<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The great paradox of Hobsbawm&#8217;s choice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/10/03/the-great-paradox-of-hobsbawms-choice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/10/03/the-great-paradox-of-hobsbawms-choice/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 19:36:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: EidoTee</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/10/03/the-great-paradox-of-hobsbawms-choice/comment-page-1/#comment-61770</link>
		<dc:creator>EidoTee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2012 15:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=14253#comment-61770</guid>
		<description>I feel that he was not willing renounce Communism, because Stalin&#039;s regime was not a true interpretation of Marx&#039;s work. Stalin was a nationalist and an opportunist, using the Russian sphere of influence to advance Russian aims rather than that of Eastern Europe. I think he was true to the pure form of Communism, which others wrongly extrapolate to mean that he supported Stalin&#039;s phony interpretation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel that he was not willing renounce Communism, because Stalin&#8217;s regime was not a true interpretation of Marx&#8217;s work. Stalin was a nationalist and an opportunist, using the Russian sphere of influence to advance Russian aims rather than that of Eastern Europe. I think he was true to the pure form of Communism, which others wrongly extrapolate to mean that he supported Stalin&#8217;s phony interpretation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sujith03</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/10/03/the-great-paradox-of-hobsbawms-choice/comment-page-1/#comment-61695</link>
		<dc:creator>sujith03</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 11:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=14253#comment-61695</guid>
		<description>Nice post, but I think you have written this post with a prejudiced mindset. It&#039;s allright, you have gauged communism with those men who&#039;ve failed to upheld it properl, mindfully leaving out others like himwho have influenced public.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post, but I think you have written this post with a prejudiced mindset. It&#8217;s allright, you have gauged communism with those men who&#8217;ve failed to upheld it properl, mindfully leaving out others like himwho have influenced public.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
