<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Summers overplays stimulus, silent on zombie bank drag</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2011/08/04/summers-overestimates-the-fiscal-multiplier/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2011/08/04/summers-overestimates-the-fiscal-multiplier/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 17:40:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mward1921</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2011/08/04/summers-overestimates-the-fiscal-multiplier/comment-page-1/#comment-35851</link>
		<dc:creator>mward1921</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 14:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=9790#comment-35851</guid>
		<description>The harvesting of copper from vacant homes is part of the social dysfunction in our society of the haves and have not&#039;s. Most likely unemployed construction works who have the understanding of the system and the difficulty the banks have monitoring the millions of vacant homes in the United States abandoned by discourage and unemployed American workers. Bank of America in 2009 hired individual to go to homes in default to determine if actual people were in the homes and were they the right people to be there. Maybe should have sent a banker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The harvesting of copper from vacant homes is part of the social dysfunction in our society of the haves and have not&#8217;s. Most likely unemployed construction works who have the understanding of the system and the difficulty the banks have monitoring the millions of vacant homes in the United States abandoned by discourage and unemployed American workers. Bank of America in 2009 hired individual to go to homes in default to determine if actual people were in the homes and were they the right people to be there. Maybe should have sent a banker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robertla</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2011/08/04/summers-overestimates-the-fiscal-multiplier/comment-page-1/#comment-35844</link>
		<dc:creator>Robertla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 11:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=9790#comment-35844</guid>
		<description>good points</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good points</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coyotle</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2011/08/04/summers-overestimates-the-fiscal-multiplier/comment-page-1/#comment-35820</link>
		<dc:creator>coyotle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 20:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=9790#comment-35820</guid>
		<description>Alan Greenspan suggested not bailing out the banks and instead give monetary and tax incentives to banks in return for keeping people in their homes by using interest rate and or principal reduction. A sort of indemnification as it were. In light of the drop in the real estate market this was economically a prudent idea. I doubt seriously if any one crunched the numbers to see if it were feasible. Our government rejected that idea. Now we have millions of homes standing vacant being vandalized while the ranks of the homeless continue to grow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan Greenspan suggested not bailing out the banks and instead give monetary and tax incentives to banks in return for keeping people in their homes by using interest rate and or principal reduction. A sort of indemnification as it were. In light of the drop in the real estate market this was economically a prudent idea. I doubt seriously if any one crunched the numbers to see if it were feasible. Our government rejected that idea. Now we have millions of homes standing vacant being vandalized while the ranks of the homeless continue to grow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SGinOR</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2011/08/04/summers-overestimates-the-fiscal-multiplier/comment-page-1/#comment-35815</link>
		<dc:creator>SGinOR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 19:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=9790#comment-35815</guid>
		<description>Good points.  I think the feds should have also forced the banks to refinance mortgages to straight 30@5% loans as soon as the meltdown started.  It would have been painful and pi$$ed off the (at that time) stable and responsible borrowers but many of these folks ended up getting sucked into the abyss anyway as businesses started failing.  The banks and the rest of us would be in better shape now if they had found a way for people to keep making their house payments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points.  I think the feds should have also forced the banks to refinance mortgages to straight 30@5% loans as soon as the meltdown started.  It would have been painful and pi$$ed off the (at that time) stable and responsible borrowers but many of these folks ended up getting sucked into the abyss anyway as businesses started failing.  The banks and the rest of us would be in better shape now if they had found a way for people to keep making their house payments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
