<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t believe the hype</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2009/09/17/dont-believe-the-hype/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2009/09/17/dont-believe-the-hype/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 19:36:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gastone Ciucci Neri</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2009/09/17/dont-believe-the-hype/comment-page-1/#comment-24488</link>
		<dc:creator>Gastone Ciucci Neri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 20:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=5363#comment-24488</guid>
		<description>The recent rise of the stock market has been due mainly to shorts squeeze and speculation.
How can the solution for debt and consumption be more debt and more consumption? 
The system is the same, the debt hasn&#039;t disappeared. The debt is still out there. The rise of the stock market hasn&#039;t solved the problem, it made it worse.
Officials want consumers to start to spend again.
But government leaders can hardly afford
to urge consumers to spend, spend, spend.
Excessive consumer spending for the
last 25 years is one of the main reasons
for the current financial mess and the
worst recession since the 1930s.  
If everyone saves  and few
spend, the economy suffers , if we start again with excessive spending we never get out of this mess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The recent rise of the stock market has been due mainly to shorts squeeze and speculation.<br />
How can the solution for debt and consumption be more debt and more consumption?<br />
The system is the same, the debt hasn&#8217;t disappeared. The debt is still out there. The rise of the stock market hasn&#8217;t solved the problem, it made it worse.<br />
Officials want consumers to start to spend again.<br />
But government leaders can hardly afford<br />
to urge consumers to spend, spend, spend.<br />
Excessive consumer spending for the<br />
last 25 years is one of the main reasons<br />
for the current financial mess and the<br />
worst recession since the 1930s.<br />
If everyone saves  and few<br />
spend, the economy suffers , if we start again with excessive spending we never get out of this mess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casper Lab</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2009/09/17/dont-believe-the-hype/comment-page-1/#comment-24393</link>
		<dc:creator>Casper Lab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=5363#comment-24393</guid>
		<description>Good article.

&#039;doling out cash to shareholders’ - the way it is going now, they will have to dole in, and quite soon&#039;.

My feeling is that inflation stats have always been incorrect and quoted too low, for whatever reason. As an example, if we are really in &#039;deflation&#039;, the Fischer Effect kicks out real returns higher than nominal returns for bonds. That is obscure though. I think we have been in hyper-inflation for a long time, we just thought things were cheap, so we bought them on credit. Terrible domino effect. Yes, and the derivatives bit us, but that mistake was made by an eclectic group of Ken and Barbie gamblers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article.</p>
<p>&#8216;doling out cash to shareholders’ &#8211; the way it is going now, they will have to dole in, and quite soon&#8217;.</p>
<p>My feeling is that inflation stats have always been incorrect and quoted too low, for whatever reason. As an example, if we are really in &#8216;deflation&#8217;, the Fischer Effect kicks out real returns higher than nominal returns for bonds. That is obscure though. I think we have been in hyper-inflation for a long time, we just thought things were cheap, so we bought them on credit. Terrible domino effect. Yes, and the derivatives bit us, but that mistake was made by an eclectic group of Ken and Barbie gamblers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
