Goodbye America, Hello China? Think again

By Bernd Debusmann
March 12, 2010

For the growing number of Americans who see China heading for inevitable global dominance, nudging aside the United States, a brief walk down memory lane helps put long-term predictions into perspective.

Not so long ago, Japan was seen as the next (economic) number 1. American executives studied the 14 management principles of The Toyota Way, developed by the automobile manufacturer that grew into the world’s biggest car maker and is now recalling millions of defective vehicles.

Between the mid-1980s and early 1990s, books with titles such as Trading Places – How We Are Giving Our Future to Japan and How to Reclaim It (by Clyde Prestowitz) were required reading in Washington. Learned panelists expounded on the wondrous efficiency of “Japan Inc.”

A glut of “Amazing Japan” books, Chicago Tribune writer Ronald Yates noted in 1987, hammered home the same theme: Japanese technology is superior, Japanese management is better, Japanese products are unrivaled, Japanese people work harder, Japanese are smarter, Japan is No. 1.

Skip over the two decades of economic stagnation of Japan Inc. that soon followed the hype and fast forward to the present. The book which best reflects today’s American worries is entitled When China Rules the World: the End of the Western World and the Birth of the New Global Order, by British author Martin Jacques. His forecast is part of a growing library of essays, analyses and books on the 21st century belonging to China.

If history is any guide, there’s a better than even chance that the “goodbye America, hello China” school of thought will prove as embarrassingly wrong as the 1980s assessment of the relative strengths of Japan and the United States.

Long-term predictions tend to be more often wrong than right and the decline of the U.S. is a topic of seasonal regularity.

In February, a poll by the Washington Post and ABC, asked whether the 21st century would be more American or more Chinese. In terms of overall influence on world affairs, 43 percent opted for Chinese and 38 percent for American. In a Pew poll a few months earlier, 44 percent saw China as the world’s leading economic power and just 27 percent named the United States.

That was a remarkable reversal of opinion from early 2008, when 41 percent told Pew pollsters they thought the U.S. was the world’s top economic power and 30 percent named China. That shift probably says more about the sour mood of Americans very slowly emerging from a painful recession than about facts.
LONG WAY TO CATCH UP
China the world’s leading economic power? Its economy is less than a third of that of the U.S. Its GDP per head is one fourteenth of the U.S., roughly half that of Kazakhstan, according to the World Bank. About a quarter of the world’s economic output is produced by the United States, whose population is less than a fourth of China’s 1.3 billion.

So there’s a very long way to catch up for a country beset by a variety of Third World problems, from lack of paved roads in many rural areas to water pollution so severe that 700 million people have to drink contaminated water every day, according to the World Bank.

China enthusiasts made much of statistics early in the year that the country had overtaken Germany as the world’s largest exporter in 2009. Along with many of the figures cited to show China’s relentless long march to superpowerdom, it gives an incomplete picture.

A large proportion of those exports, three quarters by some accounts, are products assembled for international companies from imported components, not the fruit of brilliant Chinese innovation. Similar to the maquiladora assembly plants on the Mexican side of the U.S.-Mexico border, such factories provide jobs but don’t do much for the economic well-being of the average citizen.

And the fast economic growth of the past (eight percent plus, year after year) that has so impressed many American analysts is bound to run into a giant obstacle for which there is no solution in sight. Nicholas Eberstadt, a Harvard demographer, has long warned that China is facing a surge of citizens aged over 60 for which the Communist-run system is not prepared. By 2050, according to estimates by the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), China will have more than 438 million people over 60 and 100 million over 80.

It is an unusual phenomenon, a country growing old before it grows rich, and it has consequences that go beyond retirement policy. China’s rapid ageing, a consequence of the government’s one-child policy, “threatens to impose a rising burden on the young, slow economic and living standard growth and become a socially destabilizing force,” said a CSIS report last year.

Without a solution to that problem, “it is difficult to envision a prosperous, long-term future for China.”

So, here’s a word of advice for Americans fretting about their country’s standing in relation to China: Relax!

56 comments

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/

The diversity of the comments on here should hint at both America’s strength and its weakness. What we have here, this free discussion of innumerable, uncensored opinions, is not the Chinese way. Still, this feeds our argumentative nature, for we do NOT agree. This both empowers us through innovation, creativity and drive, yes weakens our cooperation and the expediency with which our will is carried out. Which the People’s Republic Of China makes a decision, its will is acted out -in America, it’s run through red tape until everyone has had their chance to smear their shite and opinion on it.

“China” as we call it, does not invest in the potential of its people, and thus will never match the dominance of the United States -the bickering children that we are.

Posted by jcettison | Report as abusive

China’s economy is way behind the US. Americans have nothing to worry about China catching up with US. Americans should pay more attention to re-balancing their balance sheets. Don’t pray or wish for Asian economies to decline. That is not the right thing to do.

Posted by gmcs | Report as abusive

Mr. Debusmann is saying that America don’t worry China will screw up and fail like Japan. He gets paid for writing this dribble?

Posted by Truthnow | Report as abusive

China become world leader??
개어이상실 ㅡ.ㅡ
Hey,, the usa!!!
Have confidence~~
Although,,china can become the strongest country,,
china can’t become world leader..
Real world leader is not just strong country..u know..

Posted by ssibalnom | Report as abusive

To everyone,

Everything about Chinese economics is just what you make of it. It’s much more of a belief system. Any piece of data you find in a paper or of the web is nothing more than what some party secretary decided. For instance when the price of gas was 140$ a barrel, it was still being sold here for 60 cents per liter, but somehow China mobile and Sinopec both made huge profits while buying gas overseas and selling it at home for cheap.

Another issue worth pointing out is housing. With Shanghai selling per square meter nearly double that of Manhattan while standing at 51% occupancy there remains no fear here of a housing bubble. I’ve seen skyscrapers being constructed way out in the countryside. In every city in China there is a massive surplus of apartments.

Employment is also a major problem. With so many people employed in building infrastructure and housing, it’s only a matter of time until they will no longer be needed on such a large scale. When the bubble pops it will be trigger a global depression

Posted by kc10man | Report as abusive

To everyone,

Everything about Chinese economics is just what you make of it. It’s much more of a belief system. Any piece of data you find in a paper or of the web is nothing more than what some party secretary decided. For instance when the price of gas was 140$ a barrel, it was still being sold here for 60 cents per liter, but somehow China mobile and Sinopec both made huge profits while buying gas overseas and selling it at home for cheap.

Another issue worth pointing out is housing. With Shanghai selling per square meter nearly double that of Manhattan while standing at 51% occupancy there remains no fear here of a housing bubble. I’ve seen skyscrapers being constructed way out in the countryside. In every city in China there is a massive surplus of apartments.

Employment is also a major problem. With so many people imployed in building infrastructure and housing, it’s only a matter of time until they will no longer be needed on such a large scale. When the bubble pops it will be trigger a global depression

Posted by kc10man | Report as abusive

Bernd: “About a quarter of the world’s economic output is produced by the United States, whose population is less than a fourth of China’s 1.3 billion.” – what exactly does the US export and how come it has this huge budget and trade deficit ? What does that say of its relative energy consumption ?

Voice of Reason says nothing, another crude media implant (CMI)? Kalada and An0nym0us says it all.

I doubt that the Chinese BubbleFreeMasons are meek and mild.

A ‘No 1′ society is driven by its coherent and binding culture and/or a strong and well managed autocracy. China has both, the US has neither, that is why bipartisanship had to become a (pirated) decree.

Posted by Ghandiolfini | Report as abusive

China’s ascendancy is guaranteed: it has a huge population and impressive economic growth. However, this does not translate into geopolitical dominance quite so easily. China’s per capita GDP is sure to be extremely low for the foreseeable future, its military is powerful when compared to Vietnam, but child’s play when it comes to the US military. All in all, we should get used to a powerful China…but let’s not make it more than it is. For more see: http://www.philosoguy.com/13/dont-be-afr aid-of-china/

Posted by pcasinelli | Report as abusive

pcasinelli: so these are the yardsticks and drivers of the global citizen ? No wonder things are not working out.

No military intervention is child’s play, it is NATO, not the US.

Maybe if we start focussing on value systems like the ‘most attractive country to live in’ or the ‘least corrupt’, that there will be a much needed paradigm mindshift.

Posted by Ghandiolfini | Report as abusive

America’s strength is its entrepreneurial spirit and freedom/capital is inevitable for its growth. Japanese strength is its community spirit, production is well suited to its culture and individual’s freedom is not a must to it. China’s strength is the will power of its man/woman and they are good at a spectrum of human activities. Pressure is just fuel for this will power. China is not a threat to any culture and its ability to absorb from other cultures while not losing its own is remarkable. I witnessed the productivity of average Chinese man and know it is above the average of world. But this is not true for less pressured Chinese origin people in free areas of the world. Cornering China would be foolish.
China is standing in the world with its pride. Question of whether it is 1 or 2 or 3 or 4 is just for entertainment.
Can we stand as equals? That is the bigger question.

Posted by PragashNair | Report as abusive

Bertrand Russell put things quaintly in “The Problem of China” –
http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/13940

But nothing on earth – not even Bertrand Russell – can stop fearful people from fearing people from other cultures, no matter how much they could be learning from their encounters. And America has fearful people to burn, as these polls consistently show.

Empire down.

Posted by HBC | Report as abusive

kc10man states”Shanghai selling per square meter nearly double that of Manhattan”. Can I ask where the statistics are from? Looks like there might be some miscalculation with the floor area basis or the exchange rate. Comments welcome.

Posted by doctorjay317 | Report as abusive

This is off-base on a couple of levels. First of all, say what you want about Japan’s economy, but they’re still killing the U.S. in trade, with a trade surplus in manufactured goods with the U.S. that, in per capita terms, dwarfs that of China. If China ever even comes close to Japan, it’ll spell doom for America’s economy.

Secondly, Japan spurns nuclear weapons and is a basically pacifist nation. China, on the other hand, has nuclear weapons and big military ambitions.

Posted by Pete_Murphy | Report as abusive

It is America and its governments who have helped China rise to glory and unprecedented power? Why all this amazement? Don’t US and British voters know that multinationals have been running their fates, now that the markets in the West have nothing more to give, hey presto time to cream the East (Japan exluded, that’s been spent), I ve been to Japan by the way, China will look as bad as that once the greed crazies are finished with it, and all the money and taste will stay in the Switzerlands and Sweden’s of this world… the Chinese have not woken up to the unsustainability of their model, their collapse is about 10 years away.

Posted by myotherme | Report as abusive

Relax? I’m not sure how the “defence” budget of the USA can be sold to a “relaxed” constituency, surely that won’t happen.
I find your comparison of China with Japan simply implausible. China’s future strength and long term growth prospects will be possible because of its huge domestic market, exports will rapidly diminish in importance and as a percentage of its overall economy, something the west actively seeks. The other obvious difference is China is able to defend itself, unlike Japan, from intimidation by anyone, though I see no reason for that to be misconstrued as “military ambition” I thought that was called a defence capability or is that just for nominated countries
As for China’s future developement, I suggest you check the ethnic breakdown of students in the top universities of the USA and Europe, you may be surprised. They can do more than plant rice and fix together the components of western technology, but I agree there’s no need to get your knickers in a twist about it. Suddenly I have the urge to read the Monroe Doctrine, not sure why.

Posted by Wittau | Report as abusive

The comparison with Japan is a tired old chestnut. Japan has less than half the population of the U.S. while China has more than four times the population of the U.S. China has serious problems, but so has America. America can remain the leading nation, but only by working hard and smart, so your advice to “relax” is absurd. Anyway, my money is on India to be the leading nation in a hundred years time.

Posted by Osomec | Report as abusive