Cuban Missile Crisis proved compromise is key

By Graham Allison
October 29, 2012

The most-quoted line from history’s most dangerous confrontation declares, “We were eyeball to eyeball and the other fellow just blinked.” Now, with the opening of Robert F. Kennedy’s personal papers on the 50th anniversary of the Cuban missile crisis, there can be no doubt that before Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev blinked, President John F. Kennedy winked.

In the official narrative, Kennedy stood tall, hung tough and stared his opponent down. What this obscures is the critical role that cunning, craft and willingness to compromise played in resolving this crisis.

This narrative has informed — and misinformed — many presidential decisions over the past five decades. In 1964, for example, while choosing to Americanize the war in Vietnam, President Lyndon B. Johnson said, “It required great American firmness and good sense — first in Berlin and later in the Cuban Missile Crisis — to turn back [Khrushchev's] threats and actions without war.”

More recently, in 2002, before sending U.S. troops to Iraq, President George W. Bush argued: “We cannot wait for the final proof — the smoking gun — that could come in the form of a mushroom cloud. As President Kennedy said in October of 1962…’We no longer live in a world…where only the actual firing of weapons represents a sufficient challenge to a nation’s security to constitute maximum peril.’”

This attitude was echoed by, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in his September address to the United Nations. “President Kennedy set a red line during the Cuban Missile Crisis,” Netanyahu said, “That red line also prevented war and helped preserve the peace for decades.”

Robert F. Kennedy’s personal papers include a number of choice pieces that complete the picture of what happened in the decisive phase of those 13 days, when the U.S. naval blockade imposed by Kennedy several days earlier did not appear to be persuading the Soviets to back down.

Fifty years ago Saturday, on October 27, 1962, Kennedy’s advisers gave the president a stark choice: attack the Soviet missiles in Cuba, to prevent them being able to fire against American cities, or acquiesce to the Soviet Union establishing an offensive nuclear missile base in Cuba.

Kennedy calculated that the attack option could trigger the missile launch against the U.S.  Alternatively, allowing Khrushchev to succeed in such a reckless adventure would likely embolden him to take similar action against Berlin, which he had announced earlier would be resolved in November.  There, Moscow held all the high military cards, and Washington was committed to defending Berlin — even if it meant using nuclear weapons.

So the question arose whether Kennedy could give Khrushchev a way out by accepting his demand that the U.S. withdraw missiles from Turkey.  Thanks to secret tapes made by JFK of the meetings, we can be flies on the wall — listening to men debating choices they believed might lead to quick death for hundreds of millions of people.

From the transcript, it is clear that Kennedy was intrigued in the possibility of trading the obsolete U.S. missiles in Turkey for withdrawal of missiles in Cuba.  But the overwhelming consensus in the room rejected that option, insisting it would undermine the North Atlantic Treaty Organization alliance, a pillar of Washington’s Cold War strategy.

With his advisers stalemated and exhausted, Kennedy dismissed the group for dinner, asking them to come back for further discussion at 9:00 pm. But he retained six of his closest advisers, including his brother, to shape a further option.

This imaginative combination included a public deal, a private ultimatum and a secret sweetener.  Publicly, Washington would pledge not to invade Cuba if the Soviet Union withdrew the missiles.  Privately, the U.S. would state as fact that unless Khrushchev announced withdrawal of the missiles within 24 hours, the U.S. would act to eliminate them.  And secretly, while asserting that the U.S. would not make any deal if the missiles were withdrawn from Cuba, within six months the missiles in Turkey would be gone.

Robert Kennedy met Soviet Ambassador Anatoly Dobrynin during the dinner break.  His papers include a number of drafts in which he explores alternative language for conveying the essence of the president’s message.  Careful not to use the word “ultimatum,” he writes: “The purpose was to emphasize danger.”  Withdrawal of U.S. missiles from Turkey, he insisted, could “not be a quid pro quo,” but if missiles left Cuba, the U.S. would no longer keep missiles in Turkey.

When Dobrynin summarized this agreement in writing the day after, RFK flatly rejected the piece of paper — asserting that he could “have my word on this and that’s sufficient.”

The gambit paid off. Dobrynin got word to Khrushchev, who accepted the deal publicly on Soviet radio so there could be no mistaking his response. And the world took a breath.

As statesmen today attempt to apply lessons from this iconic event to current challenges, from Iran’s nuclear ambition to the rise of China, understanding the complexities and subtleties of what really happened 50 years ago should remind us that success in high-wire statesmanship requires not only strength, but also savvy.


PHOTO: President John F. Kennedy meets with members of the Executive Committee of the National Security Council during the Cuban missile crisis (L-R) Kennedy, Defense Secretary Robert S. McNamara, and Deputy Defense Secretary Roswell Gilpatric. Cabinet Room, White House. 

Credit: Cecil Stoughton/White House Photographs. John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum, Boston


We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see

I’m really loving the theme/design of your web site. Do you ever run into any web browser compatibility issues? A few of my blog visitors have complained about my blog not working correctly in Explorer but looks great in Chrome. Do you have any suggestions to help fix this issue?

I always used to study piece of writing in news papers but now as I am a user of internet thus from now I am using net for posts, thanks to web.|

Wow that was unusual. I just wrote an extremely long comment but after I clicked submit my comment didn’t appear. Grrrr… well I’m not writing all that over again. Anyhow, just wanted to say fantastic blog!

Howdy exceptional website! Does running a blog such as this take a great deal of work? I have no understanding of computer programming however I had been hoping to start my own blog soon. Anyway, if you have any suggestions or techniques for new blog owners please share. I understand this is off topic however I simply needed to ask. Thanks!

Excellent blog! Do you have any tips and hints for aspiring writers? I’m planning to start my own website soon but I’m a little lost on everything. Would you propose starting with a free platform like WordPress or go for a paid option? There are so many options out there that I’m totally confused .. Any recommendations? Many thanks!

I enjoy what you guys tend to be up too. This sort of clever work and exposure! Keep up the awesome works guys I’ve you guys to my blogroll.

Greetings from Colorado! I’m bored to tears at work so I decided to check out your blog on my iphone during lunch break. I enjoy the knowledge you present here and can’t wait to take a look when I get home. I’m amazed at how quick your blog loaded on my phone .. I’m not even using WIFI, just 3G .. Anyways, superb blog!

I am really enjoying the theme/design of your blog. Do you ever run into any web browser compatibility problems? A few of my blog audience have complained about my website not working correctly in Explorer but looks great in Safari. Do you have any recommendations to help fix this problem?

Howdy! This is my first visit to your blog! We are a collection of volunteers and starting a new initiative in a community in the same niche. Your blog provided us useful information to work on. You have done a wonderful job!

I could not refrain from commenting. Exceptionally well written!

What’s up, everything is going sound here and ofcourse every one is sharing facts, that’s really fine, keep up writing.|

Howdy! I know this is kinda off topic but I was wondering if you knew where I could get a captcha plugin for my comment form? I’m using the same blog platform as yours and I’m having difficulty finding one? Thanks a lot!

This page really has all of the info I needed concerning this subject and didn’t know who to ask.

There’s definately a great deal to learn about this subject. I really like all the points you have made.

When I originally commented I clicked the “Notify me when new comments are added” checkbox and now each time a comment is added I get four e-mails with the same comment. Is there any way you can remove people from that service? Cheers!

I just could not leave your web site before suggesting that I really loved the standard info a person provide in your guests? Is gonna be again often in order to investigate cross-check new posts|

Why people still make use of to read news papers when in this technological world the whole thing is presented on net?|