Comments on: Since when has G-anything run the world?

By: Sal20111

Sal20111 — Wed, 02 May 2012 18:28:57 +0000

A thoughtful article. The G-whatever can’t and shouldn’t try to contol the world economy, in fact their governments shouldn’t even try it in their own domestic economies but leave a level playing field for the private sector.

The good and the bad of globalisation is in the detail: it can be good insofar as it creates mutual economic interests and trading which discourages conflict and the prospects of war (the devil at work in humankind). It can be bad if a few corporations have the various governments in their pockets to extinguish local companies, creating imperfect competition and toxic effects. The latter is what the banking industry seems to have done in the West.

By: gee.la

gee.la — Wed, 02 May 2012 16:38:30 +0000

G means gravity. G0 means free fall.

By: HoofHugs

HoofHugs — Tue, 01 May 2012 23:19:09 +0000

What about the implementation of UN Agenda 21? The Forestry Service, the Bureau of Land Management, The Nature Center, Conservation Districts, etc. Read Debbie Coffey’s articles on the implementation of UN Agenda 21.

By: cp61

cp61 — Tue, 01 May 2012 18:42:43 +0000

Oh I’m sorry, How rude of me.

This was a very enjoyable read. thank you

By: cp61

cp61 — Tue, 01 May 2012 18:40:43 +0000

Well,
I think The illusion of globalism stems from ideas or ideals left over from the 19th century.
business’s in Europe might have needed a UN to keep nationalism from interrupting the ebb and flow of commerce.
But there is the Bomb now and a lot more players.
besides, no one is really quite sure that an empire is necessary.
As long as there is a fiat currency, and navigation is reasonably safe, globalism will just be a watch word for mind your own business.