<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bernanke’s high stakes poker game at the G-20</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2010/11/09/bernanke%E2%80%99s-high-stakes-poker-game-at-the-g-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2010/11/09/bernanke%e2%80%99s-high-stakes-poker-game-at-the-g-20/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 19:36:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: shivers1</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2010/11/09/bernanke%e2%80%99s-high-stakes-poker-game-at-the-g-20/comment-page-1/#comment-33633</link>
		<dc:creator>shivers1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 16:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=8621#comment-33633</guid>
		<description>By linking the currency the Chinese have linked the US and Chinese economy. What better than to have no currency risks with your major customer. If the US devalues then its currency will also devalue vs the rest of the world giving it competitive advantage.

When the Fed pumps money into the economy, it is in effect pumping money into the combined Chinese US economy.  Guess where all the money will end up. In low cost/ high return China ofcourse.

So you have inflation in China and deflation in USA. If the Chinese dont give in on exchange rate and they just tighten then there could be a hard landing in China. Thats after a hard landing happens in other developing economies and US enters another recession. Hopefully sense will prevail before then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By linking the currency the Chinese have linked the US and Chinese economy. What better than to have no currency risks with your major customer. If the US devalues then its currency will also devalue vs the rest of the world giving it competitive advantage.</p>
<p>When the Fed pumps money into the economy, it is in effect pumping money into the combined Chinese US economy.  Guess where all the money will end up. In low cost/ high return China ofcourse.</p>
<p>So you have inflation in China and deflation in USA. If the Chinese dont give in on exchange rate and they just tighten then there could be a hard landing in China. Thats after a hard landing happens in other developing economies and US enters another recession. Hopefully sense will prevail before then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gAnton</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2010/11/09/bernanke%e2%80%99s-high-stakes-poker-game-at-the-g-20/comment-page-1/#comment-33630</link>
		<dc:creator>gAnton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 15:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=8621#comment-33630</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s an old saying, &quot;You can&#039;t win them all&quot;. Old Witless Bernanke is proving the truth of the converse of this saying (i.e. &quot;You can lose them all&quot;). Wouldn&#039;t it be nice if he could win just one? Do you think he&#039;s going to win this one? Yeah, sure! Ha, ha, ha.

But it&#039;s not true that when Witless loses, everybody loses. With QE-1, his Wall Street banking buddies &quot;made out like Flynn&quot; (Earl Flynn was a famous 1940s era movie star and lady&#039;s man).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s an old saying, &#8220;You can&#8217;t win them all&#8221;. Old Witless Bernanke is proving the truth of the converse of this saying (i.e. &#8220;You can lose them all&#8221;). Wouldn&#8217;t it be nice if he could win just one? Do you think he&#8217;s going to win this one? Yeah, sure! Ha, ha, ha.</p>
<p>But it&#8217;s not true that when Witless loses, everybody loses. With QE-1, his Wall Street banking buddies &#8220;made out like Flynn&#8221; (Earl Flynn was a famous 1940s era movie star and lady&#8217;s man).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DeerHunter</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2010/11/09/bernanke%e2%80%99s-high-stakes-poker-game-at-the-g-20/comment-page-1/#comment-33604</link>
		<dc:creator>DeerHunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 15:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=8621#comment-33604</guid>
		<description>Rather than demand a free market floating of the yuan - This comment shows why people in the world of academia should not be writing postings for people in the real world. - Demand? - Oh Yes, China is really going to give a hoot about what we DEMAND!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rather than demand a free market floating of the yuan &#8211; This comment shows why people in the world of academia should not be writing postings for people in the real world. &#8211; Demand? &#8211; Oh Yes, China is really going to give a hoot about what we DEMAND!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barrycooper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2010/11/09/bernanke%e2%80%99s-high-stakes-poker-game-at-the-g-20/comment-page-1/#comment-33561</link>
		<dc:creator>barrycooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 22:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=8621#comment-33561</guid>
		<description>Something that took me a long time to figure out is how currency traders make money.  Keynes made a small fortune day-trading in currencies.

The key, I realized, is simple: the whole thing revolves around trying to figure out relative rates of inflation, which is to say money creation, which is to say the acquisition of private wealth by either governments or central banks.

China&#039;s export driven economy benefits an elite, at the cost of daily hardships for ordinary Chinese.  It&#039;s really not different in principle or practice than our own Robber Baron era--at least as it is portrayed in the myths of the era--with the difference that the Chinese have far, far fewer rights as workers or citizens than Americans did in our worst and darkest times.  This is, ironically, because of Chinese Communism, which purported to help workers.  

No serious person ever believed that silly notion though.  Self evidently, academics are not serious people.

What effect giving over half a trillion in unearned money to the Wall Street banking cartel will have, will depend entirely on what they do with it.  People look at inflation in the abstract, but concretely, investment professionals at some HUGE banks are getting checks in the mail.  They can spend it on any little thing their hearts desire.

They could in fact use it to take advantage of the artificially low exchange rate of the currency I prefer to call the &quot;Mao&quot; to buy up large segments of Chinese industry.  Devalued currencies work both ways: they foster exports, but they also make all domestic companies cheaper to buy. The devaluation of our currency will only happen AFTER Wall Street finishes their &quot;Wheel of Fortune&quot; style buying spree.

I wrote a series of pieces on how our system works, and how it should work.  You can read it here: http://www.goodnessmovement.com/Page14.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something that took me a long time to figure out is how currency traders make money.  Keynes made a small fortune day-trading in currencies.</p>
<p>The key, I realized, is simple: the whole thing revolves around trying to figure out relative rates of inflation, which is to say money creation, which is to say the acquisition of private wealth by either governments or central banks.</p>
<p>China&#8217;s export driven economy benefits an elite, at the cost of daily hardships for ordinary Chinese.  It&#8217;s really not different in principle or practice than our own Robber Baron era&#8211;at least as it is portrayed in the myths of the era&#8211;with the difference that the Chinese have far, far fewer rights as workers or citizens than Americans did in our worst and darkest times.  This is, ironically, because of Chinese Communism, which purported to help workers.  </p>
<p>No serious person ever believed that silly notion though.  Self evidently, academics are not serious people.</p>
<p>What effect giving over half a trillion in unearned money to the Wall Street banking cartel will have, will depend entirely on what they do with it.  People look at inflation in the abstract, but concretely, investment professionals at some HUGE banks are getting checks in the mail.  They can spend it on any little thing their hearts desire.</p>
<p>They could in fact use it to take advantage of the artificially low exchange rate of the currency I prefer to call the &#8220;Mao&#8221; to buy up large segments of Chinese industry.  Devalued currencies work both ways: they foster exports, but they also make all domestic companies cheaper to buy. The devaluation of our currency will only happen AFTER Wall Street finishes their &#8220;Wheel of Fortune&#8221; style buying spree.</p>
<p>I wrote a series of pieces on how our system works, and how it should work.  You can read it here: <a href='http://www.goodnessmovement.com/Page14.html'>http://www.goodnessmovement.com/Page14.h tml</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
