<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We are letting Assad win</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/03/12/we-are-letting-assad-win/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/03/12/we-are-letting-assad-win/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 19:57:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darnoc</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/03/12/we-are-letting-assad-win/comment-page-1/#comment-42255</link>
		<dc:creator>Darnoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 22:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=12073#comment-42255</guid>
		<description>Another Failure of our all too feeble HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH, alas !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another Failure of our all too feeble HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH, alas !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fromkin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/03/12/we-are-letting-assad-win/comment-page-1/#comment-42229</link>
		<dc:creator>Fromkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 20:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=12073#comment-42229</guid>
		<description>The world doesn&#039;t care about Qatar and Soud Arabia. The most tyrannical regimes on the plannet, and darlings of the west. If the west calls them&quot;our allies&quot;, the rest of the world doesn&#039;t want to be part and victim of this murderous alliance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The world doesn&#8217;t care about Qatar and Soud Arabia. The most tyrannical regimes on the plannet, and darlings of the west. If the west calls them&#8221;our allies&#8221;, the rest of the world doesn&#8217;t want to be part and victim of this murderous alliance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fromkin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/03/12/we-are-letting-assad-win/comment-page-1/#comment-42227</link>
		<dc:creator>Fromkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 20:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=12073#comment-42227</guid>
		<description>Nancy needs to go to Syria to figh Assad. What&#039;s wrong with journalists nowadays? It seems that they have lost their journalistic minds. Advocating violence is not the journalistic way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nancy needs to go to Syria to figh Assad. What&#8217;s wrong with journalists nowadays? It seems that they have lost their journalistic minds. Advocating violence is not the journalistic way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fromkin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/03/12/we-are-letting-assad-win/comment-page-1/#comment-42226</link>
		<dc:creator>Fromkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 20:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=12073#comment-42226</guid>
		<description>Nancy needs to go to Syria to figh Assad. What&#039;s wrong with journalists nowadays? It seems that they have lost their journalistic minds. Advocating violence is not the journalistic way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nancy needs to go to Syria to figh Assad. What&#8217;s wrong with journalists nowadays? It seems that they have lost their journalistic minds. Advocating violence is not the journalistic way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HereAndThere</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/03/12/we-are-letting-assad-win/comment-page-1/#comment-42224</link>
		<dc:creator>HereAndThere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 19:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=12073#comment-42224</guid>
		<description>Sure Nancy, sure.  Are you going there yourself?  Are you sending your kids / family members to combat, or are you expecting someone else&#039;s kids to do the fighting?

This is an Arab problem.  We cannot go fight every injustice in the world.  Heck, there is so much injustice, abuse and inequality in the US!

Bombing?  So what happens when Syria&#039;s air defenses shoot down a couple of our planes?  Do we send in the Marines and then the Army?  And here we are, the US with boots in yet one more Muslim nation.

We cannot be the policeman, prosecutor and judge for the entire world.

Obama is doing the right thing in trying to get the entire world to work together in solving issues.  Everyone needs to get involved.  Everyone needs to feel the pain.

We can no longer afford in money or blood the pursuit of interventionist policies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure Nancy, sure.  Are you going there yourself?  Are you sending your kids / family members to combat, or are you expecting someone else&#8217;s kids to do the fighting?</p>
<p>This is an Arab problem.  We cannot go fight every injustice in the world.  Heck, there is so much injustice, abuse and inequality in the US!</p>
<p>Bombing?  So what happens when Syria&#8217;s air defenses shoot down a couple of our planes?  Do we send in the Marines and then the Army?  And here we are, the US with boots in yet one more Muslim nation.</p>
<p>We cannot be the policeman, prosecutor and judge for the entire world.</p>
<p>Obama is doing the right thing in trying to get the entire world to work together in solving issues.  Everyone needs to get involved.  Everyone needs to feel the pain.</p>
<p>We can no longer afford in money or blood the pursuit of interventionist policies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blogoleum</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/03/12/we-are-letting-assad-win/comment-page-1/#comment-42223</link>
		<dc:creator>blogoleum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 15:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=12073#comment-42223</guid>
		<description>1. Is the author willing to die for the freedom of Syria? You should mention it - it&#039;s important.

2. If you want peace in Syria, you&#039;ll have to encourage the rebels to stop fighting, stop protesting. It will save lives.

3. The transport of dangerous contraband throughout the region is a larger goal than freeing Syria, more lives are at stake.

4. Because technology has sufficiently advanced, and all countries have access to knowledge, we are all in danger. This is the only argument that gets me willing to die for freeing Syrians, or anyone else. Until their leaders AND our leaders speak to the global problems we all face, the arguments to solve tyranny piecemeal will always come up short.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Is the author willing to die for the freedom of Syria? You should mention it &#8211; it&#8217;s important.</p>
<p>2. If you want peace in Syria, you&#8217;ll have to encourage the rebels to stop fighting, stop protesting. It will save lives.</p>
<p>3. The transport of dangerous contraband throughout the region is a larger goal than freeing Syria, more lives are at stake.</p>
<p>4. Because technology has sufficiently advanced, and all countries have access to knowledge, we are all in danger. This is the only argument that gets me willing to die for freeing Syrians, or anyone else. Until their leaders AND our leaders speak to the global problems we all face, the arguments to solve tyranny piecemeal will always come up short.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ARJTurgot2</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/03/12/we-are-letting-assad-win/comment-page-1/#comment-42222</link>
		<dc:creator>ARJTurgot2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 13:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=12073#comment-42222</guid>
		<description>Must be terribly frustrating for the old Clinton entourage to be so close to power, and not be able to touch it.  Hillary of course stumbled badly when the Egypt thing started.  I mean, really, &#039;the Murbaraks are nice people because Bill and I were their guests&#039;...  

Now, Assad; slimebag to be sure, but Obama seems to be reluctant to send 19 year old kids out to die.  And the Europeans, pretty much useless.  It&#039;s just getting soooo hard to teach the world how to live.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Must be terribly frustrating for the old Clinton entourage to be so close to power, and not be able to touch it.  Hillary of course stumbled badly when the Egypt thing started.  I mean, really, &#8216;the Murbaraks are nice people because Bill and I were their guests&#8217;&#8230;  </p>
<p>Now, Assad; slimebag to be sure, but Obama seems to be reluctant to send 19 year old kids out to die.  And the Europeans, pretty much useless.  It&#8217;s just getting soooo hard to teach the world how to live.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Qeds</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/03/12/we-are-letting-assad-win/comment-page-1/#comment-42221</link>
		<dc:creator>Qeds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 13:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=12073#comment-42221</guid>
		<description>Horrible article. No sustainability concerns, no long-run vision, just a preach for interventionism. Oh so you want to support the Qatari and Saudi terrorists that you already support anyway to create even more chaos in Syria. And no concerns raised about what the terrorist rebels will do to the Shia, Christian and Kurdish minorities in case they win the &quot;revolution&quot;. Shameful article for someone who pretends it has any idea of fair politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Horrible article. No sustainability concerns, no long-run vision, just a preach for interventionism. Oh so you want to support the Qatari and Saudi terrorists that you already support anyway to create even more chaos in Syria. And no concerns raised about what the terrorist rebels will do to the Shia, Christian and Kurdish minorities in case they win the &#8220;revolution&#8221;. Shameful article for someone who pretends it has any idea of fair politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greenspy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/03/12/we-are-letting-assad-win/comment-page-1/#comment-42219</link>
		<dc:creator>greenspy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=12073#comment-42219</guid>
		<description>Sorry, I meant terrific article, not terrible article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I meant terrific article, not terrible article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greenspy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/03/12/we-are-letting-assad-win/comment-page-1/#comment-42218</link>
		<dc:creator>greenspy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=12073#comment-42218</guid>
		<description>Terrible article and it makes a whole bunch of sense to me. If we allow dictators to kill thier own people at any cost, there is a real problem here. I agree with BuffaloGirl too. Supporting a group of neighbouring countries going in without sending in American troops may be our best bet for solving this conflict. If American forces do go in, set a concrete deadline of a year to get this done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terrible article and it makes a whole bunch of sense to me. If we allow dictators to kill thier own people at any cost, there is a real problem here. I agree with BuffaloGirl too. Supporting a group of neighbouring countries going in without sending in American troops may be our best bet for solving this conflict. If American forces do go in, set a concrete deadline of a year to get this done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
