Opinion

The Great Debate

Awakening Africa’s sleeping agricultural giant

November 10, 2009

Hans Binswanger is the former senior adviser to the World Bank on rural development in Africa. He is currently an independent agriculture and development consultant based in South Africa. The opinions expressed are his own.

The World Bank’s recent study of the prospects of commercial agriculture in Africa focused primarily on the Guinea Savannahs that cover some 600 million hectares, of which about 400 million can be used for agriculture. Less than 10 percent of this area is currently cropped, making it one of the largest underused agricultural land reserves in the world.

During the past four decades, two similar, backward, landlocked, and largely rain-fed agricultural regions developed rapidly and became international agricultural powerhouses: The Cerrado of Brazil and Northeast Thailand. The difficult agro-ecological conditions, remoteness, and poverty levels of the two regions were successfully overcome, and the same should happen in the Guinea Savannahs.

The study found that farm level production costs in Africa are competitive, with family farmers generally having lower costs than commercial farmers. African farmers are also generally competitive in domestic and regional markets, but not competitive in international markets. Logistics costs are much higher than in Brazil and Thailand on account of inadequate transport, processing and marketing infrastructure; lack of competition in vehicle import and trucking industries; cumbersome transport regulations; and the need to pay bribes at border cross¬ings and police checkpoints.

In addition to resolving these problems, awakening of this sleeping giant requires appropriate agricultural policy regimes, greater state leadership and greater development expenditures for family farmers, greater involvement of local governments, communities, and the private sector.

Despite recent efforts, mainly by foreign investors, to launch large-scale agribusinesses in Africa, the study found no evidence that the large-scale farming model is either necessary or even particularly promising for Africa. The apparently successful settler farms of eastern and southern Africa were nurtured by streams of preferential policies, subsidies, and supporting investments.

Nevertheless, large-scale farming, along with other alternatives, may be considered in Africa in three circumstances:

  • When economies of scale are present in processing of perishable crops, as in “plantation crops” (sugar, oil palm, tea, bananas and other horticultural crops for export). The alternative to plantations is contract farming that is widely practiced across the world. Note that plantations in the Philippines and Indonesia have lost competitiveness to family farmers in Thailand.
  • When Africa’s producers must compete in overseas markets that have stringent quality requirements and demand traceability back to the farm. While this may be difficult in to do via contract in farming, it is the predominant mode for the rapidly growing exports of high value commodities in China.
  • When land must be developed in areas with few people. Three solutions are possible: Immigration, as in the Guinea Savannas of West Africa, machine hire from private contractors or larger farmers, as is practiced all over the World, or large scale commercial farming.

If large scale farming is used to solve any of these problems, politically difficult problems are likely to arise in land allocation to commercial farms. Virtually all areas are claimed by some individuals or groups or used in some way. For investors, the alternative to direct involvement in farming are investments in seed and other input sectors, storage, processing and marketing, often involving contract farming.

Much of the technology that family farmers will need is already on the shelf, such as improved seeds, mechanization via animal draft or tractors, low on no till technology, fertilizers and pesticides. But dissemination requires better services and marketing facilities. Low input technologies have little potential in areas of medium to high soil fertility and are more applicable to low fertility environments. Since the main market opportunities for African farmers in the medium term will be in domestic and regional markets, organic farming will primarily have potential in niche markets in the developed world.

In the longer run African agriculture faces a daunting science and technology challenge to maintain and increase its competitiveness and to deal with climate change: It has more environments, more crops, more pests and more diseases than any other continent and will need to find its own technological solutions rather than rely on borrowing.

This will require much larger expenditures on science, research, and science education. Genetically modified organisms will be an important part of the solutions to the multiplicity of stressors in African agriculture. It would be better if European stakeholders were to limit their opposition to GM organisms to Europe, rather than impose their preferences on poor and hungry Africans.

Comments
4 comments so far | RSS Comments RSS

Suggesting GMOs as an important part of the solution just cant be the sustainable solution…Suggesting this can be considered a treason to the human kind…

Posted by Sky Ay | Report as abusive
 

The fear of genetically modified crops is well founded.

But oil prices, overpopulation and climate change are all going to increase the prices of food. And soon, those who wish to eat in Africa will have little choice in what they eat. Assuming there is food for them to eat at all.

GM crops will provide a potential solution to an incoming starvation problem so large, it will make the previous years in Africa a pleasant memory. When the only practical alternative is starvation, GM crops will be accepted by the African population.

If the fears of GM crops are so important, they should be removed by further study.

Otherwise, these theoretical fears will eventually give way to real fears in Africa. The fears of mass wars, famines, diseases and death.

Posted by Anon | Report as abusive
 

What condescending, patronizing and generalized bowl dust. Alexander Solzhenitsyn, my favorite Russian dissident, again from memory, in his 1974 Nobel Prize (for Peace) speech allured that people will eventually be forced to migrate back to Africa. I don’t think he meant that they should arrive in modified form. Zimbabwe apparently has a strict policy on this. As Einstein said, ‘God doesn’t play dice with the Universe’. GM is like nuclear energy:- you fiddle with Nature, you end up with a mess. Let natural selection take its course.

Posted by Casper | Report as abusive
 

Europeans always mock Americans for idiot bureaucrats we elect and our unwavering religious beliefs, but Europeans stance against GMO’s shows me that it’s humankind that’s stupid.

Posted by Michael Ham | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
  •