Tightening underway, Fed a passenger

February 23, 2010

A tightening in financial conditions is under way but its principal architect won’t be the Federal Reserve.

Far from it, the Fed will be pinned down by powerful disinflationary, perhaps even deflationary, forces, making it very unlikely to be willing to raise interest rates any time soon.

Instead the tightening is coming from Asia, where China is fighting a local battle against rampant lending, and from investors all over the world, as one by one they realize that lending to governments isn’t always so risk-free.

These two forces will form a vise around still riskier assets like stocks, especially in the United States, as companies face weak conditions at home in combination with tightening from markets.

Riskier assets sold off last week after the Fed raised the discount rate it charges banks by 25 basis points, a move some argued was a sign that actual rate hikes could come sooner than expected.

This was a good example of getting the right result for the wrong reasons.

Core consumer prices, excluding food and energy, fell in January for the first time since 1982, driven by falling rents and car prices and cheaper clothing. Energy costs drove overall inflation higher, but those prices, which are set by global demand, do not pose the kind of sustained inflationary threat the Fed will meet with rate hikes.

Even allowing for the fact that policies which favor house buyers are driving down rents, distorting inflation data, a look at Wal-Mart’s results confirms that times are tough, pricing power is rare and the real threat continues to be deflationary in nature.

Wal-Mart, which sells more to consumers than anyone,  reported last week that same-store revenues fell last quarter by 1.6 percent, driven by deflation in electronics and groceries. Wal-Mart said the influence of the “paycheck cycle” was as strong as they have seen it.

True enough that many Wal-Mart shopper are living paycheck to paycheck, but don’t forget about the 16.5 percent of the workforce which does not get a paycheck as they cannot find work or have given up seeking it.

Worse still, Wal-Mart said conditions now are more challenging still.

Clearly this is no recipe for inflation or rate hikes. It’s also not very good for corporate profits, unless of course you can borrow short from the government and lend long right back to it.

IT’S A BIG WORLD AND IT’S GETTING TIGHTER

So, the Fed won’t tighten and U.S. corporations will face difficult pricing conditions until downward pressure from unemployment eases.

Meanwhile in China, officials have been tightening conditions since early in the year and are quite likely to carry on. China’s central bank has ordered banks to set aside more reserves and is cracking down on loans that may be used for speculation. As China is one of the principal marginal drivers of demand for everything from cement to chicken feed this will have a cooling effect far beyond its borders, one far more powerful than the negligible impact of making the discount window a less friendly place for U.S. banks.

Morgan Stanley equity strategist Graham Secker argues that concerns about the ability of countries to service their debt is driving up the premium investors demand to hold so-called “risk-free” government paper. Greece is a prime example of this but the real risk is not so much in Greece as in what Greece stands for — the failure of confidence in sovereigns.

Further, there is the threat that debt financing crowds out private market borrowing, a phenomenon I’d argue we are already seeing as banks choose to hold government debt rather than make business or consumer loans. Crowding out happens when government borrowing commands so much capital that private enterprise must pay more to borrow.

“Outside the government and financial sectors, the demand for credit is likely to remain low, we think, as households look to de-lever. Nevertheless, with credit availability likely to remain subdued, a rise in the ‘risk-free’ rate implies a higher cost of capital for all,” Secker of Morgan Stanley wrote in a note to clients.

So what happens then when you combine a higher cost of capital with weak employment and widespread falling prices?

The rest of 2010 will provide the answer, but I am willing to venture a guess that it will not be higher official U.S. interest rates, though market rates for many borrowers may be another story.

Nor, for that matter, will it be higher equity prices in most of the important markets.

This feels very much like 2008 when the best people to lend to or invest in were the ones who needed it least.

3 comments

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/

Not one of your better one’s James.

“disinflationary, perhaps even deflationary’ – phew, larger quantum leaps than your jumps between the USofWalmart, China and Greece. What about the other 187 odd economies ?

Rate hikes are not black and white, it is shades of grey.

Posted by Ghandiolfini | Report as abusive

Sovereign debt risk, corporate borrowers crowded out – I was hearing all this guff back in 1982 from the same types as Mr Saft. I doubt Mr. Saft was around, or aware, back then so, like so many of his youthful peers, he believes that this time around is the first time these things have ever happened and he’s gonna write about them! And scare everybody too! Back off, son, and get a few more decades behind you before you presume to write everything off. JMHO

Posted by Gotthardbahn | Report as abusive

Sovereign risk? What sovereign risk? Is there still a country called Greece? I thought they have all melt together into one country called EuroZone. Unlike US or UK, Greece cannot even print its own money. At least the Chinese can print more money if they wanted. But why would they? They still have US$2Trillion of foreign currency reserve. Where is the sovereign risk? I do not get it.

Posted by LeeSiuHoi | Report as abusive