Opinion

The Great Debate

America just declared the recovery over so you’d better get ready for the double dip

By John Carney
February 23, 2010

This article originally appeared in the Business Insider.

By John Carney

Today’s bleak consumer confidence number is undoubtedly bad news for the economy. The bigger than expected drop suggests that consumers have lost confidence in the recovery, which will drive down home prices and consumer spending.

Consumer confidence is typically our “first look” at the state of the economy. While most government aggregated data come out with a two-month lag, or more, consumer confidence hits with just a one month lag. Studies have shown that consumer confidence is a good predictor of consumer spending numbers. Basically, people surveyed seem to be good at accurately reading their own economic situation, and those surveyed accurately reflect the broader economy. When consumer confidence drops to such deep unexpected levels–today’s were the worst in 27 years–then it is a flashing red-light about the economy.

There wasn’t anything good about today’s numbers. Every part of the survey was awful. On jobs, the optimistic folks who say jobs are plentiful fell to 3.6 percent from 4.4 percent. The pessimistic people who said jobs are hard to get increased to 47.7 percent from 46.5 percent. The gauge of expectations for the next six-months fell to 63.8, from 77.3 the prior month. The share of people who believe their incomes will increase over the next six months fell to 9.5 from 11 percent. The share of those expecting more jobs fell to 12.4 percent from 15.8 percent.

The message: the economy sucks.

The recovery we were supposed to have.

You’ll read a lot about how the consumer confidence numbers are a lagging indicator. Indeed, they are a lagging indicator when measured against the stock market. The real time data conveyed by the stock market is often a better indicator than any survey or government data. But that doesn’t mean you shouldn’t pay attention to the consumer confidence number, especially since stocks have declined for most of this year.

Lets be clear here. The story-book recovery was dependent on a recovery of the consumer and a decline in the saving rate. If consumers lost some of their apprehension about future income prospects and future employment, they might begin to spend more on both retail goods and to purchase homes again. Anticipating this return of the consumer, businesses would increase capital spending and inventory.

We got half of that equation. Business spending on new equipment and software reversed course from the sharp drop recorded during the recession. Exports began to grow, as well. The inventory swing–from liquidation of early 2009 to inventory accumulation at the end of the year–automatically boosted GDP.

The idea was that this would create positive feedback loop, with more production necessitating the hiring of new workers, adding to household income. Consumers would respond to increased household income with higher spending. That’s pretty much the textbook end of a recession.

The expectation that we would have a textbook end to the recession informed many of the expectations that were blown away by today’s drop in consumer confidence. We’ve have a historical record of 31 previous recessions in the United States, most of which indicate that the end of the inventory cycle boosts production and therefore employment and incomes. More importantly, the workers who kept their jobs become more confident about their future job and income prospects and begin to spend a larger fraction of their incomes. Deferred spending during a recession usually creates pent-up demand by consumers and businesses that then boosts spending once the recession ends.

The recovery we actually got.

But this cycle seems to be different. Workers who have kept their jobs are not gaining confidence. Boosted production seems to be being built on the backs of the current workers, driving up worker productivity, instead of increasing incomes or employment. The apprehension about future income prospects and employment is growing, not diminishing.

This could have some dire consequences. The inventory build was premised on the idea of the recovering consumer. Since that premise is wrong, businesses will find they have made a mistake. Inventory will have to be discounted and or scrapped. New equipment will remain under-utilized, and some of the new hires will have to be let go. In other words, the half of the recovery equation we got will simply have to be liquidated or put in cold-storage because of the half we didn’t get.

How did we screw up the recovery? Why did businesses get this so wrong that we’re headed back for the double dip instead of slowly climbing out of the recession?

What went wrong?

The answer will sound familiar to anyone acquainted with the work of Ludwig Von Mises or Friedrich Hayek. Cheap money created an illusion of wealth that businessmen interpreted as pent up demand. They invest money in inventory and equipment on the assumption that the consumer would recovery. And there assumption was based on very good evidence from past recoveries and the notion that loose monetary policy inevitably spurs a recovery.

Why was it different this time? The problem this time is that we’re in what the Keynesians would call a “liquidity trap.” Consumers, having been savaged by the housing bubble and its consequences, continue to be fearful of the future. Government regulation is making consumer spending more difficult by increasing capitalization requirement for banks and squeezing consumer access to credit. Huge debt overhangs from the boom still have many people trying to pay down debts instead of engaging in new spending. To put it briefly, the supply of funds to fuel economic growth is still very low because cautious Americans do not have faith in the recovery.

Economic planners will describe the situation as an “excess liquidity preference” and recommend more government spending to push the economy toward higher employment. Unfortunately, unless we’re really lucky, much of this government spending will likely be long-term destructive because it will direct funds in the wrong directions because it isn’t subject to market discipline. In any case, the current political atmosphere seems particularly unwelcoming to additional deficit spending. So we’d better hunker down and get ourselves adjusted to an economy with a higher than historical liquidity preference.

Comments
9 comments so far | RSS Comments RSS

We expect too much from Washington, and it is akin to expecting our kids to win every time they play a game. I do think that most Senators and Congressmen might want to get their resumes updated for looking for a new job and most party leaders might want to resign before they get kicked out. Mr Obama might make it to the end of his first term if he walks the straight and narrow way.

Posted by fred5407 | Report as abusive
 

Nice article. Isn’t another name for “liquidity preference” called “increasing savings” or “building equity”? It’s about time that Americans started moving away from a debt driven consumption model to a more balanced, sustainable and prudent savings-investment model. Otherwise, China will be calling the shots for decades to come.

Posted by pluto123 | Report as abusive
 

The Only People “laughing all the way to the Bank” are the bankers themselves, think of the interest all the taxpayers Bailout Billions netted them $$$…. think of the Interest rates they pay now ( NOT) and think the Interest rates they are Charging YOU on your credit cards…No No this isn’t “Business as Usual” the consumer has been officially “Flipped off ” ( as in Finger) by the Banks, investment cos, wall street and anybody else who gambles with taxpayers investment Money. We have all been Hoodwinked by CDO’s and now the Dog is chasing his own Tail… the end will come when credit cards are declared useless pieces of worthless plastic and our currency is re-set to it’s true valuation.

Posted by Pangaea7 | Report as abusive
 

Don’t articles like this just exacerbate the problem? I read this and say, “better hold off on buying that new computer.” Hence it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.

Posted by Fishrl | Report as abusive
 

Not to worry. There’s lots of green shoots out there. Wink, wink, nod, nod.

Let’s face it, Washington and Wall Street investment analysts have lost what little credibility they had. Nothing has changed since the collapse of the economy except the reflation with funny money. This house of cards is beginning to topple. Deep structural problems with our economic and political systems haven’t gone away, they have just been lurking under the fed’s loose monetary policies.

Who’s going to believe there are green shoots now?

Posted by garrisongold | Report as abusive
 

I have been searching for a website like this in the field I am interested in. I am a big fan. I was thinking about creating my own blog about similar ideas for like-minded people. Some good ideas here. Thanks, I can only hope mine turns out as good as this one
American finance solution

Posted by MsCamellia2010 | Report as abusive
 

When you squeeze all the money out of the frontline, there’s no point in even pretending that a) there are consumers with much disposable income left; and b) that it’s ever going to get any better with the same people in charge.

Therefore, any pundits who bragged about a supposed upswing in the past few months were, quite simply, lying through their teeth. All that remains is for this to become a matter of record.

Posted by HBC | Report as abusive
 

Another economist, E.F. Schumacher, predicted the stages of a capitalist democracy that promotes the pursuit of giantism, it results in an oligarchy that dictates policy while forgetting the lessons of Henry Ford and others that understood that to a have a great place where smart guys can get rich you need to have a lot of people that are middle class to create viable markets.

Banking deregulation has led to an unhealthy concentration of wealth in the hands of people that risk our assets through their misguided innovations like derivatives on assets that claim extreme risk management that has never been proven in practice.

Lets go back to engineers and manufactures innovating and bans giving away toasters for new savings accounts.

Posted by jstaf | Report as abusive
 

When businesses are ready to invest some capitol in the American worker you will see a turn around in the ecconomy. When the 401k’s are drawn down and spent you will see a downturn that devistates families and businesses alike. I’m in the unemployment boat and when my money is gone and there is no job for me I’m going to ask myself the question of the ages. “To be or not to be”.

Posted by libby51 | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
  •