<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dollar faces long journey downward</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2009/10/13/dollar-faces-long-journey-downward/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2009/10/13/dollar-faces-long-journey-downward/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 02:10:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2009/10/13/dollar-faces-long-journey-downward/comment-page-2/#comment-25963</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 17:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=5527#comment-25963</guid>
		<description>So much of this discussion is overblown. The U.S. is the most innovative and hard working on the planet. Our currency is the most transparent and trusted. Period. Until China can produce something other than the plastic garbage sold at big box stores and the EU has a longer work week (and ends its bickering), the USD will continue to be the currency of choice. Another point, oil&#039;s influence on the USD stops when we find transparency (working according to the EIA)- or an alternative abundant and practical energy resource.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So much of this discussion is overblown. The U.S. is the most innovative and hard working on the planet. Our currency is the most transparent and trusted. Period. Until China can produce something other than the plastic garbage sold at big box stores and the EU has a longer work week (and ends its bickering), the USD will continue to be the currency of choice. Another point, oil&#8217;s influence on the USD stops when we find transparency (working according to the EIA)- or an alternative abundant and practical energy resource.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: enoch apaibinyesim</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2009/10/13/dollar-faces-long-journey-downward/comment-page-2/#comment-25713</link>
		<dc:creator>enoch apaibinyesim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 23:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=5527#comment-25713</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Bell</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2009/10/13/dollar-faces-long-journey-downward/comment-page-2/#comment-25676</link>
		<dc:creator>The Bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 08:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=5527#comment-25676</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s so much talk  of late about the dollar falling, it surely follows that somebody has a vested interest in seeing it go that way. One doesn&#039;t have to look too hard to figure out who might be involved. [Hint: it&#039;s not who it should be.]

Amid all the chatter, what seldom gets mentioned is the degree to which our currency policy now quivers coyly in the hands of an unregulated US finance industry, rather than those of the Treasury. 

Underpublicized also are the long-term risks of this presumptuous trend toward total privatization of the national interest. It&#039;s been going on so long now, it&#039;s just &quot;one of those things&quot;.

With the Treasury Department devoting obscene amounts of its time and resources to massaging certain parts of private financial services industries in a suspiciously sensuous fashion, instead of focusing on the vast and troublesome domestic implications of an unruly greenback&#039;s mood swings careening entirely out of public control, the overall situation becomes that much more volatile and vulnerable to catastrophic outcome.

Clearly this concerns the banks not one whit. Boldly using taxpayer funds as gaming chips, you&#039;ll see them short the U.S. Dollar wholesale in a New York minute. And damn the consequences - as long as they come out ahead on paper, they really don&#039;t give a hoot how low the domestic currency sinks and at what inevitable cost to the American public.

Europe On $500 A Day, anyone?


(At the time of publication the writer didn&#039;t seem to have too many dollars.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s so much talk  of late about the dollar falling, it surely follows that somebody has a vested interest in seeing it go that way. One doesn&#8217;t have to look too hard to figure out who might be involved. [Hint: it's not who it should be.]</p>
<p>Amid all the chatter, what seldom gets mentioned is the degree to which our currency policy now quivers coyly in the hands of an unregulated US finance industry, rather than those of the Treasury. </p>
<p>Underpublicized also are the long-term risks of this presumptuous trend toward total privatization of the national interest. It&#8217;s been going on so long now, it&#8217;s just &#8220;one of those things&#8221;.</p>
<p>With the Treasury Department devoting obscene amounts of its time and resources to massaging certain parts of private financial services industries in a suspiciously sensuous fashion, instead of focusing on the vast and troublesome domestic implications of an unruly greenback&#8217;s mood swings careening entirely out of public control, the overall situation becomes that much more volatile and vulnerable to catastrophic outcome.</p>
<p>Clearly this concerns the banks not one whit. Boldly using taxpayer funds as gaming chips, you&#8217;ll see them short the U.S. Dollar wholesale in a New York minute. And damn the consequences &#8211; as long as they come out ahead on paper, they really don&#8217;t give a hoot how low the domestic currency sinks and at what inevitable cost to the American public.</p>
<p>Europe On $500 A Day, anyone?</p>
<p>(At the time of publication the writer didn&#8217;t seem to have too many dollars.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2009/10/13/dollar-faces-long-journey-downward/comment-page-2/#comment-25621</link>
		<dc:creator>Casper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 11:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=5527#comment-25621</guid>
		<description>I would be interested in seeing what the components of production, imports, consumption and exports are for the US. Maybe a long journey downward will be a pleasant one, like a tired old 737 jet coming in for its last landing to be replaced by a zippy new technology and way of thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would be interested in seeing what the components of production, imports, consumption and exports are for the US. Maybe a long journey downward will be a pleasant one, like a tired old 737 jet coming in for its last landing to be replaced by a zippy new technology and way of thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2009/10/13/dollar-faces-long-journey-downward/comment-page-2/#comment-25601</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 20:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=5527#comment-25601</guid>
		<description>The reason the dollar is dropping in value is more due to the fact that in the world economy --(where all the different currencies of each country are balanced out and each currencies worth is put against the other.)-- has changed ever since the advent of the EURO &lt;-- which took away nearly 50 currencies in Europe, the dollar has been dropping. they basically tranformed their entire continent into one big economic powerhouse and it worked for them instead of us being rich now they are because our dollar has to compete against the EURO as a whole as opposed to the many different currencies there used to be It has nothing to do with welfare or obama (although printing &lt;-new money- our way out of debt like his administration is trying to do is why the USSR collapsed).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason the dollar is dropping in value is more due to the fact that in the world economy &#8211;(where all the different currencies of each country are balanced out and each currencies worth is put against the other.)&#8211; has changed ever since the advent of the EURO &lt;&#8211; which took away nearly 50 currencies in Europe, the dollar has been dropping. they basically tranformed their entire continent into one big economic powerhouse and it worked for them instead of us being rich now they are because our dollar has to compete against the EURO as a whole as opposed to the many different currencies there used to be It has nothing to do with welfare or obama (although printing &lt;-new money- our way out of debt like his administration is trying to do is why the USSR collapsed).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jones</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2009/10/13/dollar-faces-long-journey-downward/comment-page-2/#comment-25591</link>
		<dc:creator>Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=5527#comment-25591</guid>
		<description>Mark said: 
“Denmark can afford its expensive social programs not because it’s propped up by the US - which has no troops here - but because Denmark’s citizens pay high taxes to support them. In turn, they can afford to do that because the economy is robust…”

Not exactly – where do you think the Danes get the money to pay for those social programs?

The U.S. has a $3.28 billion trade deficit with Denmark.     The U.S. is everyone’s biggest trade partner and we a have a deficit with just about everyone. 

Indirectly, WE are paying for Europe’s social programs.

All of these happy little European Socialist states can maintain their nanny-ness because they are all attached to America’s big dirty Capitalist Economy like parasites. 

If the U.S. went socialist – the Global Economy would fall apart.  Socialism needs to sell to a Capitalist economy to survive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark said:<br />
“Denmark can afford its expensive social programs not because it’s propped up by the US &#8211; which has no troops here &#8211; but because Denmark’s citizens pay high taxes to support them. In turn, they can afford to do that because the economy is robust…”</p>
<p>Not exactly – where do you think the Danes get the money to pay for those social programs?</p>
<p>The U.S. has a $3.28 billion trade deficit with Denmark.     The U.S. is everyone’s biggest trade partner and we a have a deficit with just about everyone. </p>
<p>Indirectly, WE are paying for Europe’s social programs.</p>
<p>All of these happy little European Socialist states can maintain their nanny-ness because they are all attached to America’s big dirty Capitalist Economy like parasites. </p>
<p>If the U.S. went socialist – the Global Economy would fall apart.  Socialism needs to sell to a Capitalist economy to survive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mufaso</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2009/10/13/dollar-faces-long-journey-downward/comment-page-2/#comment-25590</link>
		<dc:creator>Mufaso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=5527#comment-25590</guid>
		<description>Folks, get ready for the one-world government. Devaluing the dollar is one of the final steps toward realizing this monstrosity. The North-American Union, the merge of Canada, the U.S., and Mexico into a super-economic (and ultimately governmental) power, is the next step. Our national sovereignty will be destroyed. I urge readers to get a copy of Jerome Corsi&#039;s America For Sale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Folks, get ready for the one-world government. Devaluing the dollar is one of the final steps toward realizing this monstrosity. The North-American Union, the merge of Canada, the U.S., and Mexico into a super-economic (and ultimately governmental) power, is the next step. Our national sovereignty will be destroyed. I urge readers to get a copy of Jerome Corsi&#8217;s America For Sale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Willis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2009/10/13/dollar-faces-long-journey-downward/comment-page-2/#comment-25587</link>
		<dc:creator>Willis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 12:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=5527#comment-25587</guid>
		<description>Having a little trouble understanding how trade imbalance caused all of this?

Here&#039;s a simple (but accurate) explanation:

After a currency debacle in 1998 left its economy in tatters, Beijing decided to radically restructure its financial relationship with the West. Policymakers pegged the value of China&#039;s currency to the dollar, which had the effect of keeping it artificially low.

The cheap renminbi made it irresistibly inexpensive for U.S. companies to manufacture goods in China, even after shipping costs. As more companies shifted their operations to China, the U.S. manufacturing base was hollowed out in the name of globalization and profitability. Americans who once enjoyed high-paying factory jobs moved on to lower-paying service jobs.

China didn&#039;t need much of anything made in America, so instead of buying cars from Detroit and furniture from North Carolina with its factory profits, it bought Treasury bills. The purchase of all those bills drove down U.S. interest rates. So as middle-class and blue-collar Americans saw their wages stagnate or decline, they discovered they could still keep their old lifestyles by borrowing.

Over the past decade, Americans were able to outspend their incomes by easily rolling their debts forward through serial home refinancing. The situation was never ideal, but it worked as long as the value of their collateral -- their homes -- kept rising. 

As long as China kept buying Fannie Mae (FNM, news, msgs), Freddie Mac (FRE, news, msgs) and Treasury credits, the scheme worked in a strange and beautiful way: Our driveways filled up with cars and boats, shopping malls spread out across the suburban landscape, and the retailer with the closest ties to China, Wal-Mart (WMT, news, msgs), became the United States&#039; largest company.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having a little trouble understanding how trade imbalance caused all of this?</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a simple (but accurate) explanation:</p>
<p>After a currency debacle in 1998 left its economy in tatters, Beijing decided to radically restructure its financial relationship with the West. Policymakers pegged the value of China&#8217;s currency to the dollar, which had the effect of keeping it artificially low.</p>
<p>The cheap renminbi made it irresistibly inexpensive for U.S. companies to manufacture goods in China, even after shipping costs. As more companies shifted their operations to China, the U.S. manufacturing base was hollowed out in the name of globalization and profitability. Americans who once enjoyed high-paying factory jobs moved on to lower-paying service jobs.</p>
<p>China didn&#8217;t need much of anything made in America, so instead of buying cars from Detroit and furniture from North Carolina with its factory profits, it bought Treasury bills. The purchase of all those bills drove down U.S. interest rates. So as middle-class and blue-collar Americans saw their wages stagnate or decline, they discovered they could still keep their old lifestyles by borrowing.</p>
<p>Over the past decade, Americans were able to outspend their incomes by easily rolling their debts forward through serial home refinancing. The situation was never ideal, but it worked as long as the value of their collateral &#8212; their homes &#8212; kept rising. </p>
<p>As long as China kept buying Fannie Mae (FNM, news, msgs), Freddie Mac (FRE, news, msgs) and Treasury credits, the scheme worked in a strange and beautiful way: Our driveways filled up with cars and boats, shopping malls spread out across the suburban landscape, and the retailer with the closest ties to China, Wal-Mart (WMT, news, msgs), became the United States&#8217; largest company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Schumann Rafizadeh</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2009/10/13/dollar-faces-long-journey-downward/comment-page-2/#comment-25584</link>
		<dc:creator>Schumann Rafizadeh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 11:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=5527#comment-25584</guid>
		<description>What happened to the wonderful SERVICE ECONOMY that was supposed to have replaced the dirty manufacturing and industrial economy? I guess that was all hot air by scumbag attorneys turned politicians and contributed more to Global Warming than actually creating jobs and prosperity!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happened to the wonderful SERVICE ECONOMY that was supposed to have replaced the dirty manufacturing and industrial economy? I guess that was all hot air by scumbag attorneys turned politicians and contributed more to Global Warming than actually creating jobs and prosperity!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: harold</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2009/10/13/dollar-faces-long-journey-downward/comment-page-2/#comment-25583</link>
		<dc:creator>harold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 11:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=5527#comment-25583</guid>
		<description>The US has for the longest time created an environment for parasites (people on public assistance)to grow. Now I know there are people on public assistance that actually deserve and need it, but, there is a large percentage  of people on it that could well do without it. Our politicians are going to have to come up with some restrictions to thin the parasites out......... People and corporate parasites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US has for the longest time created an environment for parasites (people on public assistance)to grow. Now I know there are people on public assistance that actually deserve and need it, but, there is a large percentage  of people on it that could well do without it. Our politicians are going to have to come up with some restrictions to thin the parasites out&#8230;&#8230;&#8230; People and corporate parasites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
