<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lance Armstrong is world-class – at capturing regulators</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2013/01/24/lance-armstrong-is-world-class-at-capturing-regulators/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2013/01/24/lance-armstrong-is-world-class-at-capturing-regulators/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 08:24:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Azza9</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2013/01/24/lance-armstrong-is-world-class-at-capturing-regulators/comment-page-1/#comment-70353</link>
		<dc:creator>Azza9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 04:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=17345#comment-70353</guid>
		<description>Who would have thought the humble cycle would be a front for a sophisticated organized crime syndicate. lol.

I&#039;m starting to wonder if he even had cancer... That it was some sort of PR ploy to deter would be inquirers from pressing too hard. Also he could have used it as an excuse for hormonal based doping (A card he didn&#039;t use but it would have been up his sleeve).

But no. Ill dismiss that conspiracy fiction, I don&#039;t look very dashing in a tinfoil knob hat anyway...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who would have thought the humble cycle would be a front for a sophisticated organized crime syndicate. lol.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m starting to wonder if he even had cancer&#8230; That it was some sort of PR ploy to deter would be inquirers from pressing too hard. Also he could have used it as an excuse for hormonal based doping (A card he didn&#8217;t use but it would have been up his sleeve).</p>
<p>But no. Ill dismiss that conspiracy fiction, I don&#8217;t look very dashing in a tinfoil knob hat anyway&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dkgm</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2013/01/24/lance-armstrong-is-world-class-at-capturing-regulators/comment-page-1/#comment-70350</link>
		<dc:creator>dkgm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 19:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=17345#comment-70350</guid>
		<description>EXCELLENT and WELCOME commentary!  
Your insights aptly shed light on another dimension of endurance sports that needs to be fixed before they can &quot;truly&quot; be cleaned up and honestly be called “sports” again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EXCELLENT and WELCOME commentary!<br />
Your insights aptly shed light on another dimension of endurance sports that needs to be fixed before they can &#8220;truly&#8221; be cleaned up and honestly be called “sports” again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: js2012</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2013/01/24/lance-armstrong-is-world-class-at-capturing-regulators/comment-page-1/#comment-70349</link>
		<dc:creator>js2012</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 19:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=17345#comment-70349</guid>
		<description>Lance is done. Let it go. They were all in the game together. Cycling is a difficult sport, in terms of human stamina.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lance is done. Let it go. They were all in the game together. Cycling is a difficult sport, in terms of human stamina.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ofilha</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2013/01/24/lance-armstrong-is-world-class-at-capturing-regulators/comment-page-1/#comment-70348</link>
		<dc:creator>ofilha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 18:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=17345#comment-70348</guid>
		<description>this whole sports industry should disappear. It&#039;s all about money and corruption.  It&#039;s sickening how these individuals and their sycophants do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this whole sports industry should disappear. It&#8217;s all about money and corruption.  It&#8217;s sickening how these individuals and their sycophants do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LaJollan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2013/01/24/lance-armstrong-is-world-class-at-capturing-regulators/comment-page-1/#comment-70347</link>
		<dc:creator>LaJollan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 16:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=17345#comment-70347</guid>
		<description>&quot;Tygart alleges Armstrong offered USADA $250,000 in 2004 to drop the charges against him. &quot;

This is inaccurate.  It&#039;s not what Tygart said.  Armstrong was not facing any charges in 2004.  Tygart did say that an offer of a donation to the USADA was made by an Armstrong representative, and this was confirmed by a now retired USADA official, but there was no overt discussion about it being for anything, much less to drop charges that were not there.

I think the rest of the article is good, but misstatements like this put the veracity of the whole piece in question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Tygart alleges Armstrong offered USADA $250,000 in 2004 to drop the charges against him. &#8221;</p>
<p>This is inaccurate.  It&#8217;s not what Tygart said.  Armstrong was not facing any charges in 2004.  Tygart did say that an offer of a donation to the USADA was made by an Armstrong representative, and this was confirmed by a now retired USADA official, but there was no overt discussion about it being for anything, much less to drop charges that were not there.</p>
<p>I think the rest of the article is good, but misstatements like this put the veracity of the whole piece in question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
