Don’t miss the boat on trade facilitation

By Stephen Green and Harold McGraw III
December 3, 2013

Trade ministers open their meeting in Bali Tuesday with the aim of creating a new multilateral trade reform package worth more than $100 billion to the global economy. The deal — focusing on measures to cut red tape at borders — would be a welcome shot in the arm for both global trade and for the World Trade Organization itself.

This may come as a surprise to some. Indeed, you could be forgiven for thinking that the Doha Round of multilateral trade negotiations had quietly died after a 10-year struggle. But in fact, work has continued in the World Trade Organization — and in capitals around the world — to capture some of the gains from what was once billed as the most ambitious trade round ever. The first multilateral trade agreement in almost 20 years now stands tantalizingly within reach.

The package on the table in Bali includes important provisions on agriculture and development, which would give greater transparency and additional safeguards for international trade. Top billing should go to “trade facilitation” reforms that would streamline border and customs procedures the world over.

That might sound strange. After all, customs regulation is hardly a topic to get pulses racing. But the importance of this agenda is apparent when you realise that around 7 percent of the value of global trade is eaten up by unnecessary bureaucracy at borders.

Consider the time it takes to get goods through customs. Clearance times of two weeks are regrettably par for the course in many parts of the world. It’s not uncommon to hear from businesses struggling with the consequences of having goods stuck in customs for many months.

The flip side is that where customs procedures are improved, businesses and consumers see clear benefits. And in quick order too. In Japan, measures introduced through the 1990s cut average lead times for cargo in half, leading to huge savings for businesses and real increases in consumer welfare.

Looking across the economy, the largest beneficiaries of trade facilitation reforms tend to be small- and medium-sized enterprises, which are too often deterred from trading internationally due to complex customs requirements. Research now suggests that a robust WTO deal could trigger a 60 percent to 80 percent increase in cross-border small- and medium-sized enterprise sales in some countries.

Put in these terms, the business case for this trade deal is compelling. It’s a shame that this has been stuck waiting for the rest of the Doha Round to catch up. But the time is now right for a fresh approach: a trade facilitation agreement should act as a bridge towards a progressive completion of the rest of the Doha Round in future years.

In addition to providing a major stimulus to the global economy, a deal would also reinforce the WTO’s central role in shaping the rules that govern world trade. The challenges now facing global trade are formidable. Showing that the WTO can help by tackling them one by one — rather than in a mammoth undertaking — would be an important step forward and a model to build on.

That is why we both strongly support an ambitious outcome from this WTO ministerial meeting. In the past three weeks, officials and ministers from around the world have been locked in round-the-clock negotiations to hammer out a final deal. Given the string of missed deadlines and periodic crises that have characterised the Doha Round, a little scepticism would not be surprising. Yet, there are grounds to think that things will go better this time.

For one, few think that excessive customs regulation is a good thing. While there are disagreements on details, speeding up goods across borders is a shared goal among all WTO members. The bones of this deal have been clear for some time, awaiting only the finishing touches.

Under the WTO’s new director-general, Roberto Azevedo, huge progress has been made toward doing just that. The Bali deal is a crucial part of his vision for freer and fairer global trade that supports economic growth and employment. So, it is important to us all — businesses, governments, consumers — that this deal gets done.

That said, success is far from assured. One consequence of the failure to complete the Doha Round has been a progressive disengagement by those who stand to gain the most.

But the prize now on the table is significant. Support and engagement in the coming days from both governments and businesses will help avoid a repeat of past failures. This is vital not only for companies big and small — but also for the jobs and growth that rely on international trade.

It’s time to get this deal done.

 

PHOTO: A South Korean soldier stands guard in front of a gateway leading to the KIC (Kaesong industrial complex) at South Korea’s CIQ (Customs, Immigration and Quarantine), just south of the demilitarised zone separating the two Koreas, in Paju, April 10, 2013. REUTERS/Kim Hong-Ji

632 comments

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/

Nice post. I learn something totally new and challenging on sites I stumbleupon on a daily basis. It will always be interesting to read through content from other writers and use a little something from other web sites.

Right here is the right webpage for everyone who hopes to find out about this topic. You understand so much its almost tough to argue with you (not that I really will need to…HaHa). You definitely put a brand new spin on a topic which has been written about for a long time. Great stuff, just great!

The new Zune browser is surprisingly good, but not as good as the iPod’s. It works well, but isn’t as fast as Safari, and has a clunkier interface. If you occasionally plan on using the web browser that’s not an issue, but if you’re planning to browse the web alot from your PMP then the iPod’s larger screen and better browser may be important.

Thank you for your really excellent info and feedback from you. car dealers in san jose

Spot on with this write-up, I truly believe this site needs considerably a lot more consideration. I’ll probably be once again to read a lot more, thanks for that info.

This is one extremely intriguing post. I like the way you write and I will bookmark your weblog to my favorites.

I’m glad to be among the visitants on this outstanding internet web site (:, regards for posting .

There is noticeably a bundle to realize about this. I assume you produced specific nice points in functions also.

Hands down, Apple’s app store wins by a mile. It’s a huge selection of all sorts of apps vs a rather sad selection of a handful for Zune. Microsoft has plans, especially in the realm of games, but I’m not sure I’d want to bet on the future if this aspect is important to you. The iPod is a much better choice in that case.

Should you happen to significant fortunate men and women forms, referring by natural indicates, in addition you catch the attention of some sort of envy in consideration of those types the other campers surrounding you which have tough times about this subject. awnings

whoah this blog is excellent i really like studying your posts. Keep up the good work! You understand, lots of individuals are hunting round for this information, you can help them greatly.

Between me and my husband we’ve owned more MP3 players over the years than I can count, including Sansas, iRivers, iPods (classic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etc. But, the last few years I’ve settled down to one line of players. Why? Because I was happy to discover how well-designed and fun to use the underappreciated (and widely mocked) Zunes are.