Why Scandinavian women make the rest of the world jealous

By Lynn Stuart Parramore
October 31, 2013

Icelanders are among the happiest and healthiest people on Earth. They publish more books per capita than any other country, and they have more artists. They boast the most prevalent belief in evolution — and elves, too. Iceland is the world’s most peaceful nation (the cops don’t even carry guns), and the best place for kids. Oh, and they had a lesbian head of state, the world’s first. Granted, the national dish is putrefied shark meat, but you can’t have everything.

Iceland is also the best place to have a uterus, according to the folks at the World Economic Forum. The Global Gender Gap Report ranks countries based on where women have the most equal access to education and healthcare, and where they can participate most fully in the country’s political and economic life.

According to the 2013 report, Icelandic women pretty much have it all. Their sisters in Finland, Norway, and Sweden have it pretty good, too: those countries came in second, third and fourth, respectively. Denmark is not far behind at number seven.

The U.S. comes in at a dismal 23rd, which is a notch down from last year. At least we’re not Yemen, which is dead last out of 136 countries.

So how did a string of countries settled by Vikings become leaders in gender enlightenment? Bloodthirsty raiding parties don’t exactly sound like models of egalitarianism, and the early days weren’t pretty. Medieval Icelandic law prohibited women from bearing arms or even having short hair. Viking women could not be chiefs or judges, and they had to remain silent in assemblies. On the flip side, they could request a divorce and inherit property. But that’s not quite a blueprint for the world’s premier egalitarian society.

The change came with literacy, for one thing. Today almost everybody in Scandinavia can read, a legacy of the Reformation and early Christian missionaries, who were interested in teaching all citizens to read the Bible. Following a long period of turmoil, Nordic states also turned to literacy as a stabilizing force in the late 18th century. By 1842, Sweden had made education compulsory for both boys and girls.

Researchers have found that the more literate the society in general, the more egalitarian it is likely to be, and vice versa. But the literacy rate is very high in the U.S., too, so there must be something else going on in Scandinavia. Turns out that a whole smorgasbord of ingredients makes gender equality a high priority in Nordic countries.

To understand why, let’s take a look at religion. The Scandinavian Lutherans, who turned away from the excesses of the medieval Catholic Church, were concerned about equality — especially the disparity between rich and poor. They thought that individuals had some inherent rights that could not just be bestowed by the powerful, and this may have opened them to the idea of rights for women. Lutheran state churches in Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Norway and Iceland have had female priests since the middle of the 20th century, and today, the Swedish Lutheran Church even has a female archbishop.

Or maybe it’s just that there’s not much religion at all. Scandinavians aren’t big churchgoers. They tend to look at morality from a secular point of view, where there’s not so much obsessive focus on sexual issues and less interest in controlling women’s behavior and activities. Scandinavia’s secularism decoupled sex from sin, and this worked out well for females. They came to be seen as having the right to sexual experience just like men, and reproductive freedom, too. Girls and boys learn about contraception in school (and even the pleasure of orgasms), and most cities have youth clinics where contraceptives are readily available. Women may have an abortion for any reason up to the eighteenth week (they can seek permission from the National Board of Health and Welfare after that), and the issue is not politically controversial.

Scandinavia’s political economy also developed along somewhat different lines than America’s did. Sweden and Norway had some big imperialist adventures, but this behavior declined following the Napoleonic Wars. After that they invested in the military to ward off invaders, but they were less interested in building it up to deal with bloated colonial structures and foreign adventures. Overall Nordic countries devoted fewer resources to the military — the arena where patriarchal values tend to get emphasized and entrenched. Iceland, for example, spends the world’s lowest percentage of GDP on its military.

Industrialization is part of the story, too: it hit the Nordic countries late. In the 19th century, Scandinavia did have a rich and powerful merchant class, but the region never produced the Gilded Age industrial titans and extreme concentration of wealth that happened in America back then, and has returned today. (Income inequality and discrimination of all kinds seem to go hand-in-hand.)

In the 20th century, farmers and workers in the newly populated Nordic cities tended to join together in political coalitions, and they could mount a serious challenge to the business elites, who were relatively weak compared to those in the U.S. Like ordinary people everywhere, Scandinavians wanted a social and economic system where everyone could get a job, expect decent pay, and enjoy a strong social safety net. And that’s what they got — kind of like Roosevelt’s New Deal without all the restrictions added by New York bankers and southern conservatives. Strong trade unions developed, which tend to promote gender equality. The public sector grew, providing women with good job opportunities. Iceland today has the highest rate of union membership out of any OECD country.

Over time, Scandinavian countries became modern social democratic states where wealth is more evenly distributed, education is typically free up through university, and the social safety net allows women to comfortably work and raise a family. Scandinavian moms aren’t agonizing over work-family balance: parents can take a year or more of paid parental leave. Dads are expected to be equal partners in childrearing, and they seem to like it. (Check them out in the adorable photo book, The Swedish Dad.)

The folks up north have just figured out — and it’s not rocket science! — that everybody is better off when men and women share power and influence. They’re not perfect — there’s still some unfinished business about how women are treated in the private sector, and we’ve sensed an undertone of darker forces in pop culture phenoms like The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo. But Scandinavians have decided that investment in women is both good for social relations and a smart economic choice. Unsurprisingly, Nordic countries have strong economies and rank high on things like innovation — Sweden is actually ahead of the U.S. on that metric. (So please, no more nonsense about how inequality makes for innovation.)

The good news is that things are getting better for women in most places in the world. But the World Economic Forum report shows that the situation either remains the same or is deteriorating for women in 20 percent of countries.

In the U.S., we’ve evened the playing field in education, and women have good economic opportunities. But according to the WEF, American women lag behind men in terms of health and survival, and they hold relatively few political offices. Both facts become painfully clear every time a Tea Party politician betrays total ignorance of how the female body works. Instead of getting more women to participate in the political process, we’ve got setbacks like a new voter ID law in Texas, which could disenfranchise one-third of the state’s woman voters. That’s not going to help the U.S. become a world leader in gender equality.

Maybe one day we’ll decide to follow the Nordic example. But at the moment, we seem to be moving away from Iceland and closer to Yemen. Is that really what we want?

PHOTO: Denmark’s member of the European Parliament Hanne Dahl votes as she attends with her baby a voting session at the European Parliament in Strasbourg March 26, 2009. REUTERS/Vincent Kessler


We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/

I agree, this is a totally silly article. I am a minority woman in the U.S. and comparing such a small homogeneously populated country to the large, diverse U.S. is not a reasonable comparison. In the U.S. you have diversity of races, religions, education levels, ignorance levels, and on and on and on! This article becomes “obviously” biased when they throw in a mention of Tea Party not “knowing how a female body works!” THAT IS LAUGHABLE…BLA, BLA..BLA! Another mouth piece..an obsessed liberal…Lynn Parramore.

Posted by DRVV | Report as abusive

Okay the first thing you should know is the Vikings were enlightened to start with. Women retained ownership of everything they brought into the marriage including their dowry and they could own land, Marriages were arranged but they could get divorced easily. The woman of the house wore the keys to all the buildings tied around her waist as a sign of her authority and responsibility. Her husband could own the land but she owned the house.
Free woman’s children were protected by law and recognized as the property of their mother. Even after divorce the children were entitled to inheritance. Babies and toddlers could not be taken off their mother by their father. Older children were divided between the parents depending on the wealth and status of the two families.
Women were not hurt in attacks and it was considered shameful if you hit a woman.
Women could go out with the men on boats when not raiding. Vikings were known to write poetry to their wives.
Women were seen as valuable members of society, even if there were many things they couldn’t do. They were considered equals not their husbands property.

Posted by Brin1956 | Report as abusive

Good and affordable day-care and schools are important factors too.

Posted by Finnish | Report as abusive

I would like to tell all the ignorant commentors something about my country. I went to grammar school for 9 years, completely free of any fees. After that I went to HS, again, free of any fees. I went through university and got my Masters Degree, again free of any fees, and graduated debtless. During my studies in uni, I was diagnosed with breast cancer. I had alot of treatments during my battle, but I came out of it alive and healthy. How much debt did I have after such massive treatments? None. I started working, earned 4300 usd (3200euro), and paid taxes about 30%. Few years after,I became pregnant, and because of me previous health issues I was under tight watch and spent the last 2 months in hospital. Again, no debts. I had my first child, and during my maternity leave I was paid 70% of my salary. When my child was 3yrs old, he went to daycare, which cost me 300 usd per month. When my child was 6, he went to preschool that has no fees. In the grades 1 and 2 our city has to find afterschool program for the child, it is mandatory. Often these programs are gov run or organisations, so they are free, you only pay for the snacks they get there, and that will cost the parent 40usd per month.
Someone said that I LOSE 25-30% of my income. That must be a rightwinger, who does not value or respect equality and I do feel sorry for everyone like him. I am more independent than alot of men in USA, I think that might be the reason why these men feel so threatened about our way of life.
Ignorance is a bliss they say, feel free to stay that way, I believe in educating yourself :)

Posted by IhanaNainen | Report as abusive

I would like to live in Iceland, I think it is one of the most peaceful places to live in this planet.

Posted by Pepe1 | Report as abusive

“The folks up north have just figured out — and it’s not rocket science! — that everybody is better off when men and women share power and influence.”
Love the article! I grew up in Norway and think this is all very right, the Scandinavians are good at equal right among men and women. Its not perfect, there are still issues, but from my point of view it is much harder to be a women in USA than in Norway.
This is stuff I would love to write more about in my own newly started blog http://www.liseinamerica.blog.com. Check it out!

Posted by Lisekv | Report as abusive

Here are my thoughts on Icelandic Beauty http://www.richtrek.com/2011/05/hot-wome n-in-iceland.html

Posted by RichTrek.com | Report as abusive

It says something for Charlie Bronson’s notoriety, that ex-world heavyweight boxing champ Mike Tyson actually dedicated he is title belt to to him. In return, Bronson gifted Mike a pewter replica of his prison door. Not full size of course.

As recently as 2009 Charlie Bronson was declined parole, the parole board believing that he had not really reformed his ways.

Charlie Bronson is an authority in various types of mixed martial arts, and is a fitness fanatic.He has written numerous books, and these include volumes on how to work out and keep fit in small places.