Of states and heath insurance exchanges

By Michael F. Cannon
December 18, 2012

Reuters reports [“No sign Congress meant to limit health exchange subsidy: CBO,” Dec. 6] that a recent Congressional Budget Office letter “could complicate” efforts to stop the Internal Revenue Service from imposing “Obamacare’s” employer mandate in states that refuse to implement a health insurance “exchange.”

In fact, the CBO’s letter devastates the IRS’s already weak case.

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act imposes a $2,000-per-worker charge on employers only if one of their employees receives a “premium assistance tax credit,” and the act authorizes those credits only if states create their own exchanges.

If a state opts instead for a federal exchange, as more than 30 states have, the IRS has zero authority to penalize employers there. “As even some health law supporters concede,” Kaiser Health News reports, “the claim that Congress denied to the federal exchanges the power to distribute tax credits and subsidies seems correct as a literal reading of the most relevant provisions.”

Yet the IRS is attempting to issue those tax credits — and penalize employers — where it has no authority to do so. Oklahoma’s attorney general has filed suit to protect its employers from this illegal tax.

The IRS says it is carrying out congressional intent — a curious claim from an agency violating the express language of a duly enacted statute. The only piece of legislative history the IRS has offered to support its action is the CBO’s cost projections of the bill. The CBO predicted there would be tax credits issued in all states.

That does not, however, establish congressional intent to offer tax credits in federal exchanges, much less statutory authority to do so. The CBO was merely assuming, as most everyone did in 2009, that all states would establish their own exchanges.

To support its argument, the IRS would need the CBO to say it based those projections on assurances it received from the bill’s authors, or its own analysis, that tax credits would be available through federal exchanges. Yet the CBO said no such thing.

Instead, its Dec. 6 letter acknowledges that CBO analysts “did not perform a separate legislative analysis of that issue.” When projecting the cost of the Senate bill that ultimately became Obamacare, the CBO merely “anticipated … that the tax credits would be available in every state.” Just as they did with the bill that came from the House of Representatives, despite the very different language in the two bills.

That is devastating to the IRS case. Before this letter, the CBO’s projections offered no support to the IRS, because they merely reflected the assumption that all states would establish exchanges. Now the CBO has admitted that it didn’t read the bill closely enough to notice the law doesn’t authorize credits through federal exchanges.

Critics of the IRS have produced lots of legislative history indicating the statute’s language reflects congressional intent. The IRS never had the law on its side. Now it has nothing to support its theory of congressional intent.

If that “complicates” efforts to stop the IRS from imposing illegal taxes on employers, please let’s have more complications.

PHOTO: Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt   Credit: Handout


We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/

I’m usually to running a blog and i really admire your content. The article has actually peaks my interest. I’m going to bookmark your site and keep checking for brand new information.

I’m impressed, I must say. Actually hardly ever do I encounter a blog that’s each educative and entertaining, and let me let you know, you could have hit the nail on the head. Your concept is outstanding; the difficulty is something that not sufficient persons are talking intelligently about. I’m very comfortable that I stumbled across this in my seek for one thing relating to this.

Simply desire to say your article is as surprising. The clarity in your post is simply spectacular and i could assume you are an expert on this subject. Fine with your permission allow me to grab your RSS feed to keep up to date with forthcoming post. Thanks a million and please keep up the rewarding work.|

Greetings from Idaho! I’m bored to tears at work so I decided to browse your blog on my iphone during lunch break. I really like the knowledge you present here and can’t wait to take a look when I get home. I’m surprised at how fast your blog loaded on my mobile .. I’m not even using WIFI, just 3G .. Anyways, amazing site!|

You have made some really good points there. I looked on the internet to learn more about the issue and found most people will go along with your views on this web site.|

I am sure this article has touched all the internet users, its really really nice article on building up new website.|

Amazing! Its in fact remarkable piece of writing, I have got much clear idea on the topic of from this piece of writing.|

Thanks extremely handy. Will certainly share site with my friends.|

Every weekend i used to pay a quick visit this web site, for the reason that i want enjoyment, since this this web site conations actually fastidious funny material too.|

Hi there to all, the contents existing at this web site are truly awesome for people knowledge, well, keep up the good work fellows.|

I enjoy, cause I discovered just what I was taking a look for. You’ve ended my 4 day lengthy hunt! God Bless you man. Have a great day. Bye|

Every weekend i used to pay a quick visit this site, because i wish for enjoyment, for the reason that this this website conations genuinely nice funny material too.|

I’m impressed, I must say. Seldom do I encounter a blog that’s both educative and amusing, and without a doubt, you have hit the nail on the head. The issue is an issue that not enough people are speaking intelligently about. Now i’m very happy I stumbled across this in my hunt for something concerning this.|

Spot on with this write-up, I really feel this amazing site needs a great deal more attention. I’ll probably be returning to read more, thanks for the advice!|

I know this if off topic but I’m looking into starting my own weblog and was curious what all is needed to get setup? I’m assuming having a blog like yours would cost a pretty penny? I’m not very internet savvy so I’m not 100% certain. Any suggestions or advice would be greatly appreciated. Many thanks|

Hey there! I know this is kinda off topic but I was wondering which blog platform are you using for this website? I’m getting tired of WordPress because I’ve had problems with hackers and I’m looking at options for another platform. I would be fantastic if you could point me in the direction of a good platform.|

I know this if off topic but I’m looking into starting my own weblog and was curious what all is needed to get set up? I’m assuming having a blog like yours would cost a pretty penny? I’m not very web smart so I’m not 100% sure. Any recommendations or advice would be greatly appreciated. Many thanks|

I visited many blogs but the audio feature for audio songs current at this site is really fabulous.|

Hi there, its pleasant paragraph concerning media print, we all be familiar with media is a great source of facts.|