<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The fight of the century: behind the scenes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2011/05/04/the-fight-of-the-century-behind-the-scenes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2011/05/04/the-fight-of-the-century-behind-the-scenes/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 18:39:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: psikeyhackr</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2011/05/04/the-fight-of-the-century-behind-the-scenes/comment-page-1/#comment-43138</link>
		<dc:creator>psikeyhackr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 14:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=9103#comment-43138</guid>
		<description>Economists never had a debate on whether or not to ignore the depreciation of Durable Consumer Goods.  They just did it.  But then they make a big deal of this trivia like it is important.  

How many trillions of dollars have gone down a rat hole while economists pretend it does not matter?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Economists never had a debate on whether or not to ignore the depreciation of Durable Consumer Goods.  They just did it.  But then they make a big deal of this trivia like it is important.  </p>
<p>How many trillions of dollars have gone down a rat hole while economists pretend it does not matter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
