Outsourcing faces new era of scrutiny

January 27, 2009

ericauchard1– Eric Auchard is a Reuters columnist. The opinions expressed are his own –

Outsourcing, Indian-style, is challenged as never before by an erosion in business confidence that makes corporate spending, even to generate quick cost-savings, harder to justify.

“No New Investment” is the order of the day; cost avoidance, the mantra; zero percent, the growth target in the current era of uncertainty.

Software service providers emerged out of the 2000-2002 technology spending bust with sales growing up to 50 percent a year as they won over companies to contract out inefficient operations instead of managing them in-house.

But shocks to the world economy seen over the past 18 months are triggering reassessments of corporate growth expectations, cost considerations and operational accountability. It’s no longer safe to assume that the logic that drove outsourcing in the past will drive it again, once the economy picks up.

Here are reasons why the industry will find it difficult to repeat its past performance in the tough times ahead.

CUTTING BACK ON COST-CUTTING: The paradox at the moment is that spending on services meant to cut costs and save money is itself being squeezed.

Technology Partners International (TPI), a research firm that has tracked the outsourcing industry for 20 years, reported this week that total contract volumes fell 22 percent in the fourth quarter from a year ago.

Just how bad things could get this year is only likely to emerge as corporate customers nail down their 2009 spending plans to vendors in the next two to three months.

“The worst of the IT (information technology) spending slowdown likely remains in front of us as we start the clock on slashed 2009 budgets,” Goldman Sachs warned in a report on the software industry earlier this month.

The conventional wisdom is that companies will eventually need to cost-cut their way out of the economic morass. But as the software services industry has matured over this decade, Goldman analysts say the sector has become more cyclically dependent on overall IT spending, reducing the chances it will be an early winner in any corporate recovery.

Tata Consultancy Services , the largest of the Indian software service providers, estimates that budgets for IT outsourcing will fall between 5 and 20 percent during 2009. Market forecasters predict more declines in store for 2010.

KEY CUSTOMERS IN TROUBLE. One problem is that the $40 billion-a-year industry’s fortunes are heavily linked to the financial sector. Indeed outsourcing started out 30 years ago as a way to help banks automate tangled back-office operations.

But while it grew more diverse in the 1990s, branching into telecom, manufacturing, retail and other industries; banks, brokerages and insurers are still the biggest slice of the market at 20 percent of overall sales, Goldman Sachs estimates.

The finance sector is not just in trouble, it is experiencing a meltdown like no other since the 1970s or perhaps even the 1930s — long before outsourcing itself was invented. And while the credit crisis has left many institutions needing to slash costs, we are seeing a wholesale contraction of the market that will lead to steep reductions in overall demand. Whole parts of the business will disappear and not be replaced.

Moreover, the financial industry’s reliance on governments for bailouts has curtailed the autonomy of bosses. Governments are likely to be dubious should big banks and insurers seek to offshore financial jobs, especially in countries with mounting unemployment. Outsourcers may have to get used to having fewer, and more conservative, financial services customers.

GROWING COMPETITION. Even if volumes hold up, Indian software services may find their market share eroded. After all, Indian firms no longer lay claim to the sort of exclusive cost advantages — lowest cost technical labor — they did.

In recent years, the industry has expanded into other offshore regions such as Southeast Asia, Central Europe and Latin America but promises to handle sensitive work “near-shore” or onsite when customers demand or labour politics require.

Big computer services firms IBM , Hewlett-Packard and Accenture got in on the act by expanding into India or by acquiring offshore companies themselves.

Accenture now has more staff in India than in the United States. Because these firms are agnostic about whether they offer their services offshore or near-shore, they look better placed to navigate global labor politics than Indian rivals.

TRUSTWORTHINESS. Adding to the sector’s troubles is the massive corporate fraud uncovered recently at Satyam Computer Services Ltd , India’s fourth largest software services provider. The scandal has Satyam customers scrambling to find alternative providers.

Other offshore services providers report stepped-up scrutiny from clients of their own corporate governance and financial viability. It has also revived questions about the trustworthiness of Indian accounts and the adequacy of corporate controls.

That’s a big black eye for an industry that sells risk management and corporate governance services as a major client offering. It may raise the risk premium investors require for holding these stocks.

PRICE PRESSURES. Rising competition isn’t the only threat to offshore outsourcers’ margins.
Many of the more profitable, longer-term contracts worth tens or hundreds of millions of dollars are being put on hold as companies scramble to reassess their business strategies.

Customers want more control over projects and are demanding fixed-price deals that are more likely than not to limit margin growth. Infosys, Tata and others say they are doing their best to make up for price cuts by driving greater sales volumes.

The trend is disguised by the long-term nature of many existing software services contracts. Recent reports suggest many customers are scaling back or canceling long-term “mega-deals” until they can get a handle on the impact of economic decline on their own businesses.

The industry is subsisting on short-term, quick-fix contracts aimed at cutting operational costs as fast as possible. These price-sensitive deals are what software services firms had been trying to move away from in favour of higher-value projects to create new businesses for customers, not just manage existing software or customer services.

There is a big cultural change underway in global corporations that may be less friendly to outsourcing. Fallout from the financial crisis is likely to mean far greater pressure on chief executives to run a tighter ship. There’s likely to be less merger activity, less headlong expansion and less resulting need to consolidate organizations using external services.

Chief executives are sure to be more closely scrutinized for the operational choices they make, instead of farming out responsibility to lower level technical managers in order to focus on deal-making.
Inevitably there is a lack of control involved in contracting business operations out around the globe. This more constrained environment could be less favorable for outsourcing than downturns of the past.

– At the time of publication Eric Auchard did not own any direct investments in securities mentioned in this article. He may be an owner indirectly as an investor in a fund. For previous columns, click here. –


We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/

America need to remember that its only a part of the world and not the world. Protectionism is always used to defend self interests only and it will be the biggest loser if such policies get enforced.

Posted by S Trader | Report as abusive

The biggest picture is…they’re moving out of India. And stayed in a beautiful tropical island. No longer serving American firms.

Posted by Olivia Rosaroso | Report as abusive

Hello World. It is interesting to read the comments from educated Indians in defense of their country and from working class Americans blaming others for their problems. Both viewpoints are right to a degree. I wonder what comments would be made by Chinese workers making toothbrushes and toys for ten cents an hour. Indians and Chinese are naturally defensive about their new-found role in the global economy and want Americans to look elsewhere for someone to blame. Americans have been internally outsourcing manual labor jobs to illegal aliens and automating every clerical job once held by educated white-collar employees. Computers have probably cost Americans more high-paying jobs than India and China put together. American CEOs have been brutally focused on shareholder interests and have done everything possible, legally and illegally, to artificially elevate their stock prices. CEOs who do not lay off thousands of workers, outsource, automate, and consolidate are replaced by CEOs who will do these things. When corporations run the government through lobbyists and the ordinary civilians are denied basic needs like health insurance and pensions it is called fascism. Global overpopulation, modern transportation, and the internet have reduced the value of human labor to near zero. We are entering a new century where jobs and resources will become so scarce our children will starve. I miss the 20th century.

Posted by Bob Johnson | Report as abusive

Perhaps you should remember that you’re in no place to tell America what it needs to do.

Admittedly, it was a couple years back, but in a competition among computer programmers, Poland came in first and MIT second while the Indians were not in the top ten. When the company I worked for computerized its operations, it cost them a few million dollars (a couple years back, remember) and six years to get a truly awkward program. I do wonder if custom programming farmed out to India is a false lead, and the input from the users in a generic program shouldn’t be tried first.

Posted by Bill Williams | Report as abusive

I wholly agree with Ms Rosaroso, with emphasis on our political system relying on the input of corporate lobbyist to dictate what earmarked bills will be pushed through the house and senate. Unfortunately, americans, while capable of independent thought, are willingly allowing themselves to be influenced by the next smooth-talking politician or media personality. Even in the face of facts, we swallow the latest biased report or speech as if it were the bare truth. (i.e. doing nothing about political scandals, following a notorious bill through congress while a dozen more like pass under our noses, or electing officials based on their good looks/personalities, NOT on their experience and track record).

Posted by Conrad | Report as abusive

Look at the recent headlines. Even a conservative Republican, Senator Grassley, is complaining that – perhaps – Microsoft is laying off at the same time as a morose Bill Gates went before Congress to plead for more H-1B visas. Just look at the “you’re technically the best” ( US workers are morons, Bill?) hype Microsoft gives to hire more for its burgeoning facilities in India. Poor, filthy rich Bill.

It is sad, too, that so very many of us helped to create this ‘nightmare’ by our development of satellite communications. It used to take days, even weeks, to move large quantities of data to and from overseas facilities.

Now, we dial an 800 number for technical support and get connected to the home of an Indian contractor. In a real sense, we sealed our own fate.

Posted by Bernard Campbell | Report as abusive

I’m waiting for the ‘third world’ countries to revolt, much as the OPEC nations did when they found out we were exploiting their oil at ‘bargain basement’ prices.

As people of other countries become more aware that we’ve migrated slavery abroad, they’ll rise up – and put us into the same, if not greater, ‘crisis’ than we had with the oil embargo of the 1970′s.

We’ve hired these people to come here, too. So very many of them live together in apartments filled only with mattresses and laptops.

Posted by Bernard Campbell | Report as abusive

The main point is this: now that American (and European) taxpayers are bailing out financial institutions, automobile companies, and other ailing institutions, the taxpayers want their money spent on local jobs, not outsourced jobs. The goal is no longer maximum efficiency for institutions, but rather maximum economic stimulus using local labor pools. Debating the merits of outsourcing is moot. CEOs, CIOs, and CFOs should no longer have the option of outsourcing when they are receiving bailout money from taxpayers.

Posted by Greg Gordon | Report as abusive

I keep listening to the news bulletin speak about receiving free online grant applications so I have been looking around for the most excellent site to get one. Could you advise me please, where could i acquire some?

“Those I called desired to take hold of a property and put these individuals available without any subsequent intending according to risk tolerance and / or the things i asked to utilize any property more than a long time,Half inch she states that. “These were being top quality counselors exactly who just didn’t view the everyday life intending costs associated with the serious obstacles of growing aged the united states. With its model, these would not be certain that a funds would certainly be as durable after i could need the idea in order to.

Your new mobile application can provide new traffic into your location, keep old customers coming back, and get your prospects to spend more cash with you more often.