Comments on: Why ‘peace’ was catchphrase in presidential debate http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/10/23/why-peace-was-catchphrase-in-presidential-debate/ Thu, 21 Jul 2016 07:57:19 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.5 By: Samrch http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/10/23/why-peace-was-catchphrase-in-presidential-debate/#comment-64743 Wed, 24 Oct 2012 00:47:01 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=14931#comment-64743 Romney changed positions when his old one did not suit his elections goal. No one knows what he will do.

]]>
By: Sensibility http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/10/23/why-peace-was-catchphrase-in-presidential-debate/#comment-64742 Tue, 23 Oct 2012 23:27:07 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=14931#comment-64742 Peace was important in the debate because peace is of paramount importance for America, and each of us. No use talking of the economy if we have to dodge bullets. I was impressed with Romney who showed a cool, collected grasp of geopolitical reality and refused to engage Obama in a petty game of “you said this – you said that”.

]]>