Ohio chooses Romney, for now

By Connie Schultz
March 7, 2012

CLEVELAND—Every four years, Ohio’s anonymous white, male, blue-collar worker emerges from obscurity like a ghost parting the fog over Lake Erie.

Who is this mystery man? Who will he vote for this time, in this presidential election?

The rest of the nation — or at least the presidential candidates and the journalists who cover them — are dying to know. Especially now that Mitt Romney squeaked through Ohio’s Republican primary by the skin of his shiny white teeth. This rambling, unpredictable state picked Romney in March. But what does that mean for November, assuming he’s the nominee?

Too much of the national political coverage will now proceed to lump together all white, blue-collar workers, regardless of whether they belong to a union. As if union affiliation were just a talking point, rather than an elevated standard of living. It’s a false equivalence, as these are usually two different groups of voters, and non-union workers — the ones less likely to be Democratic — have increasingly been up for grabs.

This year, maybe not. Recent developments in Ohio — coupled with the elitist, no-clue narrative of Romney — could chip away at past Republican gains.

Ohio’s primary exit polls don’t tend to reflect the differences between union and non-union voters. We know that 96 percent of the electorate was white, 53 percent of it male, and 32 percent made less than $50,000 a year. That last group slightly favored Santorum.

Still, there is no breakdown for how many of the primary voters belong to a union, let alone an autoworkers union. The majority of union factory workers remain loyal to the Democratic Party, even more so than before the GOP tried to curtail collective-bargaining rights. Ohio’s union workers, particularly the tens of thousands of autoworkers and the Americans who love them, will support the president whose legislation pulled the auto industry — and their livelihood — from the brink. Just two years after the auto rescue, GM earned its largest profit ever. Its Lordstown operation in the storied Mahoning Valley is running three shifts again and produced 231,732 of the Chevrolet Cruze compact cars sold last year, outpacing Buick and Cadillac sales combined.

In the northwestern part of the state, Toledo’s auto industry is humming too. The city’s North Assembly Plant is expected to launch Chrysler’s new versions of the Dodge Avenger, Chrysler 200 sedan, Jeep Liberty and Jeep Compass.

This is good news even for non-union male workers, who want to believe that in Ohio a man can still build things with his hands and make enough money to support his family. They know that the old adage holds true: Union workers’ wages drive up non-union wages in companies that want to keep skilled workers. This is good news.

Turnout was slightly higher than in the 2008 primary (about 1.1 million voters), but the GOP race was all but decided when it got to Ohio last cycle. This year, voters appear less than thrilled with their options. Across the state, Republican voters told reporters Tuesday night that they waited until the last days — sometimes the final hours — before making up their minds. A majority of voters have reservations or dislike their candidate. Romney’s ad blitz dragged him across the finish line, but only barely, suggesting that those coveted blue-collar workers have yet to embrace the personal narrative of Romney.

Here you don’t have to talk to many working-class men, doing just about any kind of job, before the damning narrative of Romney rises like bile. Their mantra: He wanted the auto industry to go bankrupt, and this was a double betrayal: of autoworkers and of his roots. Romney, after all, grew up in neighboring Michigan, which produces even more cars than Ohio.

Last fall, something else happened here that stunned Republicans and has dogged them ever since. They failed to predict the voters’ fury after they passed a state law that gutted public workers’ rights to collectively bargain for wages and benefits. The outrage didn’t come from just the 350,000 public employees affected, including police officers, firefighters, teachers and state workers. It also came from all those Ohioans who knew, respected and even loved those 350,000. A popular protest button summed up the collective mood pretty well: United We Stand, Divided We Beg.

The legislation, known as SB 5, was similar to Wisconsin’s anti-union law, with the notable exception that in Ohio, voters could repeal it. To do so, activists had to gather 231,000 valid signatures to get the issue on the ballot; they collected five times that number. Last November, 61 percent of Ohio voters defeated SB 5, and Republican Gov. John Kasich’s already tenuous approval rating tanked.

***

Which brings us to the big question: now what?

A Republican has never won the White House without winning Ohio. So, every four years we get to be a little smug. It’s a wildly diverse state, and we’re used to being misunderstood. In a 2004 special election series, the Cleveland Plain Dealer divvied up the state into the Five Ohios. Eight years later, the boundaries hold. You can start the day in the liberal, industrial heartland of the northeast, where the Cleveland Clinic is the largest employer, and drive only two hours south on I-77 before you’re standing in the foothills of Appalachia, the poorest and least educated part of the state. A lot of Clevelanders talk like they’re from Brooklyn. In some parts of Cincinnati, you’d swear you were in Kentucky — which you are, if you land at Cincinnati’s airport.

It’s hard to get a defining quote for a state that is so indefinable, so darn big. That never stops the national media from trying.

You can find someone to say just about anything in Ohio. Count on that in the months ahead. Reporters will find the woman who cares only about jobs, living next to the woman who wants to bring the troops home from Afghanistan but whose sister is still fuming about access to contraception. You’ll hear about the pro-union guy who drives the Honda, and the Tea Party activist who loves his Medicare and wants the government to stay out of his healthcare. They’re here, all right, but they aren’t the ones both parties need to court.

Across the country, the usual stories about those whacky Ohioans will unfurl like paper napkins at county fairs.

Meanwhile, those of us who live here will be keeping a watchful eye on those gruff, blue-collar workers. Despite their hard, non-union times, they still believe Ohio is a place where real men make things, big things. And they want a president who thinks so, too.

PHOTO: Republican presidential candidate and former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney talks to reporters on his campaign plane before leaving Columbus, Ohio, March 6, 2012. REUTERS/Brian Snyder. A voter looks over his ballot to place a vote at a polling station in Steubenville, Ohio, March 6, 2012, as Republicans hold their “Super Tuesday” presidential primary in 10 states. REUTERS/Jim Young

10 comments

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/

I really hate how the big rust belt failure states have so much influence over our political system. These folks have run their states into the ground and now expect the federal government to do something. If they were honest places they would fix their problems themselves, but I suspect they have lived off of the political fat for too long to remember what real work is. It’s really unfair that we get stuck with the garbage choices they make.

Posted by brotherkenny4 | Report as abusive

brotherkenny4, When you are brotherkenny5 or 6 you will learn that you have just been fed some liberal soup from the wife of one of the most liberal Senators in Washington, Democrat-Sherrod Brown. Did you notice how condescending she is? Did you notice her elitist attitude toward the people who voted for her husband? The parts of Ohio she smugly disparages are the most Democrat areas of the State. But hey, she knows those same people she just insulted will still vote for her hubby. It’s just part of being a Democrat.

Posted by BobNews | Report as abusive

Wow! I don’t know what article the above two people just read, but it sure wasn’t the one I read. The reason I love Connie Schultz is because she writes in such an “Everywoman” style. I saw no hint of condescension or smugness. It seems to me she hit the nail on the head. Ohio has a little of everything, and we like our politicians practical – hence our fondness for her husband, Sherrod Brown. Just get the job done, and keep our people working. No big ideological arguments; no talking down. The people who DO have ideological agendas – perhaps the above two posters? – are not always so pleased with the way things turn out, but they are usually in the minority.

Posted by patrushka | Report as abusive

Barack Obama went to Harvard. He has an academic background. If that isn’t elite I don’t want is.

Democrats trying to disparage Republicans for elitism is like Communists cal lined Nazis’ inhumane.

Posted by quattro4 | Report as abusive

I meant “calling”.

Posted by quattro4 | Report as abusive

And Republicans trying to call Mitt just an ordinary guy are delusional. Ordinary guys don’t have quarter billion dollar fortunes invested in offshore tax havens. Newt trying to say he’s not part of the ways of Washington, DC, is also delusional; he’s personally responsible for much of the ultrapartisanship the GOP has shown since the Clinton administration. Santorum did his share too; he took advantage of the minute each senator gets every morning to do nothing but hurl insults at Clinton. Paul has been there long enough that he should have term limited himself out by now given Newt’s Contract with America congressional term limit plank.

Posted by borisjimbo | Report as abusive

The reason elections are decided in the rust belt is that the costs are pretty much slamdunks for the democrat party. The 2012 election will probably be decided in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Iowa, Missouri.

Posted by berts | Report as abusive

For Mitt Romney to win Ohio given all his negative comments regarding the auto industry and his willingness to let it die, it will take a “Scorch the Earth Obama negative campaign”, which of course is what Romeny and the Koch Brothers plan on doing. Hopefully, when all the dust settles, the last man stangind with be Obama!

Posted by widollar | Report as abusive

Wow. I am a registered Dem and a woman. We all know these candidates are millionaires several times over’ Obama is too. We all know the contraceptive issue is a trumped up gig to draw our focus away from the fact that Obamacare is unconstitutional. We all recognize that the Supreme Court will do nothing to put an end to Obamacare; most of them dislike our constitution and rather enjoy seeing it destroyed. And besides, I can walk into any Planned Parenthood center and get contraceptives. If we are truly concerned about women’s health, dispense them at no cost trough an established entity. If anger motivates you, I hope you are angry. I hope you vote for someone other than the incumbent. Connie should not be writing a political column while her husband is in office either.

Posted by taxpayertilley | Report as abusive

I’m basically a liberal. But I voted for the repeal of SB 5, which would have denied collective bargaining to union member who work for the government. And I voted for the repeal even though I knew I was standing up for union workers who lean to the right or are Republican. For me at least, that’s what it means to be an Ohio Buckeye.
Also, I agree with patruska about the comments from brotherkenny4 and BobNews. The usual trolls mad at the world.

Posted by rewiredhogdog | Report as abusive