<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What are China&#8217;s next steps?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2011/05/19/what-are-chinas-next-steps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2011/05/19/what-are-chinas-next-steps/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 17:40:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mswusun</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2011/05/19/what-are-chinas-next-steps/comment-page-1/#comment-34944</link>
		<dc:creator>mswusun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 13:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=9253#comment-34944</guid>
		<description>US economy has proved that services and consumption not fitable for long term economic development. economy shouldn&#039;t unproportionally rely on service sector since this sector only contribute limited value-add and unequality through wealth redistribution. Maufacturing should be weighted more than service and consumption.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>US economy has proved that services and consumption not fitable for long term economic development. economy shouldn&#8217;t unproportionally rely on service sector since this sector only contribute limited value-add and unequality through wealth redistribution. Maufacturing should be weighted more than service and consumption.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ICEMANYAP</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2011/05/19/what-are-chinas-next-steps/comment-page-1/#comment-34934</link>
		<dc:creator>ICEMANYAP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 10:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=9253#comment-34934</guid>
		<description>Great article. very indepth analysis from all angles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article. very indepth analysis from all angles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
