<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The G20 needs to embrace growth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/02/24/the-g20-needs-to-embrace-growth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/02/24/the-g20-needs-to-embrace-growth/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 19:36:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wantunbiasednew</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/02/24/the-g20-needs-to-embrace-growth/comment-page-1/#comment-41866</link>
		<dc:creator>Wantunbiasednew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=11921#comment-41866</guid>
		<description>Mr. Rhodes, at first I wanted to point lack of internal cohesion of the major thoughts presented in your short aricle (In one sentence I could comment your major thoughts as: &quot;Please make insanity of US financial market deregulation the world- wide custom.&quot;). But luckily I noticed you are Citibank worker and this is just PR article/advertisement for Citibank (and &quot;Citibank act&quot;)
I think it was just ommission by Reuters staff that the article was not tagged PAID COMMERCIAL PRESENTATION.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Rhodes, at first I wanted to point lack of internal cohesion of the major thoughts presented in your short aricle (In one sentence I could comment your major thoughts as: &#8220;Please make insanity of US financial market deregulation the world- wide custom.&#8221;). But luckily I noticed you are Citibank worker and this is just PR article/advertisement for Citibank (and &#8220;Citibank act&#8221;)<br />
I think it was just ommission by Reuters staff that the article was not tagged PAID COMMERCIAL PRESENTATION.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
