Opinion

The Great Debate

Fix immigration by next Thanksgiving

November 27, 2008

diana-furchtgott-roth1– Diana Furchtgott-Roth, former chief economist at the U.S. Department of Labor, is a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute. The opinions expressed are her own. —

The first Thanksgiving festival was celebrated in 1621 in Massachusetts by the Pilgrims, immigrants to America, out of gratitude for a plentiful harvest.

As we sit around our Thanksgiving tables this Thursday, almost all of us immigrants or their descendants, we’re reminded that one of President-elect Obama’s most important challenges will be to mend our broken immigration policy.

Instead of a rational immigration system, we have occasional raids by immigration officers on plants suspected of employing illegals. Then come deportations that may separate an undocumented parent and children whose birth in the United States made them citizens.

The most controversial facet of the immigration challenge is what to do about the estimated 12 million undocumented immigrants. Most are unlikely to return to their native lands, even in today’s tough economic climate.

Nor would we want them to do so. They work at jobs that few Americans choose to do, both in high-skill area—scientific and medical research, for instance—and in mundane yet essential low-skill jobs, such as gardening, washing cars, and cleaning.

In 2007, Congress did not pass President Bush’s comprehensive immigration proposals, supported by the Democratic leadership and many Republicans. Will Obama succeed where Bush failed?

Obama’s proposal mirrors the bill that failed: increased border protection; more visas for new immigrants; penalties for employers who hire undocumented workers; and eventual citizenship for undocumented workers already here, after payment of a fine. It would be a major improvement.

But with unemployment rising, if Congress won’t pass immigration reform, it could still improve the functioning of American labor markets with narrower action. It could authorize the Department of Labor to decide on its own the number of work permits and temporary visas to be issued each calendar quarter.

Every year, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), as instructed by law, issues 65,000 H-1b temporary visas for skilled workers. These lucky workers are certified by the Labor Department out of approximately 630,000 approved applications from employers. Immigrants who hold H-1b visas must return to their home countries when their jobs end.

Yet, as the numbers show, most applicants do not get a visa. Many skilled foreign college graduates who have been studying in America, often at American taxpayer expense, are denied access to American jobs. They must leave, taking their intellectual achievements and valuable skills with them.

Foreign workers benefit the American economy. They pay taxes. They keep laboratories and motels, high-tech shows and construction sites, running. They cannot if they are sent away.

For 2009, the H-1b visa cap of 65,000 was reached one week after the start of the application process on April 1, 2008. That represents a tiny part of the U.S. labor force of 154 million. Even if the quota were raised to 150,000, that would be less than one tenth of 1% of the labor force. Such a quota would still deny admission to the vast majority of prospective applicants who don’t apply due to the small likelihood of success.

Whereas Congress is ill-suited to change laws each time the economy goes up or down, the Labor Department has both the expertise to evaluate changing labor markets and the flexibility to adjust visa quotas. Congress should consider letting the Labor Department make quarterly decisions about how many visas to issue.

When unemployment rises, the Department would issue fewer visas; when it goes down, visas could be increased. The Department could manage visas without causing undue burden on U.S. workers or community facilities, such as schools and hospitals.

Allowing the Labor Department to adjust legal immigration every quarter would help America. President-elect Obama could leave behind the rancor and division over immigration that have plagued the Bush administration, and set a new tone for a new year. That would be something to be thankful for next Thanksgiving.

Diana Furchtgott-Roth can be reached at dfr@hudson.org.

Comments
122 comments so far | RSS Comments RSS

Diana, you seem very ignorant of the burdens imposed upon us by the unrestrained immigration of the last 35 years that has resulted in a near doubling of our population. It is difficult to add much to the well researched comments above by those who understand how very wrong you are. Suffice to say we are the ONLY country in the world that permits this madness. I wish to thank you for being one of those who has contributed much to making us the overpopulated and uneducated mess we are now. We are only a couple decades from being the largest latin american country in the world. Again, thank you for the careful thought you have put into this article. I sincerely hope that developmentally challenged individuals like yourself are not responsible for the policies of this nation going forward but I suspect that this will indeed be the case.

Posted by W. Holder | Report as abusive
 

Recently I was in San Jose CA at Cisco’s Headquarters. What an eyeopener! It seems every 2nd person there is Indian or Pakistan.
Considering that the median salary at Cisco is $125,000 … these certainly aren’t medial jobs. Of course this came about because American’s didn’t want these positions and not because Cisco did some major lobbying to make it happen. Right?

Posted by Randy T | Report as abusive
 

Fortunately , us “common” people are becoming wise to the greedy self serving few in this country.

Posted by Brad | Report as abusive
 

Clearly she is a person who has no real world association with illegal immigrants. Come live in Southern California for a month or two, then rewrite your silly Thanksgiving pontification. I’d be much more thankful if we’d end the idiocy of allowing illegal immigrants to commit crimes and access services in this country.

Posted by Karl | Report as abusive
 

To people who think that the reform will be good for the economy: I cannot believe how naive you are saying that if legalized those illegal immigrants will boost the economy by purchasing houses, cars etc. – these people LAREADY own cars and houses – in my town almost half of the houses are owned by people who are here illegally, and they have cars and go on vacations etc. – so they are already contributing to the economy and legalization will not boost the economy.

Posted by Jennifer | Report as abusive
 

Can the Labor Dept. issue 1/2 million visas? No. Therefore: people will continue coming here illegally. No fence can stop them. Illegal immigrants are the hardest working people in this country, very few of them engage in crime activity. Most of them get legalized (thru amnesty) after 10-15 years. Keep it this way. Only the best can survive 10 years of hard labor to become citizens. Their children learn the valuable lesson of “hard work pays” thru their parents.

Posted by Stas | Report as abusive
 

Perhaps it’s best if readers knew something about the person/institute submitting this article.

From the Hudson Institute own website:
“From February 2003 to April 2005 Ms. Furchtgott-Roth was chief economist of the U.S. Department of Labor. Previously she served as chief of staff at the President’s Council of Economic Advisers.”

From Wikipedia:
It(Hudson Institute)was described by US foreign policy scholars John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt as “closely associated with neoconservatives”.

The Hudson Institute is supported by donations from companies and individuals. Corporate contributors include Eli Lilly and Company, Monsanto, DuPont, Dow-Elanco, Sandoz, Ciba-Geigy, ConAgra, Cargill, and Procter & Gamble.

So fellow readers… an article from one of the chief economists during the gestation period of this current meltdown. Now associated with a neoconservative think tank.

You come to your own conclusions.

Posted by Barry | Report as abusive
 

I sincerely hope that developmentally challenged individuals like yourself are not responsible for the policies of this nation going forward but I suspect that this will indeed be the case.
Very true!

Posted by brandon | Report as abusive
 

What a shame that the front runner of capitalism is running away from competition? Lets have a “May the best man win” competition for jobs too. We dont think twice before we bomb Iraq, before we terrorise Afghanistan and when some poor sod from India comes along and works for us we dont want him here saying he takes away our jobs. Frankly, a lot of these huge corporates of ours are standing on the shoulders of hard working Asians. As the young man observed every second person in Cisco is Indian or Paki. Such spineless talk just re affirms that our days as a super power are over unless we are ready to pull up our socks and work and compete and win against all tribes and races.

Posted by Janit | Report as abusive
 

Ernest would like a solution for “…the humanity of the people living and working in the country illegally.”

The problem is that when Americans insist upon immigration enforcement, we get “malicious compliance” from our government.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malicious_c ompliance

Most Americans were agreeable to the terms of the IRCA amnesty, but Congress refused to enact the employer sanctions written into the law. Instead of employer sanctions, Congress has given us troops on the border, a non-contiguous fence, workplace raids and deportations; everything but employer-sanctions. This is malicious compliance, which is also passive-aggressive behavior.

The AGJOBS bill is a perfect example of malicious compliance, offering a limited path to citizenship while removing wage protections, housing standards, transportation reimbersement and allowing profiteers to charge huge fees for guest worker visa processing in Latin America. (No CIR bill is much better than a bad CIR bill.)

The practice of hiring illegal labor was once limited to the informal economy, the practice has now infiltrated into the formal economy and employers are getting away with deducting illegal wage expenses from gross-income.

Additionally, the labor subsidy that forced-migration provides inhibits diversification and investment in Latin America where labor is plentiful. Nearshoring allows workers to attain housing equity, in an affordable market, thus preparing the worker for old age.

For most Americans, if employer sanctions (which should involve the fear of a seven year IRS audit to recover illegally deducted wages from gross income) is off the table, amnesty is also off the table.

Illegal immigrants are not the only people suffering, Americans are losing homes and retirement savings too. Economic expulsion of American citizens through immigration (labor price controls) policy, where is the compassion for these Americans?

Guest (migrant) workers must be required (and paid enough) to maintain a foreign residence. This is the true measure of “market wage” and will cause prosperity to visit Latin America through investment and larger remittances.

Give us a bill that causes employers to answer to the IRS for Social Security no-match letters. Deny the deduction of illegal wages, force illegal employers to pay these taxes and penalties on these illegal deductions and you have a bill that America will favor.

Involving the IRS in the process, will turn illegal employment enforcement into a revenue-positive vehicle and will also address the problem of visa overstays. Visa overstays are 40% of illegal immigration.

This thesis is pure economics, not “hiding behind patriotism.”

Finally, ten Dollar lettuce will never be a function of labor cost (7%), it will be a function of devaluation of the Dollar due to credit defaults.

Posted by weaver | Report as abusive
 

I kinda like having the illegals around, if they are from Latin America. They tend to do their work with a minimum of whining & snivelling, they do not goof off while on the job, they don’t demand permission to listen to their iPods when working, and they don’t sue their employers. The typical Gringo, however, is quite another story.

In addition, most of the illegals have not participated in the great American food and debt orgy that the USA is now recovering from. Though I think the food orgy is still going on based on those increasing waist sizes. My gripe with the current immigration pool is all these people from the former Soviet Union countries. Mr. Gorbachev, put back that wall! They bring crime with them much worse than anything that came over with the Mariel Boatlift.

Posted by Mike Z | Report as abusive
 

fyi

Posted by amin | Report as abusive
 

Foreign college students studying in the US at taxpayers’ expense? Are you kidding? I am a foreign student and I am not eligible for any financial aid.

Posted by Meng Qi | Report as abusive
 

I recall a book where the author wrote in the preface that she had aproached the writing with all the positive energy which comes from being ignorant.I`ll say no more.

Posted by Reader | Report as abusive
 

i believe the solution would be to tighten the border security. Then as prescribed in Obama’s imm reform, grant already undocumented immigrants in the system stay but letting them pay some form of fine.

ping…..

 

To suggest that America is somehow suffering for a lack of labor is disingenuous at best. And to rely upon never-ending population growth as a source of economic growth is bad economics. We face far too many challenges in this country already that will only be exacerbated by further rampant population growth fueled by immigration. Breaking our dependence on foreign oil and reducing carbon emissions, just to name a couple, will be impossible if we keep importing more oil consumers and more carbon emitters.

It’s time we stopped giving credence to these economists who are so bankrupt of ideas for improving our macroeconomy that they fall back on a reliance on destructive population growth.

 

America is the land of immigrants i would say. tighter borders and a deal for the illegal immigrants in the states would go a long way in solving this problem

 

“They work at jobs that few Americans choose to do, both in high-skill area—scientific and medical research, for instance—and in mundane yet essential low-skill jobs, such as gardening, washing cars, and cleaning.”

This is exactly why immigration is a problem. While most of the main stream press reports things such as the statement above, this is NOT the truth. These people aren’t here doing just those jobs. They’re taking good paying construction jobs away from Americans. I see it everywhere my company travels.

I say we have another “Operation Wetback” just like in the 50′s. Round them all up, don’t just send them back across the southern border, but put them on a ship and take them as far south as possible in Mexico and put them off on a remote island that belongs to Mexico. Make it Mexico’s problem.

Posted by Roundup_Logan | Report as abusive
 

BTW – the exchange rate for the peso is currently about 13:1. So if you can manage to get in this country and earn $15 an hour working construction – that’s equivelant to making $195 peso an hour or 1560 peso a day. If you work 6 days a week that’s almost $9500 pesos a week. I’m sure if you were in Mexico you can live pretty high on the hog with about $40,000 pesos a month. Especially if you’re not paying any taxes on it. I know a lot of these guys come here and work about 6-9 months a year and then turn themselves in to get a free ride back to Mexico at our expense.

Posted by Roundup_Logan | Report as abusive
 

Immigration and free trade is the root cause of the disappearing middle class. The influx of immigrants into our work force is deteriorating the wages in more than just agriculture. Construction related trades like masons, iron workers and even electricians have seen substantial decreases in pay since the early 1970’s. If you base your wages on the increases in the price of a postage stamp we all have lost about 50% of the buying power we had just 30 years ago. Our country is a wreck and we aren’t even close to a recovery we need a massive social, economic and governmental overhaul.

 

What about the high crime rate associated with illegals coming from Mexico ? Take a look at the crime rate in Phoenix, Tuscon and other cities near the Mexican border. That’s just another cost associated with having these illegals in this country.

Oh I forgot added medical costs ….

 

There are 10 mln unemployed in the States and about 10-12 mln illegal immigrants. Obviously the problem will not be fixed within a year.
I am a naturalized American, however currenly not living in the USA, for more than a year. My job was moved offshore, and I found the whole process quite brutal.
I think housing forclosures are a much bigger issue at the moment. It devastates entire families and values.

Posted by Krasimir | Report as abusive
 

The borders between canada and the usa should be opened up with free flow of labor and goods like the european union.Defense and security could then be continental instead of cut in the middle

 

Wha, Wha, wha, Americans have not had to really work for a long time. I am sure this attitude will get worse as things get worse. Who can we blame? Its been a great ride…and still is…Get over your your self indulgent, entitled selves.

The reality of global competition has almost nothing to do with public policy etc.

Technology has accelerated the process now a person can do your job, working and middle class for less somewhere else. BTY I own a construction company. Americans, white, black, etc. are demanding and lazy, far far more often than immigrant workers.

Its just not 1975 any more.

 

STOP THE INVASION!!!

UNITED STATES BORDER APPREHENSIONS (Source DHS/CBP)
1987–1,190,488——1995–1,394,554——2003—-93 1,557
1988–1,008,145——1996–1,649,986——2004–1,1 60,395
1989—-954,243——1997–1,412,953——2005–1,18 9,075
1990–1,169,939——1998–1,555,776——2006–1,0 89,902
1991–1,197,875——1999–1,579,010——2007—-87 6,704
1992–1,258,482——2000–1,676,438——2008—-72 3,825
1993–1,327,259——2001–1,266,213——2009—-(b eginning 10/01)
1994–1,094,717——2002—-955,310

FACT: In the last 22 years, over 26 million illegals, have been apprehended, after crossing the border, into our United States.

THE PROBLEM IS: Less than 1, out of 4 illegals, are estimated to have been apprehended.

Mind boggling, isn’t it.

According to the U.S. Immigration Service another 6 million illegals in our country are visa overstays. That is, they got a visa legally in their home country, they came here to visit and then they never left.

In the last 22 years, there have been another 4 million anchor babies born to illegals. Anchor babies are now being born at a rate of 350-400 thousand per year in our United States. All at our expense!!

Then the ANCHOR BABIES qualify for welfare, food stamps, section-8 housing, all at our expense.

American Taxpayers are getting screwed, over, and over, and over, again!!!

Each illegal immigrant, on average, costs taxpayers $9,000 PER YEAR, over, and above, anything they might contribute in taxes!!! A total cost to American taxpayers of over 300 billion dollars each, and every, year.

Posted by Buzzm1 | Report as abusive
 

The government has been lying to you……again.

The BIG LIE……

They keep saying there are only 12 million illegal immigrants in our United States.

FACT: In the last 22 years, over 26 million illegals, have been apprehended, after crossing the border, into our United States. THE PROBLEM IS: Less than 1, out of 4, of the invading illegals, are estimated to have been apprehended.

According to the U.S. Immigration Service another 6 million illegals in our country are visa overstays.

There are, AT LEAST, 40 million illegal immigrants in our United States……….

there are 8.7 million illegals working at on-the-books jobs that they used forged, and/or stolen, identities, to illegally obtain.

there are at least that many more illegals working under the table, for unscrupulous employers, as part of the underground economy.

there are over 5 million illegal immigrant students overcrowding our schools, all at American taxpayer expense.

Illegal immigrants cost American taxpayers over 300 billion dollars a year.

The Bush administration in its final weeks will revive a stalled crackdown on U.S. companies that hire illegal immigrants, issuing a new regulation and asking a federal judge to lift a ban on the measure, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff announced yesterday.

If the court agrees, the government could begin mailing notices to 140,000 employers regarding suspect Social Security numbers used by an estimated 8.7 million workers, pressuring businesses to either resolve discrepancies or fire workers within 90 days.

E-VERIFY MUST BE MANDATED, FOR ALL EMPLOYEES, AND FOR ALL EMPLOYERS!!!

UNEMPLOYED AMERICAN WORKERS NEED THOSE JOBS!!!

Posted by Buzzm1 | Report as abusive
 

I think that the address immigrant, should be rebranded, to enhance a united economic activeness, especially now that the global economy is meltingdown to rubbles. The thought is that jobs in such locations are designed to be effected by these group called immigrants. The earlier every administrative formation identifies the issue of immigration as an aspect of labour movement, and as a compliment of the society,the sooner, financial distress among instituttions are solved. Much depends on economic factors and accurately and correctiy repositioning of investment ideas.

Posted by OHIARA I.C | Report as abusive
 

We have heard from those who believe America needs more immigrants, and those who believe we have too many. The point of the article is that we currently have no easy way of changing the numbers of legal immigrants in response to changes in economic conditions: Congress established a quota in the early 1990s and cannot manage to alter it. This makes no sense. We need some way of adjusting visas so that we have fewer legal immigrants in economic downturns and more when the economy picks up or when we need a particular set of skills. My proposal that the Labor Department be given the authority to set quarterly visa quotas would be one way to address this. No doubt you readers, who are brighter than I, can think of many better ways.

Diana

Posted by Diana Furchtgott-Roth | Report as abusive
 

The work illegal says it all.This lady is so far off base.I am a Caucasian American who started a cleaning business.American small businesses don’t want to hire me because they are having their offices serviced by janitorial companies who are using indentured servitude employees and illegals.These janitorial companies are in no way,shape or form paying these employees minimum wage.As an employer you must pay towards Social Security,Medicare and also cover workman’s comp.This can’t be done when these janitorial companies are only charging $37.50 a service for a huge building while providing only 2 janitors.It is not our government who is screwing the American workers but it is the American companies who are greedy.The more people who become unemployed means that those who have secure,good paying jobs will be paying higer taxes to compensate for their neighbors who lose thier homes and jobs.So it’s pay a fair living wage and employ Americans in the jobs or it’s pay more taxes.You decide,greedy American companies what it’s going to be.

Posted by Donna | Report as abusive
 

MS. Diana Furchtgott-Roth,

I wouldn’t make any conclusions about anyone’s aptitude, many of us have been living with the labor-arbitrage problem for many years.

The problem with your thesis is that employers have been allowed to submit employment advertisements as proof of shortage, while employment growth and college graduation statistics contradict and disprove the shortage claims.

Migration is traditionally born from famine, flood, war and slavery. Employment based immigration is very close to wage-slavery and must be carefully monitored. Bush’s response to discourse from the citizens is to stop publishing the H-1B Charateristics report since FY 2005 (OCT 2004) and withholding the Technology Administration (TA)offshoring report for two years.

You are correct that there is no way to adjust immigration downward in hard economic times, but the government has no problem with creating new categories of employment based visas and increasing immigration.

I submit a partial list:

H1A Temporary worker performing services as a registered nurse = 3 years
H1B Temporary worker of distinguished merit…. other than as a registered nurse = 3 years
H1B1 Free Trade Agreement Professional = 1 year
H1C Shortage area nurse = 3 years
H2A Temporary worker performing agricultural services =1 year
H2B Temporary worker performing other services = 1year
H2R Returning H2B worker = 1year
H3 Trainee = 2 years
L1 Intracompany transferee = 3 years
O1 Person with extraordinary ability in the sciences, art, education, business, or athletics = 3 years
O2 Person accompanying and assisting in the artistic or athletic performance by O1 = 3 years
P1 Internationally recognized athlete or member … entertainment group = 5 years
P2 Artist or entertainer in a reciprocal exchange program = 1 year
P3 Artist or entertainer in a culturally unique program = 1 year
R1 Person in a religious occupation = 5 years
TN NAFTA professional = 1 year (now 3 years)

Moreover, the GATS Mode 4 negotiations will require the U.S. to provide larger static amounts of “service” related visas.

Migrating can be an act of desparation, equity destroyed, not just property ownership, but friends, family and land improvements are abandonded. The migrant has no option to demand the market wage, she has no fall-back support options. Hyper-competitiveness then bankrupts foreign agriculture businesses — creating more economic expulsion. (India is correct to protect its farmers.)

Mismanaged migration is the epicenter of the global financial meltdown. There are thousands of well educated Engineers and Computer specialists who are now expert in immigration, labor arbitrage and economics from personal experience. Yet, when Congress debates employment based immigration, they withhold data and invite a single witness, an out of touch billionare executive who made his fortune stealing technology.

Can you see why there is so much resistance to one-sided, haphazard immigration proposals designed to provide labor cost-controls and new customers for the subprime mortgage industry?

Posted by weaver | Report as abusive
 

There is no shortage of tech workers – there is a shortage of young workers fresh out of college willing to work at the price you are willing to pay. Since the expansion of the H-1B visa program, smart U.S. students have indeed abandoned the IT sector (where according to the BLS, employment has dropped from 3.7 million to 3 million over the past 7 years). The H-1B visa is a labor subsidy – by importing cheaper labor from abroad to keep down U.S. wages in key fields.

Tech is not a field where experience adds much value. Due to fast changing technology, the half life of a software engineer’s knowledge is just 2 to 3 years. Companies have found it far cheaper to lobby government to import cheap young workers from abroad than provide on-going continuous education – again, experience itself adds little value in these fields. Tech has structured itself to always require more new, young workers – even as total employment in the field is collapsing.

Academic economists support temporary workers from abroad – but they all have “tenure” – a guaranteed job for life. If global competition is so great for the rest of us, then perhaps academic economists will be willing to give up their tenure and compete with the world as they wish for the rest of us?

I dare any economist to give up tenure and compete on the world stage as they wish for the rest of us. Until then, forget it.

We’ve watched YouTube video and seen how immigration lawyers advise U.S. firms on how to avoid hiring Americans while complying with the law. The goal is to not hire Americans.

Posted by Ed | Report as abusive
 

To those who think illegal immigrants are taking our good jobs, I grew up in South West Michigan on a small farm. For summer work I picked blue berries, cherries, and strawberries right alongside of immigrants. The work was hard and the pay was not great. The immigrants usually had way more fruit picked at the end of the day then I. A lot of immigrants lived in 24’x24’ single room white buildings we called “help houses”. It was common to see families with a dozen kids packed in the help houses. There was an old help house on the farm where I lived. It did not even have running water. The outhouse next to it was a 2 seat model.

When I went to college some of the brightest students had to really struggle to get green cards. I had an excellent Computer Science teacher who had to move to Australia because he could not get a green card. In the office building, I noticed that most cleaning staff is often of Spanish origin.

Seems to me that it would be quite beneficial for this great country to figure out a way to reward conscientious hard working individuals who what to make something for themselves. Perhaps we need to bring in a lot more immigrants and put them on probation. When they work hard and it becomes obvious they are an asset to the country, let them stay!

Posted by Dave E | Report as abusive
 

The economic elite are demanding their “government subsidy” (more H-1B visas) in the 2002 words of Nobel Economist and free-market advocate Milton Friedman. Another example was the March, 2008 speech by William Gates, III to the House Science and Technology Committee in Rayburn House Office Building. Gates must have demanded more H-1Bs about 50 times in the course of his two hour comments! NumbersUSA.com gives American citzens powerful tools to demand reform of this corruption!

 

I am an electrical engineer with a degree in physics from Florida State University. I have been unemployed for several years because of the H1-B program. In 1990, I remarked to a recruiter that there seemed to be a dozen applicants for every job. He replied “No, it’s more like forty.
This is the way it has been ever since I graduated from college in 1956. I keep reading the ESP, or Engineer Shortage Propaganda, and it never ceases!
There is no shortage of engineers. There is a severe shortage of jobs for engineers!

Posted by John Marson | Report as abusive
 

What Furchtgott-Ross doesn’t mention is that work visa programs such as H-1B are powerful conduits for importing illegal aliens. At the CIS.org website, please review the March, 2008 backgrounder by David Seminara, “No Coyote Needed.” About half of the U.S. illegal alien population are visa overstayers. See the 19 February 2008 article, “Indians a growing face of illegal immigration” by Mike Swift in the Oakland (California) Tribune for more details.

A common-sense legislative proposal, the SAVE Act of 2007 which would require the use of E-Verify for all new hires by larger employers has been opposed by an employer interest advocacy group (CompeteAmerica) that receives funding from Microsoft Corporation. See the PDF version of their 27 February 2008 letter to Speaker Pelosi here http://competeamerica.org/news/alliance_ pr/Speaker_Pelosi_Letter.pdf

 

STOP THE INVASION!!!

BUILD THE FENCE!!!

MANDATE E-VERIFY!!!

Southwest Border Patrol Sector Apprehensions (Source DHS/CBP)
Fiscal Year————-2005———2006———2007——-2008 (ends 9/30)
San Diego————126,879—–142,104—- 152,460— 162,390
El Centro————–55,725——-61,465—– 55,883—– 40,961
Yuma—————–138,492—–118,549—– 37,992—— 8,363*
Tucson ————–439,053—–392,074—- 378,239— 317,696
El Paso—————122,624—–122,256—– 75,464—– 30,312
Marfa ——————10,532——–7,520——- 5,536—— 5,391
Del Rio —————–68,547——42,636—– 22,920—– 20,761
Laredo —————–75,268——74,840—– 56,714——43,658
Rio Grande Valley –134,136—-110,528—— 73,430—– 75,473
Apprehensions—-1,171,386–1,071,972—–858, 638—-705,005

*The Yuma Sector presently has a total of 94 miles of fencing. The difference is apparent.

The Yuma Border Patrol Sector is under control:
——-Yuma Border Patrol Sector Apprehensions——–
———–OCT
FY2009—338
FY2008–1094
FY2007–3478
FY2006–9428
FY2005–8872

The El Paso Border Patrol Sector will soon be under control
——-El Paso Border Patrol Sector Apprehensions——–
———–OCT
FY2009–1468–
*The El Paso Sector of the U.S. Border Patrol is currently in the process of constructing 80 miles of vehicle fencing in New Mexico and approximately 56 miles of pedestrian fencing in New Mexico and Texas, officials said.
FY2008–3605
FY2007–6183
FY2006-11027

Posted by Buzzm1 | Report as abusive
 

SUPPORT THE ALL-AMERICAN STIMULUS PLAN!!!

THE ALL-AMERICAN STIMULUS PLAN WILL PROVIDE JOBS FOR 8.7 MILLION UNEMPLOYED AMERICAN WORKERS AND IT WON’T COST ANYTHING!!!

Illegals, using forged, and/or stolen identities, have illegally obtained up to 8.7 million jobs; these are jobs that Americans will do, jobs in food processing, jobs in manufacturing; these are jobs that rightfully belonged to American workers in the first place.

MANDATE E-VERIFY, FOR ALL EMPLOYEES, AND FOR ALL EMPLOYERS, AND IT WILL GENERATE 8.7 MILLION JOBS FOR UNEMPLOYED AMERICAN WORKERS!!!

THE ALL-AMERICAN STIMULUS PLAN WILL SAVE AMERICAN TAXPAYERS 300 BILLION DOLLARS EACH, AND EVERY, YEAR (the estimated annual cost of illegal immigrants to American taxpayers)!!!

SUPPORT THE ALL-AMERICAN STIMULUS PLAN!!!

REMEMBER, IT WON’T COST ANYTHING!!!

ENFORCE OUR LAWS AGAINST ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION!!!

THERE WILL BE NO AMNESTY!!!

OUR ACCEPTABLE IMMIGRATION REFORM

#1. Make Illegal Entry a Felony Permanently Barring Citizenship
#2. Secure Our Borders with our National Guard!!!
#3. Mandate E-Verify for ALL Employees!!!
#4. Cut Off ALL Public Assistance to Illegals and Their Children!!!
#5. Stop the Underground Economy!!!
#6. End Birthright Citizenship for Illegals!!!
#7. End Chain Migration!!!
#8. Make English our Official Language!!!
#9. Cut Off Federal Funds to Sanctuary Cities!!

NOTHING MORE!!! NOTHING LESS!!!

Posted by Buzzm1 | Report as abusive
 

Let’s not loose sight of the real issue which is, ILLEGAL immigrants need to be kicked out of the country. Go back to your own country and stop using a million and one excuses to break our laws. I couldn’t wait, we were so poor, my kids need a better life, etc……. Go back home, go through the process like millions of others do, then come back and we;ll welcome you with open arms. If you really want a better life, go home and work as hard as you did to get here illegally, to make your country a better place! American politicians get on board with that!

Posted by Booda | Report as abusive
 

Why have you selected the most uninformed post as “Best Comment” when you have been supplied with many other commenters who actually are affected by the programs you speak of?

Posted by Susan | Report as abusive
 

This is the usual “we’re all immigrants” GARBAGE that comes from the out-of-touch-i-only-see-them-at-school liberal elite. She makes no mention of the vast social services bills for illegals (schools/hospitals).

Apparently, the term “immigrants” applies to the euro settlers who killed and otherwise pushed the native population 1000 miles west. And then took most of that land too. Sounds more like “conquering” to me.

Any new immigration thing will fall flat…especially with this bad economy. Plenty of Americans will be willing to sweep floors before it’s all over.

kevin p

Posted by kevin p | Report as abusive
 

It is blatantly apparent that the author of this article supports a global position , other than what is in the interest of Americans, and I question why she should be allowed to talk down to us as if she were ” the chosen one “, to represent what is in American interest when it is clearly not. Americans need the work , they need to have the jobs for THEMSELVES, not Illegal s who would, send money overseas, not vote, and support for American Policies, and eliminate the ability to earn a fair wage, because there will always be some illegal or hungry immigrant, waiting in the shadows to do ANY JOB, AT MUCH LESS THE AMOUNT that you would be willing to do it for, further bringing down the quality of life, that is just bearable now, to that of a minimum wage reality for for those of us who actually listen to this dirt bag.

Posted by Concerned Citizen | Report as abusive
 

Diana Furchtgott-Roth,

The problem is that you start with the false premise that we “need” any foreign workers. With the possible exception of migrant farm labor (which comprises only about 2% of illegal aliens), the U.S. does not “need” any foreign workers.

You claim that “WE would not want the 12 million illegal aliens to return to their native lands.” YES, WE WOULD:

a) Rather than paying any federal income tax, many get “earned income credit” rebates.
b) Clinton and the Bush undermined the global economy by their calls on FHA and FannieMae to institute special loans to “make housing attainable by immigrants and minorities.”
c) Many are holding jobs that unemployed Americans need.
d) Rather than recirulating their paychecks within the local economy, these workers send billions “back home” each year, contributing to our trade/balance deficit.
e) They are bankrupting hospitals by bringing their snot-nosed kids to the emergency rooms (because employers of illegal workers don’t provide medical benefits) and are bankrupting states like California with their use of Medi-Cal.

Although the Hiltons and large AG companies might benefit from cheap illegal labor, they are dumping the true costs of cheap labor on taxpayers.

30 years ago the construction trades: electrician, roofer, framer … provided good union wages – and homes were more affordable. Now these professions have been displaced by low-paid, predominately Spanish-speaking immigrant workers – legal and illegal. There are many Americans who would take good-paying construction jobs.

FACT: DOL is approving H-1b visa LCAs regardless of whether there are Americans available. Many American tech workers, new grads and recently laid off, are having trouble finding work. Regardless, Congress and DOL dumped another 85,000 H-1b workers in the U.S. last month. And last month unemployment in Silicon Valley increased from 6.2 to 6.9%. Cause and effect? Possibly to some extent:

http://www.mercurynews.com/business/ci_1 1041994?nclick_check=1

Silicon Valley unemployment rate jumps to 6.9 percent

By Pete Carey – Mercury News
Posted: 11/21/2008 09:26:49 AM PST

 

Kim Berry,
I am writing a term paper for one of my course about the decline of computer science enrollment.

I feel that people like you really hurt the IT industry in the long term. So please stop.

Take a look at the statistics
http://www.bls.gov/oes/2006/may/table1.p df
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/ocwage.t 03.htm
at $34.71/hr
how can you say that the wage for computer professional are repressed ???? answer me ????
This is the second highest, only management jobs have higher average.
(even higher than healthcare practitioners average!!)

It’s people like you who painted a scary outlook about IT. This scares people away from Engineering and Computer programs. What’s next ??

The quality of students coming into these programs go down… The standards at University for these programs are lowered to accommodate… The graduates quality lower too -> they can’t find jobs, scream louder, join your union -> Scare even more people away -> even lower quality of next new grads -> the cycle continues on and on..
(and YES, I am seeing students studying Computer Science these days a lot less ‘smart’ than in previous years. Many smart highschoolers now are studying Life Sciences at Univ. in order to get rich easily in the future as a doctor..)

I imagine at some point the US will rely solely on foreign workers in IT because of people like you.. you are hurting American long-term technology security!!!!

So please stop all the lies about wages being repressed because of H1B…
And yea, affiliate yourselves with Union likes the auto worker one (UAW). I think it’s very appropriate.

(btw, not all H1Bs work in IT, many many of them work in hospitals too. I only wish the wage repressed were true.. because that will lower the health care cost a lot, guess what, everyone would love it..)

Posted by Trevor H | Report as abusive
 

This is a nation of laws. The immigration law presently in place must be enforced until appropriately ammended. There is no excuse to ignore the law. If you disagree with terms of the law, contact your representatives, complain, work for responsible reform, but do not condone lawless actions. Such an approach has led to the present state of anarchy, with resultant criminality, confusion and encouragement of legal dichotomy.
Do not rest on the unfairness of immigration control, it will always be unfair to someone. We cannot accept all who wish to come here from the rest of the world. Such a policy would overwhelm our economic system to everyone’s detriment. Work out a reasonable compromise.
Congress must accomplish this work. Congressmen (and women) must be held accountable for shaping immigration law. And we must hold them accountable. Vote them out of office if they ignore this problem. Each has taken an oath to uphold this nation and its laws.
Finally, do not allow your buttons to be pushed by the words: honest, well meaning, hard working, family oriented, oppressed, poor, deserving, needey, low wage, fair treatment, and the like. Be ruled instead by equity in granting a limited (set in law) number of immigrants legal residence in this country. Every other country does the same.

Posted by David Allen Lower | Report as abusive
 

While I think controlling flow of foreign workers by H1 visa issuance is a good idea from economical point of view, it doesn’t address an illegal immigration problem. How many H1 visa have been issued to gardeners and car washers? If I understand correctly, H1 visa is issued for positions which require extensive education and/or skills rare in US. Gardening and car washing requires neither of them. Unless the federal government drastically changes their policy on H1 visa, increasing H1 visa quota will just result in more job opportunities for highly educated foreign students, who are unlikely to stay illegally in US anyway by becoming car washers when they can get much better job and status in their home country. I do believe giving more job opportunities to these highly educated people will benefit to American society. However, it is irrelevant to illegal immigration, a main topic of immigration debate. I’m afraid this author is mixing two separate issues.

Posted by AC | Report as abusive
 

Governments from the top down have a brilliant plan on how to handle immigration. Shove everyone else aside and make them this decades ‘most favored of all races’ at of course the expense of those most conveniently left out-not the ones in charge. At the top don’t even bother to apply for disaster aid if you checked Caucasian but across the street FEMA agents are almost rear-ending one another trying to give aid to my Mexican/American buddy Sam…same storm. At the bottom a wreck no insurance if their car still runs they can drive away. Us handcuffed and taken to jail. Am I against a large group of people moving in and not abiding by the laws, drawing a ton of free benefits, having my own rights subjugated to second-class citizen as a result of it? Yes but it’s not them..it’s our own ‘save itself first’ government.

Posted by Gringo | Report as abusive
 

Hey Trevor H,

You cannot take a single snapshot “2006″ and draw any conclusion about wage trends.

You admit that a better and easier path to “riches” is via liberal arts and medicine (and you failed to mention law).

I presume you are not pursuing computer science – if it’s the highest paying profession, why not?

You blame me for “scaring students away from Engineering.” Why don’t you blame HP – laying off Americans while sponsoring foreign workers:

http://www.programmersguild.org/docs/hp_ perm_layoffs.html

Why don’t you blame SJ Mercury News for reporting in 2004 that 25% of tech workers in the area had been forced from the profession (FRAME 2)

http://www.programmersguild.org/docs/slo anwest_kimberry_programmersguild_files/f rame.htm

Why don’t you blame Congresswoman Lofgren, for publicizing that From FY 2001 to FY2005, average H-1b wages fell from $55k to $50k? (FRAME 5 above)

CHALLENGE TO TREVOR:

a) As you cite average programmer wages of $34/hour, how do you explain that average H-1b earn substantially less? Industry claims they are “best and brightest.” Are they underpaid, or underqualified?

b) Please open you Sunday classifieds tomorrow and report back on all the “new grad” (no experience other than a BS degree) required ads in your newspaper. You’d think if things were so bad that we DHS executed an emergency order extending OPT so that foreign students could remain in the USA and work for 30 months – that there would be a few ads for new grads?

 

When it comes to highly skilled jobs, you are not talking about jobs Americans do not choose to do, you are talking about jobs Americans used to love doing and would gladly do again. These Americans were displaced by unneeded foreign guestworkers, brought by their managers precisely for the purpose of replacing them. That’s not what the H-1B was intended for.

Posted by Bart | Report as abusive
 

I hate seeing that tired statistic of 12 million undocumented immigrants. That statistic is years old and was a low-ball estimate then. I’d say we have 30 million undocumented immigrants.

Also to comment on H1-B visa sham. In the year 2000, my colleagues and I were gradually replaced by foreign H1-B visa holders whom we trained to replace us at half our pay. These were coveted engineering positions. The so-called knowledge based jobs, that we worked hard to get. Only to be replaced by broken English speakers with a credential of some foreign university. We don’t need H1-B visas, U.S. companies just want to push down labor costs for skilled American jobs, by making us compete against imported poverty sticken workers from foreign countries. That’s just un-American.

You bet we need to fix immigration. Low paid workers are taking our best jobs right here at home. Unless we want to continue to drive our wages down to third world status, we have to stop this tidal wave of immigrants washing over us. Immigration id fine, but lets moderate it.

Posted by Marc | Report as abusive
 

Kim Berry,
- I gave the link to both 2006 AND 2007
- I failed to mention law?? I was just giving ONE example. Do I have to give an exhaustive list??
- I am studying Computer Science

Finally, where did I say that I support H1B?? All I say is that you people paint a dark picture giving false impression, scaring people away and hurting the industry in the long term. From all of what you are doing, I have the impression just as many others student that the average salary is repressed to the point that it is about 35k/year or so..

Now, for the challenges:
a) Less than 50% of the H1B people work as IT professionals. How can you use the average H1B number to interpolate the average H1B ->IT<- number? As average salary for IT is higher than all others (except management), I would expect the H1B IT number to be higher. And I guess it is 60k. I don’t think that is “low and cheap labor”, I think that’s acceptable.
Seriously, I don’t think companies are willing to save a few thousands a year when the chance for the H1B lottery is only 40%

b) Didn’t the career center at your university tell you that more than 80% of jobs never get posted?? People need to build a network, get out doing stuff for free, finish a project at school, show the potentials with that. A piece of paper with your GPA and the line ‘Bachelor of science in Computer Science at …’ is not enough. In the summer, do some project outside of class instead of a vacation in Europe.

Last words, I do have sympathy for people who lose jobs because they are replaced by younger and faster-thinking kids. IT is a tough place to stay. The way I see it is that most good IT jobs are non-routine, complex, intellectually challenging. Like high performance sports, except that people use brain instead of muscles. And we all know the older we get, the worse our brain gets, just like sports stars, they have to retire when experience can no longer offset their failing physical. It’s sad..

This is the thing that I myself will have to worry too.

And I think that kind of nature of IT jobs really are the problem here. (yes certain H1B might well be used for cheap labor, but it’s not the main problem here) so please, don’t lay blame on H1B or immigration.

Posted by Trevor H | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
  •