http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2013/01/30/the-next-voting-rights-act/ Fri, 24 May 2013 19:36:13 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2 http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2013/01/30/the-next-voting-rights-act/comment-page-1/#comment-70694 MrsCrashSmith Thu, 07 Feb 2013 14:29:16 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=17433#comment-70694 There is nothing wrong with requiring someone to show an ID to vote. In order to vote you must be a Citizen of the United States. There are no exceptions. There is nothing wrong with requiring someone to show an ID to vote. In order to vote you must be a Citizen of the United States. There are no exceptions.

]]> http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2013/01/30/the-next-voting-rights-act/comment-page-1/#comment-70505 RogerClegg Thu, 31 Jan 2013 16:59:12 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=17433#comment-70505 Here's why Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act is bad policy, outdated, unconstitutional, and ought to be struck down by the Supreme Court: http://www.pacificlegal.org/opeds/Overturn-unconstitutional-Voting-Rights-Act Here’s why Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act is bad policy, outdated, unconstitutional, and ought to be struck down by the Supreme Court: http://www.pacificlegal.org/opeds/Overtu rn-unconstitutional-Voting-Rights-Act

]]>