<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why it&#8217;s all about Obama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/10/16/why-its-all-about-obama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/10/16/why-its-all-about-obama/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 14:58:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cattail</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/10/16/why-its-all-about-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-64971</link>
		<dc:creator>cattail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 17:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=14672#comment-64971</guid>
		<description>There is nothing inspiring or concilitioral about Obama. Again Reuters is showing their liberal bias for Obama.  How can you call you liberal rag news and journalism.  Reuter used to be a trusted, upstanding News agency, but not anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is nothing inspiring or concilitioral about Obama. Again Reuters is showing their liberal bias for Obama.  How can you call you liberal rag news and journalism.  Reuter used to be a trusted, upstanding News agency, but not anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
