<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama: plus ça change?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2009/01/21/obama-plus-ca-change/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2009/01/21/obama-plus-ca-change/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 14:03:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: G</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2009/01/21/obama-plus-ca-change/comment-page-1/#comment-5789</link>
		<dc:creator>G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 17:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=1365#comment-5789</guid>
		<description>This article paints a lovely picture of what could potentially come...the most salient point being that people&#039;s expectations are not necessarily tempered by a realistic outlook of the challenges that Obama faces. 

Nonetheless, despite the &quot;cure&quot; mentality that many hold concerning Obama, the voter choice in the election represented the only choice that had the realistic potential for a positive outcome. McCain and Palin would have only furthered the disastrous course Bush set the U.S. on. 

Separately, I&#039;m very tired of hearing that Bush succeeded in stopping a terrorist attack on U.S. soil again, as if after 9/11 any other President would have  ensured that a second attack occurred. Please. The man had few successes and an endless list of failures.

To the question of: does Barack Obama bring to the White House a vision for change in foreign affairs which will so fundamentally re-jig the puzzle?

Time will tell; but it is certainly a positive thing to hope. The real lesson here is that people need to properly manage their expectations if their hopes are not fulfilled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article paints a lovely picture of what could potentially come&#8230;the most salient point being that people&#8217;s expectations are not necessarily tempered by a realistic outlook of the challenges that Obama faces. </p>
<p>Nonetheless, despite the &#8220;cure&#8221; mentality that many hold concerning Obama, the voter choice in the election represented the only choice that had the realistic potential for a positive outcome. McCain and Palin would have only furthered the disastrous course Bush set the U.S. on. </p>
<p>Separately, I&#8217;m very tired of hearing that Bush succeeded in stopping a terrorist attack on U.S. soil again, as if after 9/11 any other President would have  ensured that a second attack occurred. Please. The man had few successes and an endless list of failures.</p>
<p>To the question of: does Barack Obama bring to the White House a vision for change in foreign affairs which will so fundamentally re-jig the puzzle?</p>
<p>Time will tell; but it is certainly a positive thing to hope. The real lesson here is that people need to properly manage their expectations if their hopes are not fulfilled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Kemmish</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2009/01/21/obama-plus-ca-change/comment-page-1/#comment-5756</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Kemmish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 07:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=1365#comment-5756</guid>
		<description>Even without the situations you describe (and I do hope history remembers me for preventing a wild elephant stampede through MY home town!), would he even want to change?  Even during his primary campaign, he frequently referred to (and I paraphrase), America &quot;regaining&quot; its &quot;rightful&quot; place leading the world.  It would appear that the notion of &quot;manifest destiny&quot; is alive and well, and just as obnoxious to the foreigners with whom Obama will need to work as it ever was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even without the situations you describe (and I do hope history remembers me for preventing a wild elephant stampede through MY home town!), would he even want to change?  Even during his primary campaign, he frequently referred to (and I paraphrase), America &#8220;regaining&#8221; its &#8220;rightful&#8221; place leading the world.  It would appear that the notion of &#8220;manifest destiny&#8221; is alive and well, and just as obnoxious to the foreigners with whom Obama will need to work as it ever was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spooky</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2009/01/21/obama-plus-ca-change/comment-page-1/#comment-5747</link>
		<dc:creator>Spooky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 03:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=1365#comment-5747</guid>
		<description>Did Obama&#039;s supporters consider all of these issues when they voted for him? Unlikely. 

These issues will be answered one way or the other. And not all of Obama&#039;s supporters are going to be happy with what happens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did Obama&#8217;s supporters consider all of these issues when they voted for him? Unlikely. </p>
<p>These issues will be answered one way or the other. And not all of Obama&#8217;s supporters are going to be happy with what happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
