Comments on: Responding to North Korea http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2013/02/15/responding-to-north-korea/ Thu, 21 Jul 2016 07:57:19 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.5 By: Lowell_Thinks http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2013/02/15/responding-to-north-korea/#comment-70840 Fri, 15 Feb 2013 23:23:00 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=18019#comment-70840 We should just ignore them? Kind of like what we did with Hitler in 1939?

]]>
By: KyleDexter http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2013/02/15/responding-to-north-korea/#comment-70828 Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:59:33 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=18019#comment-70828 @tmc, spot on!

]]>
By: tmc http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2013/02/15/responding-to-north-korea/#comment-70827 Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:13:58 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=18019#comment-70827 Perhaps North Korea is just a honey pot for the US Military industrial complex? By using N. Korea, the Chinese do not need to waste excessive resources on defense and be drawn into another cold war. That would be a dream come true for the complex. Instead, N. Korea is the Military threat and it’s cheap to operate, conveniently located and seems to be working wonderfully.
I think we should just ignore it. But we won’t. We will spend gazillions of dollars we don’t have to build more weapons that we don’t need to prevail against a threat that isn’t real. While China and India take over the global economy from us.

]]>