Comments on: Can the SEC ever improve? http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/09/07/can-the-sec-ever-improve/ Thu, 23 May 2013 11:09:22 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2 By: running http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/09/07/can-the-sec-ever-improve/comment-page-1/#comment-59839 running Wed, 12 Sep 2012 23:42:42 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=13937#comment-59839 there will always be Pirates, its the way of the world or theres always going to be ways there will always be Pirates, its the way of the world or theres always going to be ways

]]> By: Samrch http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/09/07/can-the-sec-ever-improve/comment-page-1/#comment-59715 Samrch Mon, 10 Sep 2012 13:03:00 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=13937#comment-59715 We have the best politicians money can buy. Do not expect them to put strong regulators of finance. Look at Greenspan's testimony trying to enplane why he believed markets are self regulating. Every school boy knows of depressions caused by asset bubbles. It is also well know people buy assets when prices are going up and dump when they are going down. Which is instability. Things that one buys to use up are gotten when prices are down. We have the best politicians money can buy. Do not expect them to put strong regulators of finance.

Look at Greenspan’s testimony trying to enplane why he believed markets are self regulating. Every school boy knows of depressions caused by asset bubbles. It is also well know people buy assets when prices are going up and dump when they are going down. Which is instability. Things that one buys to use up are gotten when prices are down.

]]> By: Samrch http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/09/07/can-the-sec-ever-improve/comment-page-1/#comment-59656 Samrch Mon, 10 Sep 2012 10:04:07 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=13937#comment-59656 There is a lot of money finance and we have the best politicians that money can buy. That means they will appoint weak regulators. In the documentary "Flaw", Greenspan tried to enplane to senators why pushed the idea asset markets self regulating and stable. This in spite of the fact every school boy knows about depressions due to asset bubbles and old time robber barons (the present ones will become visible in time). Also it well known assets (unlike goods that get used up) are only attractive when their price is going up fast and hard to sell when the price going down. That by itself would create bubbles. That means Greenspan was a fool or on some sort of take or political pressure. Many of those in congress grilling finance CEOs pushed easy loan policies and deregulation before the 2008 crash. There is a lot of money finance and we have the best politicians that money can buy. That means they will appoint weak regulators. In the documentary “Flaw”, Greenspan tried to enplane to senators why pushed the idea asset markets self regulating and stable. This in spite of the fact every school boy knows about depressions due to asset bubbles and old time robber barons (the present ones will become visible in time). Also it well known assets (unlike goods that get used up) are only attractive when their price is going up fast and hard to sell when the price going down. That by itself would create bubbles.

That means Greenspan was a fool or on some sort of take or political pressure. Many of those in congress grilling finance CEOs pushed easy loan policies and deregulation before the 2008 crash.

]]> By: Samrch http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/09/07/can-the-sec-ever-improve/comment-page-1/#comment-59657 Samrch Mon, 10 Sep 2012 10:04:07 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=13937#comment-59657 There is a lot of money finance and we have the best politicians that money can buy. That means they will appoint weak regulators. In the documentary "Flaw", Greenspan tried to enplane to senators why pushed the idea asset markets self regulating and stable. This in spite of the fact every school boy knows about depressions due to asset bubbles and old time robber barons (the present ones will become visible in time). Also it well known assets (unlike goods that get used up) are only attractive when their price is going up fast and hard to sell when the price going down. That by itself would create bubbles. That means Greenspan was a fool or on some sort of take or political pressure. Many of those in congress grilling finance CEOs pushed easy loan policies and deregulation before the 2008 crash. There is a lot of money finance and we have the best politicians that money can buy. That means they will appoint weak regulators. In the documentary “Flaw”, Greenspan tried to enplane to senators why pushed the idea asset markets self regulating and stable. This in spite of the fact every school boy knows about depressions due to asset bubbles and old time robber barons (the present ones will become visible in time). Also it well known assets (unlike goods that get used up) are only attractive when their price is going up fast and hard to sell when the price going down. That by itself would create bubbles.

That means Greenspan was a fool or on some sort of take or political pressure. Many of those in congress grilling finance CEOs pushed easy loan policies and deregulation before the 2008 crash.

]]> By: Samrch http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/09/07/can-the-sec-ever-improve/comment-page-1/#comment-59658 Samrch Mon, 10 Sep 2012 10:04:07 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=13937#comment-59658 There is a lot of money finance and we have the best politicians that money can buy. That means they will appoint weak regulators. In the documentary "Flaw", Greenspan tried to enplane to senators why pushed the idea asset markets self regulating and stable. This in spite of the fact every school boy knows about depressions due to asset bubbles and old time robber barons (the present ones will become visible in time). Also it well known assets (unlike goods that get used up) are only attractive when their price is going up fast and hard to sell when the price going down. That by itself would create bubbles. That means Greenspan was a fool or on some sort of take or political pressure. Many of those in congress grilling finance CEOs pushed easy loan policies and deregulation before the 2008 crash. There is a lot of money finance and we have the best politicians that money can buy. That means they will appoint weak regulators. In the documentary “Flaw”, Greenspan tried to enplane to senators why pushed the idea asset markets self regulating and stable. This in spite of the fact every school boy knows about depressions due to asset bubbles and old time robber barons (the present ones will become visible in time). Also it well known assets (unlike goods that get used up) are only attractive when their price is going up fast and hard to sell when the price going down. That by itself would create bubbles.

That means Greenspan was a fool or on some sort of take or political pressure. Many of those in congress grilling finance CEOs pushed easy loan policies and deregulation before the 2008 crash.

]]> By: Samrch http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/09/07/can-the-sec-ever-improve/comment-page-1/#comment-59659 Samrch Mon, 10 Sep 2012 10:04:07 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=13937#comment-59659 There is a lot of money finance and we have the best politicians that money can buy. That means they will appoint weak regulators. In the documentary "Flaw", Greenspan tried to enplane to senators why pushed the idea asset markets self regulating and stable. This in spite of the fact every school boy knows about depressions due to asset bubbles and old time robber barons (the present ones will become visible in time). Also it well known assets (unlike goods that get used up) are only attractive when their price is going up fast and hard to sell when the price going down. That by itself would create bubbles. That means Greenspan was a fool or on some sort of take or political pressure. Many of those in congress grilling finance CEOs pushed easy loan policies and deregulation before the 2008 crash. There is a lot of money finance and we have the best politicians that money can buy. That means they will appoint weak regulators. In the documentary “Flaw”, Greenspan tried to enplane to senators why pushed the idea asset markets self regulating and stable. This in spite of the fact every school boy knows about depressions due to asset bubbles and old time robber barons (the present ones will become visible in time). Also it well known assets (unlike goods that get used up) are only attractive when their price is going up fast and hard to sell when the price going down. That by itself would create bubbles.

That means Greenspan was a fool or on some sort of take or political pressure. Many of those in congress grilling finance CEOs pushed easy loan policies and deregulation before the 2008 crash.

]]> By: Samrch http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/09/07/can-the-sec-ever-improve/comment-page-1/#comment-59660 Samrch Mon, 10 Sep 2012 10:04:07 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=13937#comment-59660 There is a lot of money finance and we have the best politicians that money can buy. That means they will appoint weak regulators. In the documentary "Flaw", Greenspan tried to enplane to senators why pushed the idea asset markets self regulating and stable. This in spite of the fact every school boy knows about depressions due to asset bubbles and old time robber barons (the present ones will become visible in time). Also it well known assets (unlike goods that get used up) are only attractive when their price is going up fast and hard to sell when the price going down. That by itself would create bubbles. That means Greenspan was a fool or on some sort of take or political pressure. Many of those in congress grilling finance CEOs pushed easy loan policies and deregulation before the 2008 crash. There is a lot of money finance and we have the best politicians that money can buy. That means they will appoint weak regulators. In the documentary “Flaw”, Greenspan tried to enplane to senators why pushed the idea asset markets self regulating and stable. This in spite of the fact every school boy knows about depressions due to asset bubbles and old time robber barons (the present ones will become visible in time). Also it well known assets (unlike goods that get used up) are only attractive when their price is going up fast and hard to sell when the price going down. That by itself would create bubbles.

That means Greenspan was a fool or on some sort of take or political pressure. Many of those in congress grilling finance CEOs pushed easy loan policies and deregulation before the 2008 crash.

]]> By: Samrch http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/09/07/can-the-sec-ever-improve/comment-page-1/#comment-59654 Samrch Mon, 10 Sep 2012 10:03:23 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=13937#comment-59654 There is a lot of money finance and we have the best politicians that money can buy. That means they will appoint weak regulators. In the documentary "Flaw", Greenspan tried to enplane to senators why pushed the idea asset markets self regulating and stable. This in spite of the fact every school boy knows about depressions due to asset bubbles and old time robber barons (the present ones will become visible in time). Also it well known assets (unlike goods that get used up) are only attractive when their price is going up fast and hard to sell when the price going down. That by itself would create bubbles. That means Greenspan was a fool or on some sort of take or political pressure. Many of those in congress grilling finance CEOs pushed easy loan policies and deregulation before the 2008 crash. There is a lot of money finance and we have the best politicians that money can buy. That means they will appoint weak regulators. In the documentary “Flaw”, Greenspan tried to enplane to senators why pushed the idea asset markets self regulating and stable. This in spite of the fact every school boy knows about depressions due to asset bubbles and old time robber barons (the present ones will become visible in time). Also it well known assets (unlike goods that get used up) are only attractive when their price is going up fast and hard to sell when the price going down. That by itself would create bubbles.

That means Greenspan was a fool or on some sort of take or political pressure. Many of those in congress grilling finance CEOs pushed easy loan policies and deregulation before the 2008 crash.

]]> By: Mott http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/09/07/can-the-sec-ever-improve/comment-page-1/#comment-59586 Mott Sun, 09 Sep 2012 16:37:42 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=13937#comment-59586 It's the approach that matters - first go after the low-to-mid-end fraudsters that cannot defend themselves well and win cases and learn the tricks of the trade that'll sharpen the maturity of data-collection and presentation. Following that, catching the big-fish in the same lines should prove easy. It’s the approach that matters – first go after the low-to-mid-end fraudsters that cannot defend themselves well and win cases and learn the tricks of the trade that’ll sharpen the maturity of data-collection and presentation. Following that, catching the big-fish in the same lines should prove easy.

]]> By: gordo53 http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/09/07/can-the-sec-ever-improve/comment-page-1/#comment-59530 gordo53 Sat, 08 Sep 2012 16:14:58 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=13937#comment-59530 Government agencies never seem to have enough money. Better get used to that because there will almost certainly be less money in the future. Government agencies never seem to have enough money. Better get used to that because there will almost certainly be less money in the future.

]]>