Don’t believe the hype

September 17, 2009

MARKETS-STOCKS/– Neil Unmack and Agnes T. Crane are Reuters columnists. The views expressed are their own —

By Neil Unmack and Agnes T. Crane
When some of the most influential financial thinkers of our time failed to call one of the biggest bubbles since the Great Depression before it burst, a little skepticism about the recent run-up in stocks is a healthy antidote to the cheerleading that typically accompanies big gains.

Given the enormous size of the last bubble, the current round of inflation in financial markets perhaps should be called by another name — maybe “bubblette” would better suit the times.

The hallmarks, though, are similar: Access to cheap credit helps re-inflate depressed prices, but eventually the explanations for extended gains start looking flimsy. Stocks started entering that territory in August when many pointed to better-than-expected earnings to justify the surge in prices that have taken major gauges to their best levels for the year.

The price-to-earnings ratio for the S&P 500 currently stands around 26.5 based on operating earnings for 12 months through June. That’s well above the historical average of 19.26, according to S&P senior index analyst Howard Silverblatt.

To get back to normal, the economic recovery will have to be powerful enough for earnings to meet more optimistic expectations. The price-earnings ratio for the FTSE 100 is still just below its historic average, but nevertheless stands at its highest since July 2004.

There are good reasons to rejoice about the recovery in stocks — for one, they make last year’s losses less painful. But there are also plenty of reasons to think the market will pull back in the near term, and to foresee a rude awakening if the much talked-about V-shaped recovery fails to deliver.

- The consumer is key. Still buried under a mountain of debt and daunted by the prospect of joblessness, consumers aren’t likely to return to their old spending habits. More saving and less spending means low growth, excess capacity, and falling prices, all of which are bad news for equities.

- Unprecedented fiscal and monetary stimulus are distorting reality. While some markets have returned to their levels before Lehman Brothers collapsed a year ago, much of the stimulus behind the recovery is still in place to keep money flowing into even some of the riskier asset classes, such as high-yield debt and stocks.

Start taking the various props away, which will begin to happen this autumn, and investors’ appetite for risk will diminish.

- Ridiculously low government bond rates and rock bottom interest rates in the developed world have pushed investors to look elsewhere for yield. But this can’t last forever. Eventually central banks will raise rates, while increased borrowing needs still lurk as a potential flash point for bond vigilantes who want to be compensated for the risk of future inflation.

- Funding markets, while much improved, still aren’t working properly. While many companies have been able to refinance their short-term debt, borrowers in real estate markets are still facing a funding void left by the collapse of the shadow banking system.

High-yield companies in the United States and Europe face far higher borrowing costs, and must also refinance or pay down a wall of debt falling due in coming years. Commercial real estate, in particular, faces daunting maturing debt.

Unless more sources of alternative funding can be found, the result will be higher borrowing costs, more defaults and bank losses, and more corporate failures. Companies in general will focus on keeping their creditors sweet, rather than doling out cash to shareholders.

Stock buybacks have sunk to their lowest level since 1998, when Standard & Poor’s first started tracking the data.

- Unemployment rates are expected to stay high. Economists view unemployment data as a lagging indicator, but this time may be different. A persistently high unemployment rate will likely keep anxiety high among consumers who stretched themselves thin during the boom years. Even if it steadies, the unemployment rate could keep consumers on the straight and narrow.

- Follow the smart money. Insiders, such as company management, are selling at the highest rate since before the crisis kicked off in 2007. Sure, the sellers may have their own personal reasons for dumping stock, or they may know what is going on better than anyone.

Some of these arguments were equally true in March — since then the FTSE has gained 45 percent. Investors who avoided stocks for sound fundamental reasons back then have been dealt a cruel hand by the recent upswing.

The cheap liquidity and confidence that drove the rally may well persist for some time, or even carry the market higher if third-quarter earnings beat expectations.

Still, investors who missed the equity market party should be doubly wary of joining in now that the good times may be over.

2 comments

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/

Good article.

‘doling out cash to shareholders’ – the way it is going now, they will have to dole in, and quite soon’.

My feeling is that inflation stats have always been incorrect and quoted too low, for whatever reason. As an example, if we are really in ‘deflation’, the Fischer Effect kicks out real returns higher than nominal returns for bonds. That is obscure though. I think we have been in hyper-inflation for a long time, we just thought things were cheap, so we bought them on credit. Terrible domino effect. Yes, and the derivatives bit us, but that mistake was made by an eclectic group of Ken and Barbie gamblers.

Posted by Casper Lab | Report as abusive

The recent rise of the stock market has been due mainly to shorts squeeze and speculation.
How can the solution for debt and consumption be more debt and more consumption?
The system is the same, the debt hasn’t disappeared. The debt is still out there. The rise of the stock market hasn’t solved the problem, it made it worse.
Officials want consumers to start to spend again.
But government leaders can hardly afford
to urge consumers to spend, spend, spend.
Excessive consumer spending for the
last 25 years is one of the main reasons
for the current financial mess and the
worst recession since the 1930s.
If everyone saves and few
spend, the economy suffers , if we start again with excessive spending we never get out of this mess.

Posted by Gastone Ciucci Neri | Report as abusive