America needs sensible, bipartisan financial reform now

April 22, 2010

— By Rob Nichols is president & COO of the Financial Services Forum. The views expressed are his own. —

Reform of our financial supervisory framework is a top priority for the members of the Financial Services Forum, and should be for our nation. In addition to protecting investors, consumers, and shareholders, bipartisan financial regulatory reform will bring much needed certainty to our capital and credit markets and help to fuel our economy and create jobs.

To maintain a position of financial and economic leadership, the United States needs a 21st century framework of financial supervision that protects the interests of depositors, investors, and consumers, and policy holders; ensures the safety and soundness of financial institutions; ensures financial system stability; and ensures an effective and competitive financial marketplace to fuel economic growth and job creation.  Stated another way, financial reform must minimize the chances of another fire, while providing the means for effectively fighting another crisis should it occur.

Toward that end, the Financial Services Forum considers the following reforms essential:

•    End “Too-Big-to-Fail”: The shareholders and management of financial institutions – regardless of size – should never again be insulated from the consequences of their own mistakes. The discipline of potential failure is necessary to ensure truly fair and competitive markets. Accordingly, Congress should provide the relevant agencies with the legal authority, procedural protocol, required resources, and expertise for resolving even the largest, most interconnected, and complex entities in a manner that preserves public confidence, protects systemic stability, and provides reasonable certainty to customers, shareholders, creditors, and other stakeholders.  More effective supervision coupled with resolution authority is the remedy to too-big-to-fail – not the preemptive dismantling of large, healthy, well-managed institutions.

•    Enhance Consumer Protection: The United States cannot be a world-class financial marketplace unless consumers have full confidence in the safety and soundness of financial institutions, the integrity of the markets, the quality and suitability of financial products, and the basic fairness of the broader financial system. Views differ on the best means of ensuring stronger consumer protections, but strong national standards – which would promote consistency of application and enforcement of consumer protection rules across all financial institutions – should be the principle that guides consumer protection efforts.

•    Regulate Over-the-Counter Derivatives: Derivatives are financial tools that enable corporations and other businesses to hedge the risks to which their businesses are exposed – thereby lowering the cost of capital and contributing to economic growth and job creation. Effective oversight of OTC derivatives markets is necessary to: 1) ensure those markets do not threaten the stability of the broader financial system; 2) promote market transparency and efficiency; 3) prevent market manipulation, fraud, and other abuses; and, 4) ensure that derivatives are not used or marketed inappropriately.

Toward this end, all standardized OTC derivatives – as determined by regulators, working closely with the industry – among dealers and major non-end user market participants should be cleared through regulated central counterparties, and all OTC derivatives dealers should be subject to a robust regime of prudential supervision, including appropriate margin and capital requirements, business conduct and transparency standards, and timely reporting requirements.

Establish “Systemic Supervision”: To ensure a more coherent, consistent, and comprehensive approach to financial supervision, some entity should be charged with monitoring, assessing, and addressing emerging risks that might threaten the stability of the financial system.  To avoid the confusion that stems from duplicative regulation, the systemic supervisor and relevant functional regulators should coordinate their activities.  Similarly, because systemic risk is a global concern, active coordination with foreign and international counterparts is critical to ensure cross-border supervisory consistency, and to ensure a level field of competition.

In order for our financial sector to best serve Main Street, it is critical that we determine the rules of the road. We appreciate the hard work of Senators on both sides of the aisle to address these complex issues, and respectfully urge members to reach a bipartisan agreement this year.


We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see

The problem is that the Republicans are too far to the right to compromise. They are the minority – they were voted out because they screwed things up so badly. Yet they want to have everything their own way – all or nothing – as if they were still the majority. They just do not realize that they do not represent the thinking of the American people.

Americans want reform. They want reasonable regulations – not a cowboy economy where anything goes until it all blows up again.

Posted by jmmx | Report as abusive

The reason Republicans and Democrats all just present drama without any change is that they *BOTH* were sold to the same moneyed interests by a very corrupt electoral system. They have the same masters. Those masters like things the way they are, thank you very much!

Get rid of Gerrymandered congressional districts, get rid of the “Two Party” system, get rid of legal bribery of elected officials by eliminating the tax free conversion of “Campaign Contributions” to personal use. That means you stick it in your pocket, free of tax, legally. That means it is a bribe anywhere else.

Get rid of the notion that high level employees get to set their own compensation. Let stockholders vote on anything they want, and get rid of “advisory” stockholder votes. Let the big boys get out of the country. It will be no loss to the other 99% of us, as long as we keep them and their lackies out.

Posted by txgadfly | Report as abusive

Actually it was Congressmen such as Barney Frank, Chuck Schumer, and Chris Dodd, who promoted banks’ high-risk lending to risky borrowers. Now Obama and his coterie want to set up a fund to bail out companies on the verge of collapse. If Obama had real management experience (including meeting a payroll), he would avoid this all-or-nothing approach. Now there are no incentives for corporations to produce because profits are marginalized.

Posted by Psychologist | Report as abusive

Actually, it was the Republicans who in 2002, decided that the world needed “free market, unregulated banking”. And they took off any regulation that would control madness. Remember, for six years leading up to this disaster, the Republicans controlled all three branches of government.

However, Frank, Schumer and Dodd, did nothing to stop this insanity. In fact, they did push hard and successfully for loans to people who were not quality loan candidates; both during the Clinton era and during the Bush era.

Both parties strive to work only for their respective extremes: right or left. America suffers badly because of this.

Posted by daphi | Report as abusive

[…] America needs sensible, bipartisan financial reform now | Analysis … […]

Posted by financial – Financial Independence – free article courtesy of | Report as abusive