<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In drug war, the beginning of the end?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2010/08/20/in-drug-war-the-beginning-of-the-end/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2010/08/20/in-drug-war-the-beginning-of-the-end/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 14:03:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: caliguy55</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2010/08/20/in-drug-war-the-beginning-of-the-end/comment-page-1/#comment-32029</link>
		<dc:creator>caliguy55</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 19:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=7842#comment-32029</guid>
		<description>CORRECTION

There can be no doubt that the war against drugs was lost long ago. That point came when the risk to society of making drugs illegal was outweighed by the benefits society would gain by making them legal. Certainly, the risk to society of making drugs illegal in terms of violence, supporting organized crime, costing billions to imprison users and dealers, making criminals out of many ordinary Americans, who did nothing but attempt to enjoy the freedom of using the substance of their choice in situations that presented no risk of harm to others, and the cost of lost productivity from Americans, who cannot find jobs they&#039;re very capable of doing because of a drug conviction is far outweighed by the benefits of legalization, i.e., the tax revenue to be gained by taxing the sales of drugs, the billions saved in freeing up most prison space that could then be used to imprison criminals who commit crimes against the person and/or property of others (these crimes cost Americans a huge sum of money and more with the loss of life, etc.), the production that could be gained from Americans, who lose control of their ability to use drugs reasonably, through rehabilitation and treatment, and regaining the freedom we&#039;ve always claimed to have but hypocritically take away (the legalization of alcohol and tobacco being a good example of this hypocrisy). For me, that should be the end of the discussion based on good, common sense. The conclusion - legalize all drugs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CORRECTION</p>
<p>There can be no doubt that the war against drugs was lost long ago. That point came when the risk to society of making drugs illegal was outweighed by the benefits society would gain by making them legal. Certainly, the risk to society of making drugs illegal in terms of violence, supporting organized crime, costing billions to imprison users and dealers, making criminals out of many ordinary Americans, who did nothing but attempt to enjoy the freedom of using the substance of their choice in situations that presented no risk of harm to others, and the cost of lost productivity from Americans, who cannot find jobs they&#8217;re very capable of doing because of a drug conviction is far outweighed by the benefits of legalization, i.e., the tax revenue to be gained by taxing the sales of drugs, the billions saved in freeing up most prison space that could then be used to imprison criminals who commit crimes against the person and/or property of others (these crimes cost Americans a huge sum of money and more with the loss of life, etc.), the production that could be gained from Americans, who lose control of their ability to use drugs reasonably, through rehabilitation and treatment, and regaining the freedom we&#8217;ve always claimed to have but hypocritically take away (the legalization of alcohol and tobacco being a good example of this hypocrisy). For me, that should be the end of the discussion based on good, common sense. The conclusion &#8211; legalize all drugs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: caliguy55</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2010/08/20/in-drug-war-the-beginning-of-the-end/comment-page-1/#comment-32028</link>
		<dc:creator>caliguy55</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 19:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=7842#comment-32028</guid>
		<description>There can be no doubt that the war against drugs was lost long ago. That point came when the risk to society of making drugs illegal was outweighed by the benefits society would gain by making them legal. Certainly, the risk to society of making drugs illegal in terms of violence, supporting organized crime, costing billions to imprison users and dealers, making criminals out of many ordinary Americans, who did nothing but attempt to enjoy the freedom of using the substance of their choice in situations that presented no risk of harm to others, and the cost of lost productivity from Americans, who cannot find jobs they&#039;re very capable of doing because of a drug conviction far outweighs the benefits of legalization, i.e., the tax revenue to be gained by taxing the sales of drugs, the billions saved in freeing up most prison space that could then be used to imprison criminals who commit crimes against the person and/or property of others (these crimes cost Americans a huge sum of money and more with the loss of life, etc.), the production that could be gained from Americans, who lose control of their ability to use drugs reasonably, through rehabilitation and treatment, and regaining the freedom we&#039;ve always claimed to have but hypocritically take away (the legalization of alcohol and tobacco being a good example of this hypocrisy). For me, that should be the end of the discussion based on good, common sense. The conclusion - legalize all drugs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There can be no doubt that the war against drugs was lost long ago. That point came when the risk to society of making drugs illegal was outweighed by the benefits society would gain by making them legal. Certainly, the risk to society of making drugs illegal in terms of violence, supporting organized crime, costing billions to imprison users and dealers, making criminals out of many ordinary Americans, who did nothing but attempt to enjoy the freedom of using the substance of their choice in situations that presented no risk of harm to others, and the cost of lost productivity from Americans, who cannot find jobs they&#8217;re very capable of doing because of a drug conviction far outweighs the benefits of legalization, i.e., the tax revenue to be gained by taxing the sales of drugs, the billions saved in freeing up most prison space that could then be used to imprison criminals who commit crimes against the person and/or property of others (these crimes cost Americans a huge sum of money and more with the loss of life, etc.), the production that could be gained from Americans, who lose control of their ability to use drugs reasonably, through rehabilitation and treatment, and regaining the freedom we&#8217;ve always claimed to have but hypocritically take away (the legalization of alcohol and tobacco being a good example of this hypocrisy). For me, that should be the end of the discussion based on good, common sense. The conclusion &#8211; legalize all drugs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 5tudentT</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2010/08/20/in-drug-war-the-beginning-of-the-end/comment-page-1/#comment-31842</link>
		<dc:creator>5tudentT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=7842#comment-31842</guid>
		<description>shameOnCorps

You could drink water for twenty four hours straight and that would kill you too.  Your argument... holds no water.

&quot;God made grass...&quot;  Your religious inclinations seem to have messed up your ability to reason.  Or maybe it&#039;s the grass.

Or maybe the smiley at the end means it&#039;s all tongue in cheek.  In that case, very amusing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>shameOnCorps</p>
<p>You could drink water for twenty four hours straight and that would kill you too.  Your argument&#8230; holds no water.</p>
<p>&#8220;God made grass&#8230;&#8221;  Your religious inclinations seem to have messed up your ability to reason.  Or maybe it&#8217;s the grass.</p>
<p>Or maybe the smiley at the end means it&#8217;s all tongue in cheek.  In that case, very amusing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JeffHBCA</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2010/08/20/in-drug-war-the-beginning-of-the-end/comment-page-1/#comment-31757</link>
		<dc:creator>JeffHBCA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 05:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=7842#comment-31757</guid>
		<description>Create legal channels for marijuana usage and you will end its role as a gateway drug to harder stuff. Plus, as a legal product it will undoubtedly be a leading job creation engine over the next 25 to 50 years. Best of all, we could airlift it into Gaza, North Korea, and other international hot spots and it would probably mellow everyone out and prevent a war or two. . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Create legal channels for marijuana usage and you will end its role as a gateway drug to harder stuff. Plus, as a legal product it will undoubtedly be a leading job creation engine over the next 25 to 50 years. Best of all, we could airlift it into Gaza, North Korea, and other international hot spots and it would probably mellow everyone out and prevent a war or two. . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drewbie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2010/08/20/in-drug-war-the-beginning-of-the-end/comment-page-1/#comment-31565</link>
		<dc:creator>drewbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 20:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=7842#comment-31565</guid>
		<description>&quot;You can make all the excuses you want for why you think this wouldn’t have a significant effect on the reduction of power by drug cartels and violent gangs, but the experts, the one’s who’s opinions matter, don’t agree with that logic.&quot; 

Posted by Cali099

What &#039;experts&#039; are you talking about?  What field of study qualifies such a position?  How do you know I don&#039;t have such a background, and that my opinion doesn&#039;t matter?

Besides, I never disagreed with your &#039;experts&#039;, except perhaps in timescale.  Legalization won&#039;t bring them down in a day, a year, or even a decade.  Due to the duration of the war, this isn&#039;t a job for them.  It&#039;s a lifestyle, handed down to them by their parents.  They don&#039;t need funding to hire &quot;hitmen.&quot;  They are hitmen.  

Right now they have money and guns.  Legalize, and they have guns, but no money.  I&#039;m sure they&#039;ll figure out ways to use what they&#039;ve got to get what they want.

Again, I agreed with the article and your &#039;experts&#039; - leagalization is the way to go.  But we need to be prepared for the side effects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You can make all the excuses you want for why you think this wouldn’t have a significant effect on the reduction of power by drug cartels and violent gangs, but the experts, the one’s who’s opinions matter, don’t agree with that logic.&#8221; </p>
<p>Posted by Cali099</p>
<p>What &#8216;experts&#8217; are you talking about?  What field of study qualifies such a position?  How do you know I don&#8217;t have such a background, and that my opinion doesn&#8217;t matter?</p>
<p>Besides, I never disagreed with your &#8216;experts&#8217;, except perhaps in timescale.  Legalization won&#8217;t bring them down in a day, a year, or even a decade.  Due to the duration of the war, this isn&#8217;t a job for them.  It&#8217;s a lifestyle, handed down to them by their parents.  They don&#8217;t need funding to hire &#8220;hitmen.&#8221;  They are hitmen.  </p>
<p>Right now they have money and guns.  Legalize, and they have guns, but no money.  I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;ll figure out ways to use what they&#8217;ve got to get what they want.</p>
<p>Again, I agreed with the article and your &#8216;experts&#8217; &#8211; leagalization is the way to go.  But we need to be prepared for the side effects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PAIN</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2010/08/20/in-drug-war-the-beginning-of-the-end/comment-page-1/#comment-31555</link>
		<dc:creator>PAIN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 14:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=7842#comment-31555</guid>
		<description>The United States of America has a great deal of catching up to do when it comes to allowing Doctors, specifically Specialists in the treatment of Pain, to freely prescribe the medications that contemporary science and medicine agree, no, insist WILL help eliminate/control/manage pain for patients who present with illnesses that will respond in the positive to their use.

 The government must stop wantonly and without any nefarious information, the going into practitioners files, under the guise of &quot;protecting people from unscrupulous misuse&quot;
and deciding if a patient is &#039;overmedicated&#039; according to them, and changing or eliminating medications from patients by using the power they have over that practitioners license to prescribe the &quot;narcotics&quot; in question. 

For this reason, and this reason specifically, I believe this silly &#039;War on Drugs&#039; must STOP!!! It has gone from attempts to stop drugs from being used illegally, to smuggling in of drugs to this &quot;innocent bucolic&quot; country, to now the easiest target, the need for medical use of these drugs. We have allowed a monster to be born and supported by us. Eliminate it, before damage done is irreversible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The United States of America has a great deal of catching up to do when it comes to allowing Doctors, specifically Specialists in the treatment of Pain, to freely prescribe the medications that contemporary science and medicine agree, no, insist WILL help eliminate/control/manage pain for patients who present with illnesses that will respond in the positive to their use.</p>
<p> The government must stop wantonly and without any nefarious information, the going into practitioners files, under the guise of &#8220;protecting people from unscrupulous misuse&#8221;<br />
and deciding if a patient is &#8216;overmedicated&#8217; according to them, and changing or eliminating medications from patients by using the power they have over that practitioners license to prescribe the &#8220;narcotics&#8221; in question. </p>
<p>For this reason, and this reason specifically, I believe this silly &#8216;War on Drugs&#8217; must STOP!!! It has gone from attempts to stop drugs from being used illegally, to smuggling in of drugs to this &#8220;innocent bucolic&#8221; country, to now the easiest target, the need for medical use of these drugs. We have allowed a monster to be born and supported by us. Eliminate it, before damage done is irreversible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: picomanning</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2010/08/20/in-drug-war-the-beginning-of-the-end/comment-page-1/#comment-31546</link>
		<dc:creator>picomanning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 05:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=7842#comment-31546</guid>
		<description>Arresting criminals was never the problem. Locking them up in high class kennels was always the problem. I can design a workable work-out prison in a few hours. Teach, rehabilitate, have prisoners produce. If they don&#039;t want to, then nothing personal, keep them in the kennel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arresting criminals was never the problem. Locking them up in high class kennels was always the problem. I can design a workable work-out prison in a few hours. Teach, rehabilitate, have prisoners produce. If they don&#8217;t want to, then nothing personal, keep them in the kennel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crimsondrac</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2010/08/20/in-drug-war-the-beginning-of-the-end/comment-page-1/#comment-31534</link>
		<dc:creator>crimsondrac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 20:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=7842#comment-31534</guid>
		<description>The drug cartels are not going to vanish overnight, but perhaps they can take the same avenue as the bootleggers of the US Prohibition.  After prohibition was repealed, many of the bootleggers went legitimate.  Some went into racing, others went on to start their own multi-million dollar liquor companies.  Though, they should be held accountable for the violence and death they have caused.  I am sure there was gun fire and violence during alcohol prohibition, but no where on the scale of what is going on today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The drug cartels are not going to vanish overnight, but perhaps they can take the same avenue as the bootleggers of the US Prohibition.  After prohibition was repealed, many of the bootleggers went legitimate.  Some went into racing, others went on to start their own multi-million dollar liquor companies.  Though, they should be held accountable for the violence and death they have caused.  I am sure there was gun fire and violence during alcohol prohibition, but no where on the scale of what is going on today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shameOnCorps</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2010/08/20/in-drug-war-the-beginning-of-the-end/comment-page-1/#comment-31532</link>
		<dc:creator>shameOnCorps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 17:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=7842#comment-31532</guid>
		<description>@5tudenT
It is less debilitating/risky in the respect that you can smoke/eat marijuana for twenty four hours a day non-stop without dropping dead. Try that with beer, wine, or straight liquor and see what happens. The very worst thing that could happen from ingesting marijuana is you could feel paranoid or anxious. On the other hand, marijuana can relieve those same problems for someone with mental health issues. It affects people in different ways, we are all unique. If you over consume cannabis the second worst thing that could happen is you fall asleep. The third worst thing that could happen with marijuana is that you attack a bag of chips or a chocolate cake with utter abandonment and perhaps complete conviction that you will not be eating during the next week.
People die directly because of alcohol everyday. Whether it be from operating machinery when intoxicated, a run in with someone who is DUI, or from alcohol poisoning. Not to mention from the alcohol fueled violent rages that some people experience. Yet I have never found an instance where a person died from marijauna consumption alone. I say marijuana consumption alone because there are many people that smoke marijuana with tobbaco, which we all know is deadly and leads to lung cancer. I am an older drinker and a toker. I do not speak rhetorically about this issue, I speak from experience. I have seen friends wind up in the hospital from booze and even from sugar, or lack thereof. Never cannabis. 
God made grass, man made beer. Who do you trust? ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@5tudenT<br />
It is less debilitating/risky in the respect that you can smoke/eat marijuana for twenty four hours a day non-stop without dropping dead. Try that with beer, wine, or straight liquor and see what happens. The very worst thing that could happen from ingesting marijuana is you could feel paranoid or anxious. On the other hand, marijuana can relieve those same problems for someone with mental health issues. It affects people in different ways, we are all unique. If you over consume cannabis the second worst thing that could happen is you fall asleep. The third worst thing that could happen with marijuana is that you attack a bag of chips or a chocolate cake with utter abandonment and perhaps complete conviction that you will not be eating during the next week.<br />
People die directly because of alcohol everyday. Whether it be from operating machinery when intoxicated, a run in with someone who is DUI, or from alcohol poisoning. Not to mention from the alcohol fueled violent rages that some people experience. Yet I have never found an instance where a person died from marijauna consumption alone. I say marijuana consumption alone because there are many people that smoke marijuana with tobbaco, which we all know is deadly and leads to lung cancer. I am an older drinker and a toker. I do not speak rhetorically about this issue, I speak from experience. I have seen friends wind up in the hospital from booze and even from sugar, or lack thereof. Never cannabis.<br />
God made grass, man made beer. Who do you trust? <img src='http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 5tudentT</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2010/08/20/in-drug-war-the-beginning-of-the-end/comment-page-1/#comment-31531</link>
		<dc:creator>5tudentT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 15:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=7842#comment-31531</guid>
		<description>&quot;...marajuana is far less debilitating and poses far less health risk compared to alcohol.&quot;

In what respect is it less debilitating/risky? And based on what consumption levels?

I&#039;m for legalization, but statements like this are are not helpful or informative.  They&#039;re simply part of the rhetorical s**t storm that surrounds any hot political issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;marajuana is far less debilitating and poses far less health risk compared to alcohol.&#8221;</p>
<p>In what respect is it less debilitating/risky? And based on what consumption levels?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m for legalization, but statements like this are are not helpful or informative.  They&#8217;re simply part of the rhetorical s**t storm that surrounds any hot political issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
