<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How big banks can fix their leadership blindspots</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2011/10/18/how-big-banks-can-fix-their-leadership-blindspots/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2011/10/18/how-big-banks-can-fix-their-leadership-blindspots/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 19:36:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: katepugh</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2011/10/18/how-big-banks-can-fix-their-leadership-blindspots/comment-page-1/#comment-38857</link>
		<dc:creator>katepugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 17:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=10731#comment-38857</guid>
		<description>I agree with the last comment that &quot;transparency culture is obviously not what banks want to create.&quot; Banks are kicking and screaming (privately), but publicly they are showing some readiness. Do you think these two postures will come into alignment, if they can see transparency as a sign of leadership?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the last comment that &#8220;transparency culture is obviously not what banks want to create.&#8221; Banks are kicking and screaming (privately), but publicly they are showing some readiness. Do you think these two postures will come into alignment, if they can see transparency as a sign of leadership?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MichelleRansom</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2011/10/18/how-big-banks-can-fix-their-leadership-blindspots/comment-page-1/#comment-38578</link>
		<dc:creator>MichelleRansom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 02:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=10731#comment-38578</guid>
		<description>While I like the encouragement - I suggest you might have &quot;buried the lead&quot; as they say.  In approach #3: &quot;...Look for those who are good at bringing people together, have good networks, and are inherently curious&quot;.  I think that CURIOUSITY is the key to airing the house, and gaining transparency.  Instead of hoping that CEOs ask &quot;what are the blind spots?&quot;, let&#039;s rally around the curious people and set them to work on asking questions and solving problems... something they&#039;re wired to do.  Let&#039;s make curiosity a prerequisite for the c-suite!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I like the encouragement &#8211; I suggest you might have &#8220;buried the lead&#8221; as they say.  In approach #3: &#8220;&#8230;Look for those who are good at bringing people together, have good networks, and are inherently curious&#8221;.  I think that CURIOUSITY is the key to airing the house, and gaining transparency.  Instead of hoping that CEOs ask &#8220;what are the blind spots?&#8221;, let&#8217;s rally around the curious people and set them to work on asking questions and solving problems&#8230; something they&#8217;re wired to do.  Let&#8217;s make curiosity a prerequisite for the c-suite!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
