The case for letting Khalid Sheikh Mohammed live

By Nicholas Wapshott
April 13, 2012

What should be done with Khalid Sheikh Mohammed? If the Defense Department is to be believed, the chief planner of the 9/11 attacks on America is guilty of mass murder and crimes against humanity. Even if the evidence elicited by waterboarding him 183 times is void, his declaration in 2002 that “I was responsible for the 9/11 Operation from A to Z” should ensure conviction.

In addition to the 9/11 attacks that killed 2,973, he is credited with commissioning shoe-bomber Richard Reid to down a transatlantic jetliner laden with 300 passengers; planning the 1993 attempt to fell the Twin Towers, the Bali nightclub bombing that killed 200 and a bomb attack in Istanbul in 2003 that killed 60; as well as plots to assassinate Pope John Paul II and Bill Clinton and to demolish the Empire State Building and the Brooklyn Bridge. For those who would argue Mohammed is a war combatant rather than a dangerous psychotic, it should also be noted that he personally sawed off the head of the American reporter Daniel Pearl.

Mohammed and his co-conspirators face the death penalty, but it is by no means certain the prosecution will ask for it. There are a number of practical reasons Mohammed should instead live out his days buried in the vaults of a maximum security prison. He desperately wants to end his days of idle impotence and emerge as an inspirational figure in the Islamist war against the West. “This is what I wish, to be a martyr for a long time. I will, God willing, have this, by you,” he explained in 2008. He would be sooner forgotten alive than dead; just think of Charles Manson.

Moreover, Mohammed remains a key source for understanding al Qaeda’s modus operandi and its next moves. He has been spilling the names and whereabouts of sleeper cells, and it was his information that led to the discovery and death by Navy SEAL of Osama bin Laden. Better alive and singing than taking his secrets to the grave.

Demanding the death penalty would also entail a far longer trial, giving Mohammed more opportunities to have his remarks in court relayed to his followers. A capital sentence would open up a lengthy avenue of appeals, keeping him and his murderous creed in the headlines. Asking for life imprisonment would cut that short.

But by far the most important argument against the judicial killing of Mohammed lies in the nature of what the Princeton sage Bernard Lewis calls the “clash of civilizations” between Islamist fundamentalism and the Judeo-Christian West in which Khalid Sheikh Mohammed is a mere speck.

The core of our beliefs is not represented by the clamor for eye-for-an-eye retribution that emerges when our peaceful way of life is shattered by terrorism. It is to be found in the key instrument of the Jewish faith, the Ten Commandments, and in the words of Jesus Christ. The Sixth Commandment could not be more clear: “Thou shalt not kill.” And Christ’s example is one of meeting violence with forgiveness and turning the other cheek.

As Lewis wisely warns: “It is crucially important that we on our side should not be provoked into an equally historic but also equally irrational reaction against that rival.” And it is particularly important not to lose sight of our defining values when administering justice. That is why the issue of whether waterboarding is torture is so pertinent. To commit an act of barbarism in defense of our civilization is to contradict the heart of our beliefs and provide ammunition to our enemies.

In the last five years, the movement to protect life in the womb has been matched by a quieter drive to abandon the death penalty, leading to the ending of capital punishment in New Jersey, New Mexico, Illinois, Nebraska, New York and Kansas, bringing the number of abolition states to 14, plus the District of Columbia. Connecticut is on the brink of abolition, and California will vote in November whether to follow suit.

To spare the life of  Khalid Sheikh Mohammed is not to free Barabbas but to show mercy in the face of profound provocation. It is not only the right thing to do, it is the civilized thing to do, and, if our justice system is to properly defend our civilization, it is also the practical thing to do.

PHOTO: Khalid Sheikh Mohammed is shown in this file photograph during his arrest on March 1, 2003.  REUTERS/Courtesy U.S. News & World Report/Files

5 comments

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/

There’s a lot of useless, handwringing bs in this piece.

I favor locking him up in solitary and throwing away the key for the simple reason that life w/o parole in solitary in a supermax is worse than death.

This is especially true for a religious nut that believes he’s going to paradise and wants to be a martyr.

Posted by SarcasticBtard | Report as abusive

It has to made clear that the rest of the world will extract a price from the Islamists and their supporters particularly the later for violence and support for violence and intolerance. Every thing should done to make the financial and political supports lives uncomfortable and insecure.

Posted by SamuelReich | Report as abusive

I totally agree. The death penalty is barbaric, just as abortion is.

Posted by Heinz05 | Report as abusive

While I agree with the idea that we should not execute KSM it has nothing to do with being “civilized” or “showing mercy in the face of profound provocation”. If you believe that showing mercy will be seen as anything other than impotence, political correctness and weakness by the people KSM stands for and represents, then you do not understand the way they think. Not even a little bit.

KSM should be made to live out his life in solitary confinement in one of the Super Max facilities and not be put to death for one reason and one reason only – because it’s the most suitable punishment for the heinous acts he has perpetrated.

http://politicalcapital.wordpress.com

Posted by PoliticalCapita | Report as abusive

Forgiving is the attribute of Almighty and justice as well.I hope the Almighty forgives America for its wars on flimsy reasons.There is nothing calling my life is more worthier than others.Killing innocents in abhorrent no matter who does it.

Posted by Ismailtaimur | Report as abusive