West Bank. And, yes, I am biased. I was also biased against apartheid South Africa.; If this was the 1930s, I'd be biased against Nazi Germany, and also aginst the pro-Zionist but anti-Semitic immigration policies of the US and British governments. (which blocked access to fleeing European Jews, forcing them to go to Palestine instead).

I'm don't think it's accurate to call what these two shows do "fake news". They take actual events and highlight aspects of it for humor and/or to point out the stupidity of the people involved. That's not being fake nor is it falsifying the "newsworthy" event.

I guess I should be heartened to know some people still have a sense of humor as we watch all our little "Neros" fiddle around as the Capitols burn, albeit figuratively.

[...] For the Record » Blog Archive » Citizen journalism, mainstream media and Iran | Blogs | Reuters confronts social networks as news sources during Iran coverage. Article by Dean Wright and John Clarke, with a focus on verification standards. (tags: Reuters citmedia iran) [...]

No, there will be a struggle for power as soon as the Us leaves the country. Iraq is too divided, and there are too many unsolved cultural, polital and religious issues for Iraq to become a peaceful and safe place to live.