Comments on: Re-thinking U.S.-China relations http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/11/19/re-thinking-u-s-china-relations/ Thu, 21 Jul 2016 07:57:19 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.5 By: wcheong http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/11/19/re-thinking-u-s-china-relations/#comment-71385 Fri, 08 Mar 2013 13:18:27 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=15639#comment-71385 US must clearly understand that from the righteous, civilized and historical points of view, China has never been their true enemy. China is only their conceived enemy. Differences always exist even among any family’s members and between couples therefore it is only natural for US and China to have differences. It would be abnormal if there are no differences. Thus differences should not be the cause for preventing US and China to establish true cordial relationship and friendly competition in all fields in order to co-operatively upgrade the standard of all kinds of technologies. In fact US’s true enemies come from two major countries, one is Japan and the other is a hidden one. Whether US admits it or not, the hidden danger will forever exist. Therefore for their long term security and for preventing their people from facing the constant nightmares in future, they should now amend their policy and take steps to get rid of these two countries before it is too late. Japan is the most aggressive monster country. Their Prime Minister even dared to declare in front of President Obama in US territory recently that Japan is back and that they would never want to be No 2. His meaning is obvious and that is to challenge US’s position. Their ambition is so great that any negligence on the part of the US’s government would bring great havoc to the US people. US should plan to carry out preemptive strikes against all the Japanese major cities using nuclear weapons from their near-by air craft carrier so that it gives no time for the Japanese even to response. For doing so, Japan would not blame US because US just correctly learn from them.

]]>
By: wcheong http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/11/19/re-thinking-u-s-china-relations/#comment-71384 Fri, 08 Mar 2013 13:17:18 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=15639#comment-71384 China and US should have cordial relationsip for mutual benefits

]]>
By: EthicsIntl http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/11/19/re-thinking-u-s-china-relations/#comment-67213 Wed, 21 Nov 2012 11:32:14 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=15639#comment-67213 As always, the one with the big bucks rules……..
Surprised ? It is China’s century.

]]>
By: brotherkenny4 http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/11/19/re-thinking-u-s-china-relations/#comment-67196 Tue, 20 Nov 2012 16:43:25 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=15639#comment-67196 Well yes, the governments, but it’s real about the wealth of industry and the old money. As is everything else. Sure the governments are good at giving the impression of control, but they get orders from the real bosses.

]]>
By: Donquixote2u http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/11/19/re-thinking-u-s-china-relations/#comment-67177 Tue, 20 Nov 2012 00:12:35 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=15639#comment-67177 synopsis: The US and China should play nice.

what a load of old waffle.

]]>
By: LysanderTucker http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/11/19/re-thinking-u-s-china-relations/#comment-67163 Mon, 19 Nov 2012 21:05:11 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=15639#comment-67163 It’s too bad the Chinese and Americans have those pesky governments standing between them and their ability to trade freely with one another. I’m no more suspicious of any Chinese citizen then they are of me on an individual or economic level.

]]>
By: UauS http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/11/19/re-thinking-u-s-china-relations/#comment-67162 Mon, 19 Nov 2012 20:34:36 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=15639#comment-67162 anything on such a ‘secondary’ issue as US jobs and technology outsourcing to China?.. :)

]]>