Opinion

The Great Debate

There’s no way to hedge politics

January 26, 2010

Ben Bernanke in peril and the Volcker crackdown on proprietary trading by banks show two truths of the current dispensation: there is no effective hedge against politics and the reflation trade rests on fragile foundations.

Neither of these realities is particularly good for financial markets and neither is going away any time soon.

Both, too, are utterly related not just to each other, but to the Senate election in Massachusetts which installed a Republican into what had been a Kennedy seat, in the process terrifying Democrats who fear they will be sunk by association with a set of policies perceived to be favoring Wall Street.

In the aftermath, President Obama unveiled a policy authored by former Fed chief Paul Volcker, which is intended to make financial firms get out of the business of using government insurance to underwrite speculative bets; well, er, not all speculative bets, but the bad kind.

At the same time the confirmation of Bernanke is under threat, and he and the institution he works for had to endure the humiliation of seeing Senator Harry Reid issue a statement endorsing him but implying that he’d extracted some sort of undertaking from the central banker to “redouble” his efforts to help those struggling in the recovery.

Whether all of this is good or bad, or even if it has much of an impact, the fact is that both are the result of a financially struggling electorate which is going to strive to control things that they’ve previously been convinced to more or less let alone.

That’s quite a change from a few years ago, when most of us sat around stroking our chins and praising Alan Greenspan, banks and market forces as if they were one and the same. Everyone still agrees that you need banks, a market and a Federal Reserve Chairman, but there is a lot less agreement about how much freedom the three should be given.

This may be just a few politicians getting the vapors, and soon everyone may ignore finance and economics and get back to the Super Bowl and dancing competitions on television, but there is a real possibility that this popular upsurge has legs. Markets famously hate uncertainty, but this is worse: this is uncertainty mixed with hostility.

This does not have to play out one particular way, and this in some ways is the problem for investors. That stocks have been going their merry way higher in recent months while this issue lurked in the background is astounding. There is an extremely high level of uncertainly over how the world will work in coming years.

BRING ME THE HEAD OF, WELL, ANYONE

As for the Volcker Rule, if it works it is probably only fair, but you have to admit that it is also an arrow in the side of the whole reflation balloon which the administration has been pumping up since last year.

Wanting to avoid a Depression but being unwilling politically to take huge swaths of the banking system over temporarily, U.S. policy in essence underwrote the liabilities of the banking system without taking much of it over, leaving it to get on with arbitraging its new guarantee into profits with which to meet its losses and rebuild its capital.

That worked, if by worked you mean prevented big banks from falling over and revived asset markets.

But seeing as how shareholders are impotent, the bankers are continuing to take a huge, and often growing, share of the loot, a fact that is also politically untenable. Fixing that without undermining the recovery of banking and the reflation of markets is not going to be easy.

Bernanke’s plight, and the related effort to impose a new audit and other controls on the Federal Reserve are similarly both understandable and dangerous.

It’s not as if Bernanke and crew didn’t ask for it — first by standing as godfather to the bubble and latterly by buying up mortgages in what amounts to poaching on the Congressional prerogative of doling out money to specific sectors of the economy.

Even so two things stand out. A Fed chief who has been through a bruising political fight to retain office is an impaired Fed chief, both in terms of perceptions of independence and, potentially, real power and will to fight for that independence. Secondly, even if Bernanke was blameless, unemployment is high, former truths look pretty fragile and we can expect politicians to continue to meddle, or, if you like, to represent their electorates more actively.

It’s possible that Bernanke can play scapegoat, resign, and in going protect the Fed. It’s also possible that he is confirmed and stays with little long-term damage.

The underlying trend — call it populism or call it democracy — is not going away.

Comments
5 comments so far | RSS Comments RSS

Obama is now looking at the very real possibility of being a one-term president. Whether this would be fair or not is not the question (after all, George Bush, Jr. was given a second term and he could hardly be rated as anything more than poor/fair). Obama needs to show the American electorate that he’s not the worst of all possible worlds — just another manipulative, conniving politician and a disengaged academic who views all social and economic problems dispassionately. Cutting his ties with the failed policies of the past may require him to dump Bernanke. I think it would be politically advantageous if he did so. He owes Bernanke nothing. He was Bush’s man, after all. This might tell the American people what they want to hear: we are not wedded to the failed ideas of the last dozen years and we are not caught in the vortex of precipitous economic decline. We can’t go back to the way we’ve done things in the past. The clock is ticking on all of our lives. Obama must be proactive. If not, he’ll be known as the black man who couldn’t cut it. And that would be a tragedy on so many levels.

Posted by IntoTheTardis | Report as abusive
 

bernanke is just a symptom of the incoherence of a president that lost his way sometime ago in the ronald reagan theme park. but, bernanke should understand that he serves obama’s and the country’s best interest by resigning. however, people who live in the closed off power worlds that bernankies do, see themselves and what they’ve done as the things ‘great men’ do. they can never feel the outrage of the trampled masses they view from an indifferent distance. my guess is, bernanke will have to be pushed out. wonder if obama will understand why?

Posted by jborrow | Report as abusive
 

Bernanke will be confirmed with votes to spare. The financial institutions will keep the pressure on the republicans to save them from having to be accountable to the people and country.

The republicans will all they can to give the financial institutions all they want with a bonus. Just like the 5 so called supreme court judges gave the foreigners the rigth to be involed with as much money as they want in electoral system——I wonder how they got our of middle school much less college.

Posted by todnwth | Report as abusive
 

It’s incredibly disappointing that such a fragile economy has been further challenged by spiteful politics. Mr. Obama’s rhetoric will not help the middle-class of this country, as he so seeks. Set aside Wall Street; threatening the pursuit of profit (by limiting proprietary trading) in a Capitalist economic system will not help Main Street one bit. If the “Volcker Rule” passes whole, as Mr. Obama envisages, I would not be surprised to see credit contract further.

Mr. Obama is an actor and his movie is “Seeking a Second Term at All Costs.”

Posted by Holmes | Report as abusive
 

And now Obama is a movie star? He is in a movie–called “Stock Shock.” … exposing greedy hedge funds and market manipulation. Even though the movie mostly focuses on Sirius XM stock being naked short sold to hell, I liked it because it shows the dark side of Wall Street. DVD is everywhere for sale or rent but cheaper at http://www.stockshockmovie.com

Posted by MattFan | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
  •