<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The billionaires next door</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/10/15/the-billionaires-next-door/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/10/15/the-billionaires-next-door/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 19:32:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ludwig44</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/10/15/the-billionaires-next-door/comment-page-1/#comment-64407</link>
		<dc:creator>ludwig44</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 02:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=14597#comment-64407</guid>
		<description>One American is worth more than four non-Americans?  Really?  Do you have a formula re this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One American is worth more than four non-Americans?  Really?  Do you have a formula re this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1bar1</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/10/15/the-billionaires-next-door/comment-page-1/#comment-64372</link>
		<dc:creator>1bar1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2012 18:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=14597#comment-64372</guid>
		<description>&quot;I can hire half the working class to kill the other half.&quot;
Jay Gould, Robber Baron</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I can hire half the working class to kill the other half.&#8221;<br />
Jay Gould, Robber Baron</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: haracters</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/10/15/the-billionaires-next-door/comment-page-1/#comment-64366</link>
		<dc:creator>haracters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2012 17:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=14597#comment-64366</guid>
		<description>I wonder what Ms. Freeland&#039;s salary is. I hazard a bit more than the average in the developed world, and a lot more than the $2.50 (or less!) a day that half the world tries to subsist on. No doubt she knows all about the rest of us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder what Ms. Freeland&#8217;s salary is. I hazard a bit more than the average in the developed world, and a lot more than the $2.50 (or less!) a day that half the world tries to subsist on. No doubt she knows all about the rest of us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: circulo110</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/10/15/the-billionaires-next-door/comment-page-1/#comment-64215</link>
		<dc:creator>circulo110</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2012 17:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=14597#comment-64215</guid>
		<description>Wow, Romny. That sure is an articulate response.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, Romny. That sure is an articulate response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: romry</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/10/15/the-billionaires-next-door/comment-page-1/#comment-64060</link>
		<dc:creator>romry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 20:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=14597#comment-64060</guid>
		<description>Ma&#039;am, why don&#039;t you move to Cuba, or Chicago, or California? You have you head up your Communist,Socialist But. Your pointy head is showing,too.I hope you don&#039;t sell a fricking one of your books-you MORON.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ma&#8217;am, why don&#8217;t you move to Cuba, or Chicago, or California? You have you head up your Communist,Socialist But. Your pointy head is showing,too.I hope you don&#8217;t sell a fricking one of your books-you MORON.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ptiffany</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/10/15/the-billionaires-next-door/comment-page-1/#comment-63550</link>
		<dc:creator>ptiffany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 19:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=14597#comment-63550</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s time to admit that the America Class War is long over.  The plutocracy is firmly emplanted and the pee-ons should just accept their fate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s time to admit that the America Class War is long over.  The plutocracy is firmly emplanted and the pee-ons should just accept their fate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jambrytay</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/10/15/the-billionaires-next-door/comment-page-1/#comment-63549</link>
		<dc:creator>jambrytay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 19:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=14597#comment-63549</guid>
		<description>We wring our hands at the ‘sorry shape’ of the middle class, but the hand-wringing isn’t supported by facts. 

Based on a 40+ year study of household income data from the US Census, the losses in numbers of middle class households has been offset by an increase in the number of upper income households (the number of lower income households has held constant).  

Middle class households are becoming upper income households. This is a problem?

http://unrepentantcapitalist.blogspot.com/2010/08/act-one.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We wring our hands at the ‘sorry shape’ of the middle class, but the hand-wringing isn’t supported by facts. </p>
<p>Based on a 40+ year study of household income data from the US Census, the losses in numbers of middle class households has been offset by an increase in the number of upper income households (the number of lower income households has held constant).  </p>
<p>Middle class households are becoming upper income households. This is a problem?</p>
<p><a href='http://unrepentantcapitalist.blogspot.com/2010/08/act-one.html'>http://unrepentantcapitalist.blogspot.co m/2010/08/act-one.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hariknaidu</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/10/15/the-billionaires-next-door/comment-page-1/#comment-63481</link>
		<dc:creator>hariknaidu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 10:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=14597#comment-63481</guid>
		<description>Plutocracy in US is an economic phenomenon. Only in US can such socio-economic divide between rich and poor exist because of socalled *American Exceptionalism*.

What does thgat mean?

It means that unlike in EU, the social economic model is screwed in favour of the rich, and there is little or no fiscal policy baseline to normatively effect progressive redistribution, as economy grows.

Socio-economic divisions eventually lead to social-political conflict between individuals, nations, and business.

We&#039;ve seen it throughtout recent European history - which led to wars between states and eventual creation under Rome Treaty present day EU. 

There is a built-in conflict between the *social market economy* of EU post-industrial model compared to winner -take - it - all American plutocracy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plutocracy in US is an economic phenomenon. Only in US can such socio-economic divide between rich and poor exist because of socalled *American Exceptionalism*.</p>
<p>What does thgat mean?</p>
<p>It means that unlike in EU, the social economic model is screwed in favour of the rich, and there is little or no fiscal policy baseline to normatively effect progressive redistribution, as economy grows.</p>
<p>Socio-economic divisions eventually lead to social-political conflict between individuals, nations, and business.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve seen it throughtout recent European history &#8211; which led to wars between states and eventual creation under Rome Treaty present day EU. </p>
<p>There is a built-in conflict between the *social market economy* of EU post-industrial model compared to winner -take &#8211; it &#8211; all American plutocracy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tannehof</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/10/15/the-billionaires-next-door/comment-page-1/#comment-63470</link>
		<dc:creator>Tannehof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 08:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=14597#comment-63470</guid>
		<description>There is ONE BIG FLAW of the argumentation 
of which the super rich are very well aware 
but the 99% appear not yet to have  realized 
... in EARNEST  ... 
The Superrich are not even 1 % they are may be 0.01 %
of all ... THAT makes their riches VULNERABLE ...
as it would be a PIECE of CAKE 
to EQUALIZE the EQUITATION</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is ONE BIG FLAW of the argumentation<br />
of which the super rich are very well aware<br />
but the 99% appear not yet to have  realized<br />
&#8230; in EARNEST  &#8230;<br />
The Superrich are not even 1 % they are may be 0.01 %<br />
of all &#8230; THAT makes their riches VULNERABLE &#8230;<br />
as it would be a PIECE of CAKE<br />
to EQUALIZE the EQUITATION</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: satori23</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/10/15/the-billionaires-next-door/comment-page-1/#comment-63419</link>
		<dc:creator>satori23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 00:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=14597#comment-63419</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll be brief. We see these developments in cycles. With regards to lessons throughout our history the title of your book should be: 

&#039;Demise of the plutocrats and rise of everyone else&#039;. 

This cycle will end soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll be brief. We see these developments in cycles. With regards to lessons throughout our history the title of your book should be: </p>
<p>&#8216;Demise of the plutocrats and rise of everyone else&#8217;. </p>
<p>This cycle will end soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
