<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The perils of cliff-diving</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/12/05/the-perils-of-cliff-diving/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/12/05/the-perils-of-cliff-diving/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 19:36:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bjbouch</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/12/05/the-perils-of-cliff-diving/comment-page-1/#comment-69459</link>
		<dc:creator>bjbouch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 23:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=16044#comment-69459</guid>
		<description>Add a federal consumption tax (sales tax) for all goods and services except groceries, medicine, healthcare, and education. Then its governments job to spend within its means (yearly revenue)

In no terms should a deal be struck that continues to speed more than revenue can support. 17 trillion is enough debt. According to us census our national debt is higher than the value of all the land of the combined 50 states.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Add a federal consumption tax (sales tax) for all goods and services except groceries, medicine, healthcare, and education. Then its governments job to spend within its means (yearly revenue)</p>
<p>In no terms should a deal be struck that continues to speed more than revenue can support. 17 trillion is enough debt. According to us census our national debt is higher than the value of all the land of the combined 50 states.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Acetracy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/12/05/the-perils-of-cliff-diving/comment-page-1/#comment-68724</link>
		<dc:creator>Acetracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2012 17:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=16044#comment-68724</guid>
		<description>Holtz-Eakin comparison of the so called &quot;fiscal cliff&quot; to the passage of TARP in 2008 is a clear example of the hysteria the far right is creating in order to bully through another two years of tax breaks for the super rich.  

Most tax discussions only center around W-2 forms of income (where you get paid for actually working 8 to 10 hours a day).  Any the highest tax bracket on W-2 income stops at $380K which throws a 2 income family often in the same tax bracket is a chief executive making $10s of millions.  Plus W-2 income pays Social Security tax, Medicare Tax, etc. (though there is the $100K limit on Social Security wages - again a big break for upper, upper income).

What is missing in these discussions is the immensely low tax rate on unearned income:  capital gains, dividends, real estate 1038 exchanges, oil/gas partnerships and other K-1 and 1099 forms of income.  Much of K-1 dividends paid out are not taxed at all because they are considered under our archaic tax code a &quot;return of capital&quot;.  15% tax rate on long term gains is only marginally lower than the 28% top rate on short term capital gains (investment held under one year - often just for a couple of hours).  These 1099, 1098, K-1 incomes don&#039;t pay into social security or medicare and can offset these gain in myriad of ways to reduce even the 15% tax rate.  This is where the super rich are reaping such a huge % of the nation&#039;s wealth and income.  And the low, low rate on short term gains has been a huge benefit to speculators that has led to the boom/bust markets we have today.

Going back to the pre-Bush tax code is a step in the right direction, and having an automatic cut of $50billion in the Defense budget is certainly a HUGE step in curtailing that big waste of money.

Obama and the Democrats should nut feel bullied and rushed into a tax compromise with the Norquist puppets in the House and Senate.  It will take months and months of hard work to come up with a new tax structure that actually makes sense.  From higher rates on 7-digit W-2 income, elimination of salary caps on social security, cap on low 15% dividend income (maybe 15% on just the first $50K then to marginal income tax rate), and finally 50% to 80% tax rates on short term capital gains.  We need to eliminate all preferential rates to real estate, oil &amp; gas structures, off-shore income, etc.  

And let&#039;s take $50billion in the Defense Budget and pay off some of our debt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holtz-Eakin comparison of the so called &#8220;fiscal cliff&#8221; to the passage of TARP in 2008 is a clear example of the hysteria the far right is creating in order to bully through another two years of tax breaks for the super rich.  </p>
<p>Most tax discussions only center around W-2 forms of income (where you get paid for actually working 8 to 10 hours a day).  Any the highest tax bracket on W-2 income stops at $380K which throws a 2 income family often in the same tax bracket is a chief executive making $10s of millions.  Plus W-2 income pays Social Security tax, Medicare Tax, etc. (though there is the $100K limit on Social Security wages &#8211; again a big break for upper, upper income).</p>
<p>What is missing in these discussions is the immensely low tax rate on unearned income:  capital gains, dividends, real estate 1038 exchanges, oil/gas partnerships and other K-1 and 1099 forms of income.  Much of K-1 dividends paid out are not taxed at all because they are considered under our archaic tax code a &#8220;return of capital&#8221;.  15% tax rate on long term gains is only marginally lower than the 28% top rate on short term capital gains (investment held under one year &#8211; often just for a couple of hours).  These 1099, 1098, K-1 incomes don&#8217;t pay into social security or medicare and can offset these gain in myriad of ways to reduce even the 15% tax rate.  This is where the super rich are reaping such a huge % of the nation&#8217;s wealth and income.  And the low, low rate on short term gains has been a huge benefit to speculators that has led to the boom/bust markets we have today.</p>
<p>Going back to the pre-Bush tax code is a step in the right direction, and having an automatic cut of $50billion in the Defense budget is certainly a HUGE step in curtailing that big waste of money.</p>
<p>Obama and the Democrats should nut feel bullied and rushed into a tax compromise with the Norquist puppets in the House and Senate.  It will take months and months of hard work to come up with a new tax structure that actually makes sense.  From higher rates on 7-digit W-2 income, elimination of salary caps on social security, cap on low 15% dividend income (maybe 15% on just the first $50K then to marginal income tax rate), and finally 50% to 80% tax rates on short term capital gains.  We need to eliminate all preferential rates to real estate, oil &#038; gas structures, off-shore income, etc.  </p>
<p>And let&#8217;s take $50billion in the Defense Budget and pay off some of our debt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Acetracy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/12/05/the-perils-of-cliff-diving/comment-page-1/#comment-68723</link>
		<dc:creator>Acetracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2012 17:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=16044#comment-68723</guid>
		<description>Holtz-Eakin comparison of the so called &quot;fiscal cliff&quot; to the passage of TARP in 2008 is a clear example of the hysteria the far right is creating in order to bully through another two years of tax breaks for the super rich.  

Most tax discussions only center around W-2 forms of income (where you get paid for actually working 8 to 10 hours a day).  Any the highest tax bracket on W-2 income stops at $380K which throws a 2 income family often in the same tax bracket is a chief executive making $10s of millions.  Plus W-2 income pays Social Security tax, Medicare Tax, etc. (though there is the $100K limit on Social Security wages - again a big break for upper, upper income).

What is missing in these discussions is the immensely low tax rate on unearned income:  capital gains, dividends, real estate 1038 exchanges, oil/gas partnerships and other K-1 and 1099 forms of income.  Much of K-1 dividends paid out are not taxed at all because they are considered under our archaic tax code a &quot;return of capital&quot;.  15% tax rate on long term gains is only marginally lower than the 28% top rate on short term capital gains (investment held under one year - often just for a couple of hours).  These 1099, 1098, K-1 incomes don&#039;t pay into social security or medicare and can offset these gain in myriad of ways to reduce even the 15% tax rate.  This is where the super rich are reaping such a huge % of the nation&#039;s wealth and income.  And the low, low rate on short term gains has been a huge benefit to speculators that has led to the boom/bust markets we have today.

Going back to the pre-Bush tax code is a step in the right direction, and having an automatic cut of $50billion in the Defense budget is certainly a HUGE step in curtailing that big waste of money.

Obama and the Democrats should nut feel bullied and rushed into a tax compromise with the Norquist puppets in the House and Senate.  It will take months and months of hard work to come up with a new tax structure that actually makes sense.  From higher rates on 7-digit W-2 income, elimination of salary caps on social security, cap on low 15% dividend income (maybe 15% on just the first $50K then to marginal income tax rate), and finally 50% to 80% tax rates on short term capital gains.  We need to eliminate all preferential rates to real estate, oil &amp; gas structures, off-shore income, etc.  

And let&#039;s take $50billion in the Defense Budget and pay off some of our debt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holtz-Eakin comparison of the so called &#8220;fiscal cliff&#8221; to the passage of TARP in 2008 is a clear example of the hysteria the far right is creating in order to bully through another two years of tax breaks for the super rich.  </p>
<p>Most tax discussions only center around W-2 forms of income (where you get paid for actually working 8 to 10 hours a day).  Any the highest tax bracket on W-2 income stops at $380K which throws a 2 income family often in the same tax bracket is a chief executive making $10s of millions.  Plus W-2 income pays Social Security tax, Medicare Tax, etc. (though there is the $100K limit on Social Security wages &#8211; again a big break for upper, upper income).</p>
<p>What is missing in these discussions is the immensely low tax rate on unearned income:  capital gains, dividends, real estate 1038 exchanges, oil/gas partnerships and other K-1 and 1099 forms of income.  Much of K-1 dividends paid out are not taxed at all because they are considered under our archaic tax code a &#8220;return of capital&#8221;.  15% tax rate on long term gains is only marginally lower than the 28% top rate on short term capital gains (investment held under one year &#8211; often just for a couple of hours).  These 1099, 1098, K-1 incomes don&#8217;t pay into social security or medicare and can offset these gain in myriad of ways to reduce even the 15% tax rate.  This is where the super rich are reaping such a huge % of the nation&#8217;s wealth and income.  And the low, low rate on short term gains has been a huge benefit to speculators that has led to the boom/bust markets we have today.</p>
<p>Going back to the pre-Bush tax code is a step in the right direction, and having an automatic cut of $50billion in the Defense budget is certainly a HUGE step in curtailing that big waste of money.</p>
<p>Obama and the Democrats should nut feel bullied and rushed into a tax compromise with the Norquist puppets in the House and Senate.  It will take months and months of hard work to come up with a new tax structure that actually makes sense.  From higher rates on 7-digit W-2 income, elimination of salary caps on social security, cap on low 15% dividend income (maybe 15% on just the first $50K then to marginal income tax rate), and finally 50% to 80% tax rates on short term capital gains.  We need to eliminate all preferential rates to real estate, oil &#038; gas structures, off-shore income, etc.  </p>
<p>And let&#8217;s take $50billion in the Defense Budget and pay off some of our debt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matthewslyman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/12/05/the-perils-of-cliff-diving/comment-page-1/#comment-68637</link>
		<dc:creator>matthewslyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 21:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=16044#comment-68637</guid>
		<description>@Samrch: Seconded — your comment is worth further consideration.

@Gordon2352: We&#039;re more likely to persuade the wealthy (or, those wealthy people who are not yet persuaded, though many of them have been); if we start speaking about the 100%, rather than attempting to force their hand with divisive politics with talk of the 99% or whatever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Samrch: Seconded — your comment is worth further consideration.</p>
<p>@Gordon2352: We&#8217;re more likely to persuade the wealthy (or, those wealthy people who are not yet persuaded, though many of them have been); if we start speaking about the 100%, rather than attempting to force their hand with divisive politics with talk of the 99% or whatever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: megan759</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/12/05/the-perils-of-cliff-diving/comment-page-1/#comment-68393</link>
		<dc:creator>megan759</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 09:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=16044#comment-68393</guid>
		<description>Consider the real “cliff” issues. Congress has more than just money problems. Going over the cliff is just an excuse for fiscal policy gridlock. Where is the accountability for our Government&#039;s &quot;police state&quot; foreign policy ? Why are we contributing billions in &quot;foreign&quot; affairs that have NOTHING to do with our &quot;national&quot; health ? So now the president wants to make the rich &quot;pay&quot; their &quot;fair&quot; share ? The rich will do what they always do. Divest in legitimate opportunities and invest in the unfortunate business&#039;s that crash due to this temporary fiscal cliff reform. Financial investment has long been the framework for Americas economic growth. &quot;The cliff&quot; will just move Investors to invest their money from legitimate ROI investing to short term cliff losers who are good for the quick buck to make up the additional taxes that will be levied on their already “meager” portfolios. This does not motivate legitimate investment growth in our economy. It sounds like America is for sale, again, at the peoples&#039; expense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consider the real “cliff” issues. Congress has more than just money problems. Going over the cliff is just an excuse for fiscal policy gridlock. Where is the accountability for our Government&#8217;s &#8220;police state&#8221; foreign policy ? Why are we contributing billions in &#8220;foreign&#8221; affairs that have NOTHING to do with our &#8220;national&#8221; health ? So now the president wants to make the rich &#8220;pay&#8221; their &#8220;fair&#8221; share ? The rich will do what they always do. Divest in legitimate opportunities and invest in the unfortunate business&#8217;s that crash due to this temporary fiscal cliff reform. Financial investment has long been the framework for Americas economic growth. &#8220;The cliff&#8221; will just move Investors to invest their money from legitimate ROI investing to short term cliff losers who are good for the quick buck to make up the additional taxes that will be levied on their already “meager” portfolios. This does not motivate legitimate investment growth in our economy. It sounds like America is for sale, again, at the peoples&#8217; expense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samrch</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/12/05/the-perils-of-cliff-diving/comment-page-1/#comment-68323</link>
		<dc:creator>Samrch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 01:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=16044#comment-68323</guid>
		<description>Tea party in the recent past coursed grid lock in some state  budgets and in one case I know it lasted for some time.  The US tried austerity at first during the great depression. 

As long as unemployment is high it is not the time to worry about bond holders.   But should try to fix structural problems.  Such as failed trade policies (at lest they have not worked for good of the greatest number of Americans).  Paying more for education and health care than most nations but getting less results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tea party in the recent past coursed grid lock in some state  budgets and in one case I know it lasted for some time.  The US tried austerity at first during the great depression. </p>
<p>As long as unemployment is high it is not the time to worry about bond holders.   But should try to fix structural problems.  Such as failed trade policies (at lest they have not worked for good of the greatest number of Americans).  Paying more for education and health care than most nations but getting less results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MJamison</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/12/05/the-perils-of-cliff-diving/comment-page-1/#comment-68322</link>
		<dc:creator>MJamison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 00:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=16044#comment-68322</guid>
		<description>Yes and with programmed and HFT trading the market can drop several hundred points and rebound within hours for no apparent reason. This is another argument that relies on the confidence fairies and a set of myths that never seem to play out in the real world.
The fiscal cliff is pretty much imaginary, most of what will happen on January 1 can be addressed with subsequent legislation so the impacts are relatively short term. The markets will likely take into account what negotiations are taking place rather than assuming that the sky is falling.
It is rather ironic to see the folks who brought a real though totally unnecessary crisis to bear with haggling over the debt ceiling, a ridiculous and outmoded idea in itself, now concerned about another so called crisis. I though Mr. Holtz-Eakin was supposed to be a serious economist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes and with programmed and HFT trading the market can drop several hundred points and rebound within hours for no apparent reason. This is another argument that relies on the confidence fairies and a set of myths that never seem to play out in the real world.<br />
The fiscal cliff is pretty much imaginary, most of what will happen on January 1 can be addressed with subsequent legislation so the impacts are relatively short term. The markets will likely take into account what negotiations are taking place rather than assuming that the sky is falling.<br />
It is rather ironic to see the folks who brought a real though totally unnecessary crisis to bear with haggling over the debt ceiling, a ridiculous and outmoded idea in itself, now concerned about another so called crisis. I though Mr. Holtz-Eakin was supposed to be a serious economist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: borisjimbo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/12/05/the-perils-of-cliff-diving/comment-page-1/#comment-68321</link>
		<dc:creator>borisjimbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 23:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=16044#comment-68321</guid>
		<description>Retroactive legislation may not unwind any current problems but they&#039;d likely prevent future ones.  I&#039;d think an economist with even the vaguest notions of Great Depression reforms to the banking system would know this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Retroactive legislation may not unwind any current problems but they&#8217;d likely prevent future ones.  I&#8217;d think an economist with even the vaguest notions of Great Depression reforms to the banking system would know this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon2352</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/12/05/the-perils-of-cliff-diving/comment-page-1/#comment-68311</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon2352</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 15:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=16044#comment-68311</guid>
		<description>Let me rephrase one sentence to straigten out the numerous errors in your propaganda article.  

&quot;Congress and the president should increase taxes on the wealthy, which have caused all of this because of their unmitigated greed, and force them to pay their fair share – beginning next year.&quot;

Without more revenue coming in, the US economy WILL certainly crash.

This is not a debt issue. It is a shortfall in revenue issue, which is caused solely by the wealthy refusing to pay their fair share in taxes.

It&#039;s not rocket science, if people like you would begin to tell the truth.

It&#039;s also not economics.

It&#039;s old-fashioned greed by the wealthy class who care about nothing but themselves and maintaining ther egregious lifestyles at the expene of everyone else.

THAT is what must be reversed, no matter what it takes, for the sake of this nation and the American people.

And, no, I do not include the wealthy class as being part of the American people any longer.

They must be made to pay for what they have done to this country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me rephrase one sentence to straigten out the numerous errors in your propaganda article.  </p>
<p>&#8220;Congress and the president should increase taxes on the wealthy, which have caused all of this because of their unmitigated greed, and force them to pay their fair share – beginning next year.&#8221;</p>
<p>Without more revenue coming in, the US economy WILL certainly crash.</p>
<p>This is not a debt issue. It is a shortfall in revenue issue, which is caused solely by the wealthy refusing to pay their fair share in taxes.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not rocket science, if people like you would begin to tell the truth.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also not economics.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s old-fashioned greed by the wealthy class who care about nothing but themselves and maintaining ther egregious lifestyles at the expene of everyone else.</p>
<p>THAT is what must be reversed, no matter what it takes, for the sake of this nation and the American people.</p>
<p>And, no, I do not include the wealthy class as being part of the American people any longer.</p>
<p>They must be made to pay for what they have done to this country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
