<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: China stock jitters look overdone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2009/09/02/china-stock-jitters-look-overdone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2009/09/02/china-stock-jitters-look-overdone/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 17:40:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casper Lab</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2009/09/02/china-stock-jitters-look-overdone/comment-page-1/#comment-22624</link>
		<dc:creator>Casper Lab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 14:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=5151#comment-22624</guid>
		<description>The Chinese economy is already flawed on 10 levels, atleast. With P/E&#039;s like that and the present growth rate, it points to one outcome: cash flow problems. Speaking of which, the US bond book is astounding, the interest payments and close-out maturities must put a lot of pressure on the US cash flow, let alone the the subtle, calculated and callous reverse takeover of US public sector cash flow. Hopefully the US private sector won&#039;t fall for that one in future with dividend payments and share buybacks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Chinese economy is already flawed on 10 levels, atleast. With P/E&#8217;s like that and the present growth rate, it points to one outcome: cash flow problems. Speaking of which, the US bond book is astounding, the interest payments and close-out maturities must put a lot of pressure on the US cash flow, let alone the the subtle, calculated and callous reverse takeover of US public sector cash flow. Hopefully the US private sector won&#8217;t fall for that one in future with dividend payments and share buybacks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harold R. Berk</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2009/09/02/china-stock-jitters-look-overdone/comment-page-1/#comment-22599</link>
		<dc:creator>Harold R. Berk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 08:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=5151#comment-22599</guid>
		<description>The Shanghai exchange is rising dramatically this morning by 5.5%, and the frequent high and low swings suggests an instability that is hard to evaluate, but it is clear the daily swings are not an accurate gauge of economic trends in China.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Shanghai exchange is rising dramatically this morning by 5.5%, and the frequent high and low swings suggests an instability that is hard to evaluate, but it is clear the daily swings are not an accurate gauge of economic trends in China.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haager Neder</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2009/09/02/china-stock-jitters-look-overdone/comment-page-1/#comment-22595</link>
		<dc:creator>Haager Neder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 07:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=5151#comment-22595</guid>
		<description>It is not the first time to see Chinese stocks rising without support or diving without obvious pressure. As Chinese investors always say that they are actually &#039;playing&#039; with stocks instead of &#039;investing&#039; in stocks. Such turbulent-producing ideology may &#039;play&#039; its leading role right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not the first time to see Chinese stocks rising without support or diving without obvious pressure. As Chinese investors always say that they are actually &#8216;playing&#8217; with stocks instead of &#8216;investing&#8217; in stocks. Such turbulent-producing ideology may &#8216;play&#8217; its leading role right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: who</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2009/09/02/china-stock-jitters-look-overdone/comment-page-1/#comment-22593</link>
		<dc:creator>who</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 07:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=5151#comment-22593</guid>
		<description>Government will be reluctant to &quot;undermining&quot; the economy as the money for reinvigorating the economy, stock markets and housing markets comes from government in its many forms.   If it does undermine the markets then it would get its money back and banks will laded with bad debt.  Sounds familiar...similar occurring about ten years ago.

Now that all loans have been invested in the markets volumes will drop off sharply and any noise about curbing excessive speculation then markets will dive. 

Corporate earnings - can you believe them?  Can they support their PE?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Government will be reluctant to &#8220;undermining&#8221; the economy as the money for reinvigorating the economy, stock markets and housing markets comes from government in its many forms.   If it does undermine the markets then it would get its money back and banks will laded with bad debt.  Sounds familiar&#8230;similar occurring about ten years ago.</p>
<p>Now that all loans have been invested in the markets volumes will drop off sharply and any noise about curbing excessive speculation then markets will dive. </p>
<p>Corporate earnings &#8211; can you believe them?  Can they support their PE?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casper Lab</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2009/09/02/china-stock-jitters-look-overdone/comment-page-1/#comment-22591</link>
		<dc:creator>Casper Lab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 06:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=5151#comment-22591</guid>
		<description>Excellent piece ! It ties in international finance with local corporate finance, shows the interrelationships between markets, stocks and bonds and legal aspects. The price-earnings is astounding, hopefully most of the earnings are free cash flows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent piece ! It ties in international finance with local corporate finance, shows the interrelationships between markets, stocks and bonds and legal aspects. The price-earnings is astounding, hopefully most of the earnings are free cash flows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
