Opinion

The Great Debate

Is your boss a ‘bosshole’?

By Peter Sims
September 2, 2010

The following is a guest post by Peter Sims, a former venture capitalist and co-author of “True North: Discover Your Authentic Leadership.” His next book, “Little Bets,” will be published next spring.

It has been damn near impossible to find consistently good and objective insight and analysis from business thought leaders. But Robert I. Sutton, a professor of Management Science and Engineering at Stanford and the Stanford Institute of Design (where we have overlapped), is an exception.

His new book, out now, is his best to date. Good Boss, Bad Boss is food for thought for managers and leaders in organizations large and small. It is packed with insight, lists of “how to” suggestions, and questions for bosses to ask themselves.

Sutton weaves many of these nuggets together with interesting stories in Good Boss, Bad Boss — while building on his last book, The No Asshole Rule, a New York Times best seller.

Sutton draws upon an impressively broad collection of research, including fascinating sociology research from Rob Cross that shows top performing employees are far more likely to have high energy than high IQs. He also gives some space to Frank Flynn’s research about what kind of boss is most effective — competitive, aggressive, passive, or submissive. “Moderately assertive” bosses win. Those bosses are able to strike a balance between managing too much and too little, something Sutton calls “Lasorda’s Law,” after the former Los Angeles Dodgers manager Tommy Lasorda’s style.

Most of the book is organized around insights like these, including INSEAD’s Morton Hansen whose research shows the problems with “solo star” organizational cultures and Amy Edmondson’s research about the importance of psychological safety in order to increase decision-making and creative confidence.

Sutton also quotes from Karl Weick, the legendary psychology professor at University of Michigan’s business school, who taught Sutton: “fight as if you are right, and listen as if you are wrong.”

Sutton laces the observations together with illustrative anecdotes about good bosses like 3M’s William Coyne, Pixar’s Ed Catmull, IDEO’s David Kelley, and Lenny Mendonca of McKinsey & Company – and bad bosses, such as the temperamental Joe Cassano of AIG, whose division lost an estimated $45 billion.

He also shares the best organizational insights and observations he has accumulated over the years such as at Avis, General Motors (a company and culture Sutton has followed closely and astutely), and The Onion. General Motors managers, for example, were distanced from the needs of their customers for years because they got free GM cars, without haggling at dealerships. Meanwhile, writers at The Onion throw out 600 headlines ideas for every 18 that get published — a testament to the importance of creating failure-tolerant cultures.

At times, though, so many insights make the book feel a bit like a cookbook and wind up getting lost in the shuffle.  Sutton’s a good writer, although be prepared to dog-ear and underline your copy to revisit the themes that resonate the most.

The best chapter, though, does just the opposite. Chapter 8: “Squelch Your Inner Bosshole” presents Sutton’s unique contribution to the mountains of leadership and management literature – while illustrating the corrosive long-term effects that toxic and bullying bosses (i.e. assholes) have on organizations, Sutton presents a compelling case for the need for good bosses. In doing so, he coins a new term “bosshole.”

“Bossholes make people sick,” he writes before citing a study of 6,000 British civil servants over 20 years that found that people experienced more heart attacks, angina, and deaths from heart disease when bosses criticized them unfairly, didn’t offer praise, and didn’t listen to their problems.

A Swedish study of over 3,000 workers produced a similar finding. “I would call those lousy Swedish bosses incompetent assholes, as they were bad at getting things done and treated people like dirt,” Sutton writes. Sutton’s blend of rigorous empiricism, humor, passion, and catchy phraseology is both memorable and powerful.

So is your boss a “bosshole”? Sutton provides a 20-item survey here to find out.

Comments
4 comments so far | RSS Comments RSS

Bosses often are more passive aggressive than outright constructive in their advice

Posted by STORYBURNthere | Report as abusive
 

And why would overseers care what the serfs think of them? Does any organization dismiss supervisors for actually being bad at supervision? Why would they?

Posted by txgadfly | Report as abusive
 

How about bad employees? Those who don’t show up for work, spend all day surfing the net, chat on the their cell phones, waste time, work slow, provide poor service to customers, and then expect to be paid big bucks for doing just about nothing.

Those types of individuals are a dime a dozen in this day and age. They are far more focused on surfing the web and getting on facebook than doing any actual work.

Simply put, if you want the respect of your boss and want to move up in your company earn it. Don’t do any of the above and you’ll get ahead. Do the above and don’t expect to be rewarded.

Posted by somethingtosay | Report as abusive
 

I appreciate the comments. I would like to say something about the question about whether or not organizations dismiss bad supervisors. I would argue that the best organizations do it with surprising frequency. P&G, GE, Google, are a few well-known examples — perhaps it does not happen as often as it should, but there are plenty of places that don’t tolerate persistently lousy bosses.

Posted by Bobsut | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
  •