Va. AG: When voters don’t decide

By Joshua A. Douglas
November 18, 2013

Voters decide who wins an election, right? Not necessarily.

In fact, we may see partisan operatives determine the winner in the razor-thin race for Virginia’s attorney general. After the initial count, Democrat Mark Herring is ahead of Republican Mark Obenshain by a mere 164 votes out of 2.2 million. If Herring remains on top after a recount and any federal court litigation, then the next step is for the Republican candidate to initiate an “election contest” with the Virginia General Assembly.

This election contest is a procedure in which the losing candidate disputes the certified results. States have varying ways to resolve these controversies — and most use a process that allows partisans to determine the ultimate winner.

There are better solutions, however, than allowing a partisan legislature to decide. We can minimize ideology, actual or perceived, by creating a bipartisan entity that would resolve a post-election battle.

Yet in Virginia an election contest goes to the General Assembly sitting as a joint session, with the speaker of the House of Delegates presiding. Republicans now control a majority of the Virginia General Assembly seats — and have been pushing through a socially conservative agenda.

Some states allow their elected judiciaries to decide a disputed election. Still others have stranger processes. In Texas, for example, the governor decides an election contest for the state’s Presidential Electors. Imagine the presidential election coming down to Texas — the governor would then hold the key to determining the outcome.

When election administrators hold partisan positions, they will inevitably face pressure to render decisions that help their side.

Consider that Ohio’s highest election official, the secretary of state, has been mired in disputes during each of the past few election cycles — regardless of which party held the seat. Both Democrats and Republicans have been blamed because this is a systemic problem.

Even if decisions of election operatives are fair-minded, the public will likely view their actions as partisan. This undermines the integrity of the entire election system.

These problems are amplified when an election is extremely close. One enduring narrative of the 2000 presidential election is that the “conservative” majority of Supreme Court justices decided Bush v. Gore in favor of the Republican candidate, George W. Bush, on ideological grounds. Though not necessarily true as a legal matter, this narrative persists because of the ideological appearance of the process.

By contrast, the result of the 2008 Senate dispute in Minnesota between incumbent Republican Senator Norm Coleman and Democrat Al Franken was far less charged because of the bipartisan nature of the trial court that heard the case. One judge was Democratic-leaning, one was Republican-leaning and one was known to be an independent — all from different parts of the state. The state supreme court’s unanimous decision upholding the lower court’s ruling in favor of Franken reinforced the message that the initial decision was not ideological.

What will happen if the Virginia attorney general’s election goes to the General Assembly? The debate will likely become mired in partisanship — especially if the Republican legislative majority rules in favor of the Republican candidate.

Even if the General Assembly is correct in its ruling, it is unfair to the winning candidate — and the electoral process — to have that win sullied by claims of partisanship.

Minnesota’s outcome was widely accepted precisely because it was bipartisan, with equal representation for each major political party on the three-judge court.

Some states have similar procedures that take the decision away from partisan legislators and judges. In New Hampshire, for example, a five-member Ballot Law Commission resolves election contests. The New Hampshire speaker of the House and president of the Senate each select two members (one from each major party), and the governor selects the last person, who must be qualified in election procedure. Though it may be impossible to remove partisanship entirely, there are ways to at least minimize it by reforming who hears these disputes.

Virtually every news story about the Virginia attorney general race has included a designation of the partisan make-up of the County Board that resolved the initial disputes over counting the ballots. Stories about federal court litigation now usually state the party of the president who appointed the judge in charge of making the decision. If this election goes to the General Assembly, reports will inevitably include a discussion of the legislature’s partisan make-up. This is unfortunate.

We should decide these post-election controversies without actual or perceived ideology. Our nation is ever more closely divided. And elections reflect this, as they increasingly go into overtime. We must reconsider the procedures we use to resolve these disputes, to remove partisan decision-makers from the process.

PHOTO (TOP): Virginia General Assembly. WIKIPEDIA COMMONS

PHOTO (INSERT): Mark Herring   Courtesy of MARK HERRING FOR AG.COM


 

 

 

499 comments

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/

Have you ever considered publishing an ebook or guest authoring on other sites? I have a blog based on the same topics you discuss and would really like to have you share some stories/information. I know my visitors would value your work. If you are even remotely interested, feel free to send me an e-mail.

Hi! I’ve been following your web site for a while now and finally got the bravery to go ahead and give you a shout out from Houston Texas! Just wanted to mention keep up the excellent job!

Hello! I’m at work browsing your blog from my new iphone 4! Just wanted to say I love reading your blog and look forward to all your posts! Keep up the superb work!|

Hi! Quick question that’s entirely off topic. Do you know how to make your site mobile friendly? My weblog looks weird when viewing from my iphone 4. I’m trying to find a theme or plugin that might be able to fix this issue. If you have any recommendations, please share. Thanks!

Hey I know this is off topic but I was wondering if you knew of any widgets I could add to my blog that automatically tweet my newest twitter updates. I’ve been looking for a plug-in like this for quite some time and was hoping maybe you would have some experience with something like this. Please let me know if you run into anything. I truly enjoy reading your blog and I look forward to your new updates.|

Awesome blog! Do you have any suggestions for aspiring writers? I’m hoping to start my own blog soon but I’m a little lost on everything. Would you advise starting with a free platform like WordPress or go for a paid option? There are so many choices out there that I’m totally overwhelmed .. Any recommendations? Many thanks!

Hi there would you mind sharing which blog platform you’re using? I’m going to start my own blog in the near future but I’m having a difficult time choosing between BlogEngine/Wordpress/B2evolution and Drupal. The reason I ask is because your design and style seems different then most blogs and I’m looking for something completely unique. P.S My apologies for being off-topic but I had to ask!

My partner and I stumbled over here by a different website and thought I might check things out. I like what I see so now i’m following you. Look forward to checking out your web page repeatedly.

I like what you guys are up too. This type of clever work and exposure! Keep up the good works guys I’ve you guys to blogroll.

Great info. Lucky me I discovered your website by accident (stumbleupon). I have saved as a favorite for later!|

Hello there! This is my first visit to your blog! We are a team of volunteers and starting a new project in a community in the same niche. Your blog provided us useful information to work on. You have done a wonderful job!|

always i used to read smaller articles which as well clear their motive, and that is also happening with this post which I am reading now.|

I enjoy what you guys are up too. This type of clever work and exposure! Keep up the good works guys I’ve added you guys to my personal blogroll.

Do you mind if I quote a few of your posts as long as I provide credit and sources back to your website? My blog site is in the very same area of interest as yours and my users would really benefit from some of the information you provide here. Please let me know if this alright with you. Thanks a lot!|

I am actually grateful to the holder of this site who has shared this enormous article at at this time.|

Whats up this is kinda of off topic but I was wondering if blogs use WYSIWYG editors or if you have to manually code with HTML. I’m starting a blog soon but have no coding knowledge so I wanted to get guidance from someone with experience. Any help would be greatly appreciated!

Admiring the persistence you put into your blog and detailed information you provide. It’s nice to come across a blog every once in a while that isn’t the same out of date rehashed material. Wonderful read! I’ve bookmarked your site and I’m adding your RSS feeds to my Google account.

Hi there! This blog post couldn’t be written much better! Looking at this post reminds me of my previous roommate! He constantly kept preaching about this. I most certainly will send this post to him. Fairly certain he’ll have a good read. Many thanks for sharing!|

I visited multiple sites however the audio feature for audio songs present at this web site is in fact fabulous.|