Why the wealthy don’t object to Obama’s “class warfare”

By David Callahan
September 22, 2011
By David Callahan
The opinions expressed are his own. 

Here in the egalitarian paradise of the United States, there is apparently nothing worse than “class warfare” – which is why Republicans are trying to affix this damning label to President Obama’s new plan to raise taxes on the rich. One hitch, though, is that the billionaire Warren Buffett is not alone in his willingness to pay higher taxes. Many other wealthy Americans are also ready to see their taxes go up. The battle over taxes, its turns out, is not just between the rich and everyone else; the upper class itself is divided on this issue. That is good news for Obama, who’ll need all the help he can get to enact deficit reduction that balances spending cuts with new revenue.

Various wealthy Americans have praised the President’s tax plan since it was unveiled Monday. “It’s time for millionaires – like me and the ones in Congress – to step up to the plate and start paying their fair share,” said Guy Saperstein, a wealthy lawyer who is part of a group called Patriotic Millionaires for Fiscal Strength. Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban, not exactly known for his noblesse oblige, chimed in, writing on his blog right after Obama’s speech that paying taxes is the most “patriotic thing you can do.”

Obama’s call for higher taxes on the rich is not new. He pledged repeatedly to raise taxes on high earners during his 2008 run for President – and won the vote of these same Americans, those making over $200,000, by a comfortable margin.

Polls show that the wealthy remain more fiscally conservative than other groups, just like you might think. But a large slice of the well-heeled rejects the anti-government zealotry of today’s GOP and sees the public sector as crucial to fixing the economy. As Mark Cuban wrote on his blog, supporting stimulus efforts, “the government plays a big role in an effort to help lead us out this Great Recession. That’s reality.”

Another reality, in the view of many economic winners, is that people only get rich because they live in a society that helps them make their bundle. Andrew Carnegie famously argued that wealth creation was a collective enterprise in his essay “Gospel of Wealth,” which called for an estate tax. Warren Buffett – who says he was deeply influenced by “Gospel Wealth” – is just one of many wealthy Americans who attribute their success to such public goods as universities, infrastructure, and government-funded scientific research. “If you stick me down in the middle of Bangladesh or Peru,” Buffett has said, “you’ll find out how much this talent is going to produce in the wrong kind of soil.”

The divide among the rich over taxes has sharpened as America has moved into the Information Age. Entrepreneurs who work in a complex knowledge economy are more likely to view wealth creation in collective terms and, as a practical matter, depend more on public structures. It makes sense to them to pay higher taxes to bolster these systems.

For instance, while Silicon Valley still has plenty of libertarians, tech leaders like Reed Hastings of Netflix and the venture capitalist John Doerr have backed efforts in California to weaken the anti-tax rules of Proposition 13 and raise more revenues for public schools. In Washington State, Bill Gates has supported several ballot initiatives that would increase funding for education. Other business leaders support major new government spending on infrastructure, scientific research, and clean energy.

Meanwhile, it’s easier to buy the libertarian myth of the triumphant individual if you’ve struck it rich in the old economy – say, as a successful car dealer or retailer. These business leaders also rely on public structures to create wealth, but to a lesser degree. While no customers could get to a typical Wal-Mart without public roads, for instance, these stores – the modern equivalent of sweatshops – don’t rely on college-educated workers or capitalize on breakthroughs made in government-funded laboratories.

If you think you got rich all your own, paying taxes can seem unfair, and today’s Republican Party does a brilliant job of channeling this egotistical delusion. While any sane business leader has to be unnerved by GOP leaders who are willing to blow up the economy to block any tax increases, as we saw this summer, many others are clearly cheering such extremism, judging by all the money flowing into GOP campaign coffers. By and large, though, these people live far away from elite universities and high-tech corridors. They are the most affluent members of a Republican base that is increasingly concentrated in rural heartland states. They’re more likely to live in “retro” – not “metro” – America.

President Obama may no longer be the darling of moneyed coastal elites – that romance ended long ago – but don’t expect his new push for higher taxes to cost him further support among this crowd. To many of these elites it seems obvious that, to paraphrase Justice Holmes, taxes are the price we pay for prosperity.

David Callahan is the author of Fortunes of Change: The Rise of the Liberal Rich and the Remaking of America (Wiley).


We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/

If these rich people want to pay more taxes good for them

But they shouldnt force their views on everyone else

Lets see them pay voluntary tax if they are unhappy at how little they pay, its not for them to say everyone should pay more, but if they want to pay more themselves they easily can chose to

Every day they do not contribute extra voluntarily my respect for them drops…

Posted by ollynev | Report as abusive

You don’t distinguish between high earners and the “rich”. I suppose the fact that I make over $200,000.00 year makes me a high earner, but it does not put me in Warren Buffett’s class. Neither you nor none of the other pundits are discussing true tax reform, and continually question the “fairness” of our tax system. Clearly, the wealthy should not be able to get off scott free, something which our politicians have written into the tax code. Also, clearly, 47% of us should not be paying zero, if you are to throw the word “fair” around. Now you mention the rural areas of the US as retro america, not metro? I live in rural america and I read the same information, news etc., as you do, have a smartphone just like you do, and wonder why you have added a new “factor” to the politics of devisiveness. If you want to be fair, perhaps we should not be taxing income at all or have a flat tax that everyone pays with no exceptions, deductions or exclusions.

Posted by zotdoc | Report as abusive

I agree that being successful is exacerbated by a collective societal system; however it is due to the greed and ego on both sides (liberals and conservatives) mostly in the political realm that has damaged the system from top to bottom. Yes, the wealthy do need to pay more taxes because their greedy counterparts in high places have imparted exceptions and exclusions up to the wahoo. Get rid of the bias in the tax code and implement a flat tax % for all. Also, it would behoove you to learn to express your opinion w/out bias, Wal-mart is NOT the equivalent of a sweatshop; you forget that they started as a small business and did their business ethically and therefore prospered to the giant they are today and continue to serve a portion of the population that could not enjoy many simple pleasures did they not exist. Lastly, attempting to keep taxes low is NOT an exercise in channeling an egotistical delusion, it’s a sensible action to prevent additional monies from hard working Americans to fall in to the hands (and pockets) of corrupt individuals at all levels of government just for them to mismanage and throw it in directions it should not go. There is PLENTY of money; our government officials just do not possess the integrity to use it appropriately.

Posted by gentrca | Report as abusive

I do agree with zotdoc ; he seems to have the right answers. We should all pay our “fair share” of taxes whatever that is at whatever level we are. A flat tax would create that, it seems to me. A wise professor once said , ”take the complicated and make it simple”. NOW if we can just find more than simple minds to run congress. We, the people, should change that!

Posted by myownop | Report as abusive

Obama’s “tax the rich” politics is a dishonest Red Herring.

If all of Obama’s proposed taxes on the rich existed right now – it would cover less than 10% of Obama’s annual borrowing.

That means Obama is avoiding 90% of the problem.

A government spending problem.

Posted by Parker1227 | Report as abusive

[...] Why the wealthy don’t object to Obama’s “class warfare” [...]

[...] speaking to a bunch of rich supporters. If rich Democrats were as eager to pay higher taxes as is reported, you’d think that trumpeting the Buffett Rule would not only be the open to every Obama [...]

[...] speaking to a bunch of rich supporters. If rich Democrats were as eager to pay higher taxes as is reported, you’d think that trumpeting the Buffett Rule would not only be the open to every Obama [...]

[...] a bunch of wealthy supporters. Go figure. If rich Democrats were as eager to pay higher taxes as is reported, you’d think that trumpeting the Buffett Rule would not only be the overture to every Obama [...]

[...] up from nothing. The other, not so much. And one of them believes (along with a whole lot of his fellow millionaires) that rich people like himself should contribute more to the economic recovery and the deficit, and [...]

[...] me and the ones in Congress, to step up to the plate and start paying their fair share,” said Guy Saperstein, a wealthy lawyer and member of the group Patriotic Millionaires for Fiscal Strength, according to [...]

[...] No individual can claim credit for that 30-50% of our nation’s wealth that exists in the Built-Together Reality of our regulated markets. As Warren Buffett said, “If you stick me down in the middle of Bangladesh or Peru, you’ll find out how much this talent is ….” [...]